future face travel in time

Travel Through Time with Our AI-Powered Aging Feature! 🕰️✨

Have you ever wondered what you'd look like if you were younger or older? Our aging feature lets you explore your appearance across different ages in just a few seconds! Discover your unique look at various stages of life and have fun playing with your virtual transformation. 🌟

Simply upload a photo of yourself, choose between a younger or older look, and let our state-of-the-art AI model work its magic! Watch as your face transforms with realistic and natural-looking details, giving you a glimpse of what you might look like at different ages. Perfect for satisfying curiosity, reminiscing, or just having fun with your appearance! ⏳✨

Need Assistance? We're Here to Help! 🙋‍♂️

Q: How does the aging feature work?

A: Our aging feature uses advanced AI algorithms to analyze your uploaded photo, identify your facial features, and apply your chosen age with realistic shading, texture, and details. The result is a natural-looking preview of your appearance at a younger or older age!

Q: What types of photos should I use for the best results?

A: We recommend using clear, well-lit, front-facing photos without any obstructions for optimal results. Low-quality, poorly lit, or obstructed images may affect the accuracy and quality of the age simulation.

Q: Can I try both younger and older looks?

A: Yes! You can experiment with both younger and older looks one at a time to find the style that best suits you. Simply choose a new look and see how it appears on you. Have fun exploring different ages and discovering your unique appearance! 🌟

Q: Can I use the aging feature for creative projects or entertainment?

A: Absolutely! The aging feature is a fun and engaging tool for creating unique, captivating content for creative projects, social media posts, or simply for personal enjoyment. Let your imagination run wild and enjoy the fascinating results! 🎨

Q: How accurate is the AI-generated age simulation?

A: Our AI model is designed to provide a realistic preview of your appearance at different ages. However, keep in mind that the simulation is not a guarantee of how you would look in real life. The aging feature is intended for fun and exploration, so enjoy the experience and embrace your unique look!

Future Face Travel in Time APK for Android

V 3.0.87

Softonic review

A free program for Android, by Max code.

This app lets you see what your face will look like in the future and in the past.

Future Face Travel in Time is a great tool to have fun with and to make some interesting photos. If you have a photo of yourself and you want to see what your face will look like in the future or in the past, you can use this app to make the picture look like another age.

This application lets you go to the future or to the past. You can go to the future if you want to see what your face will look like, and you can go to the past if you want to see what your face looked like when you were younger.

If you want to make the picture look like another age, you can choose an age from 20 to 60 years old.

User reviews about Future Face Travel in Time

Have you tried Future Face Travel in Time? Be the first to leave your opinion!

Explore More

FlipMe Demo App

Ultimate Lifestyle Companion: FlipMe Demo App

A free program for Android, by Tarotrix.

AI Chatter Love

AI Chatter Love: Virtual Companionship at its Best

UZ TV - online tv Uzbekistan

UZ TV - Online TV Uzbekistan

Tuber Pure Vanced

Tuber Pure Vanced: Ad-Free Video Streaming App

Numerology Calculator

Numerology Calculator: Discover Your Destiny

1024Live - A High Quality Video Live Broadcasting App

A To Z Telugu Lyrics

A To Z Telugu Lyrics Review

Urdu Paheliyan with Answer

Urdu Paheliyan with Answer: A Collection of Classic and Latest Riddles

Revanced: Block All Ads on Tube Videos

Mermaid Wallpapers

Mermaid Wallpapers: A Stunning Collection of HD Images

Spin 2023: A Simple and Entertaining App

That is the spectacular and colossal “Hand of God”

Apple is one step away from bringing ChatGPT to the next iPhones: this is what we know

OpenAI would be developing a new AI different from GPT-5 with great capabilities

Google Maps incorporates two useful novelties in its latest update

Breaking news.

Netflix continues to do things that no one has asked for: a reality show based on Charlie and the Chocolate Factory has been confirmed

The new AI from Microsoft is very, very big

How to Install Windows 11 Without Using a Microsoft Account (Very Easy!)

How to use Simontok on your phone in 3 easy steps

The first Neuralink implant is having problems

Ace Your Job Interview: Common Questions and How to Answer Them

Laws concerning the use of this software vary from country to country. We do not encourage or condone the use of this program if it is in violation of these laws.

In Softonic we scan all the files hosted on our platform to assess and avoid any potential harm for your device. Our team performs checks each time a new file is uploaded and periodically reviews files to confirm or update their status. This comprehensive process allows us to set a status for any downloadable file as follows:

It’s extremely likely that this software program is clean.

What does this mean?

We have scanned the file and URLs associated with this software program in more than 50 of the world's leading antivirus services; no possible threat has been detected.

This software program is potentially malicious or may contain unwanted bundled software.

Why is the software program still available?

Based on our scan system, we have determined that these flags are possibly false positives .

What is a false positive?

It means a benign program is wrongfully flagged as malicious due to an overly broad detection signature or algorithm used in an antivirus program.

It’s highly probable this software program is malicious or contains unwanted bundled software.

Why is this software program no longer available in our Catalog?

Based on our scan system, we have determined that these flags are likely to be real positives.

Your review for Future Face Travel in Time

Thank you for rating!

What do you think about Future Face Travel in Time? Do you recommend it? Why?

OOPS! This is embarrassing...

Something’s gone terribly wrong. Try this instead

future Face travel in time

Please read this privacy policy carefully.

By accessing or using future face travel in time app, you agree to comply with its provisions. This privacy policy is part of and incorporated into this app terms of service ("terms of service"). If you do not agree to all of the terms and conditions set forth below, you may not use this app.

By using the Future Face Travel in Time App in any manner, you acknowledge that you accept the practices and policies outlined in this Privacy Policy This privacy policy covers our treatment of your personal or private information that may be accessible when you are using our App.

As a matter of principle, KhasTech solutions (“Company,” “we,” “us,” “our”) do not ask the App users regarding their personal or private information. However, users may import some personal information such as photos or camera pictures or some text content voluntarily for processing the App. According, we do not collect, store, process or transmit any such personal information outside the device/app or website on which the App/Game is installed beyond the stated and publicly declared functions of any Apps/Games. Secondly, we do not share users’ personal information with other Apps/Games, devices, profiles or sell such information any third party in any form even on the device on which App and game is installed for any reason whatsoever. As a matter of policy, we do not sell, share or rent personal information about our customers (the users of the App) to any third parties at any time and in any form.

The only exclusion to this statement is the presentation of personalized or geo-localized advertisement within the Apps and Games that are activated through Google AdMob or other Ad Networks Software Development Kit (SDK) using some device information by respective Ad Network. Usually such information sharing is limited to selection of appropriate Ads by the Ad Network and CA has no direct information about such data.

Also, we use third-party advertising companies to serve ads and the third-party advertising companies may use non-personally identifiable information about a user’s visits to the App in order to provide advertisements about apps, goods & services that may be of interest to users.

Moreover, for the analysis of the App's performance, we may have integrated certain analytics SDK in our app (such as Google SDK). We may collect statistical data through the said SDK anonymously purely regarding the users response to the App's various features.

Furthermore, we use third party code, libraries, SDKs or other software content and tools for the functionality of our Apps. This policy does not apply to the practices of those companies as we do not own or control (including, without limitation, the third party content providers from whom you may receive content through the App), or to individuals that we do not employ or manage. For this purpose, you should refer to those companies’ privacy policy statement.

Moreover, any personal information if obtained/stored within the operational scope of the installed App and game will be deleted and erased from the device permanently on un-installation of the App by the user to safeguard his/her privacy and it’s NO record is held anywhere for any reason.

While we makes its best effort to safeguard the personal information mentioned above while stored on the device or in use by the App and Game within its defined/ declared scope, CA will not be responsible for any loss of information or data or any consequential loss/damage thereof due to any reason including malfunction of the host device or other malicious code or Apps and Games belonging to any third party, running on it.

Please exercise caution when deciding to disclose your personal information.

If you have any questions about our policy or regarding the matter of how we collect data or process your personal information or anything else related to our privacy policy practices you may contact us at [email protected]. We would like to hear from you about them.

This Privacy Policy may be updated from time to time. When updated the "Effective date" will be amended and the new Privacy Policy will be posted online.

Future Face Travel in Time

An amazing funny app to see your face, travel in time with future face app.

About Future Face Travel in Time

More data about future face travel in time, alternatives for the future face travel in time app.

More from JK-Apps

Google Play Rating history and histogram

Downloads over time.

Future Face Travel in Time has been downloaded 2.3 million times. Over the past 30 days, it averaged 750 downloads per day.

Changelog of Future Face Travel in Time

Developer information for jk-apps.

[email protected]

Team JK apps

Share and embed Future Face Travel in Time

Comments on future face travel in time for android, google play rankings for future face travel in time, technologies used by future face travel in time.

Top Android apps being viewed
DS SMITH AR for Android
Total Adblock for Samsung
BangBang Survivor

Android Statistics

Android statistics
Google Play Developer stats
Trending Android Apps
Top popular Apps

About AppBrain

Documentation
Tips to improve your Android promotional campaign

Data safety

No data shared with third parties

No data collected

Security practices

Data isn’t encrypted

Data can’t be deleted.

Science Borealis t-shirts mugs and hand bags

Time travel is possible, but it’s a one-way ticket

Chenoa van den Boogaard , Physics and Astronomy editor

The ability to travel through time, whether it is to fix a mistake in the past or gain insight into the future, has long been embraced by science fiction and debated by theoretical physicists. While the debate continues over whether travelling into the past is possible, physicists have determined that travelling to the future most certainly is. And you don’t need a wormhole or a DeLorean to do it.

Real-life time travel occurs through time dilation, a property of Einstein’s special relativity . Einstein was the first to realize that time is not constant, as previously believed, but instead slows down as you move faster through space.

As part of his theory, Einstein re-envisioned space itself. He coined the phrase “spacetime,” fusing the three dimensions of space and one dimension of time into a single term. Instead of treating space as a flat and rigid place that holds all the objects in the universe, Einstein thought of it as curved and malleable, able to form gravitational dips around masses that pull other objects in, just as a bowling ball placed in the centre of a trampoline would cause any smaller object placed on the trampoline to slide towards the centre.

A computer-generated representation of Einstein’s curved spacetime. The Earth creates a gravitational dip in the fabric of spacetime which is deepest at its core. Courtesy and Â© of NASA

The closer an object gets to the centre of the dip, the faster it accelerates. The centre of the Earth’s gravitational dip is located at the Earth’s core, where gravitational acceleration is strongest. According to Einstein’s theory, because time moves more slowly as you move faster through space, the closer an object is to the centre of the Earth, the slower time moves for that object.

This effect can be seen in GPS satellites, which orbit 20,200 kilometres above the Earth’s surface. These satellites have highly precise clocks onboard that gain an average of 38 microseconds per day due to time dilation. While this time gain seems insignificant, GPS satellites rely on their onboard clocks to maintain precise global positioning. Running 38 microseconds fast would result in a positioning error of nearly 10 kilometres, an error that would increase daily if the time difference were not constantly corrected.

A more dramatic example of time dilation can be seen in the movie Interstellar when Matthew McConaughey and his crew land on a planet with an extreme gravitational field caused by a nearby black hole. Because of the black hole’s intense gravitational influence, time slows dramatically for the crew on the planet, making one hour on the surface equal to seven years on Earth. This is why, when the crew returns to Earth, Matthew McConaughey’s daughter is an old woman while he appears to be the same age as when he left.

So why hasn’t humanity succeeded in making such drastic leaps forward in time? The answer to this question comes down to velocity. In order for humanity to send a traveller years into the future, we would either have to take advantage of the intense gravitational acceleration caused by black holes or send the traveller rocketing into space at close to the speed of light (about 1 billion km/h). With our current technology , jumping a few microseconds into the future is all humans can manage.

But if technology one day allows us to send a human into the future by travelling close to the speed of light, would there be any way for the traveller to use time dilation to return to the past and report her findings? “Interstellar travel reaching close to the speed of light might be possible,” says Dr. Jaymie Matthews , professor of astrophysics at the University of British Columbia, “[but] this voyage is one way into the future, not back to the past.”

If we can’t use time dilation to return to the past, does this mean that the past is forever inaccessible? Perhaps not. Einstein proposed that time travel into the past could be achieved through an Einstein-Rosen bridge, a type of wormhole. Wormholes are theoretical areas of spacetime that are warped in a way that connects two distant points in space.

A visualization of a wormhole: The fabric of spacetime curves back upon itself, forming a bridge between two distant locations. Image by Panzi , CC-BY 3.0

Einstein’s equations suggested that this bridge in space could hypothetically connect two points in time instead if it were stable enough. “At the moment, even an Einstein-Rosen bridge cannot [be used to] go back in the past because it doesn’t live long enough – it is not stable,” Matthews explains.

“Even if it was stable, it [requires] other physics, which we don’t have. Hypothetical particles and states of matter that have “exotic” physical properties that would violate known laws of physics, such as a particle having a negative mass. That is why “wormholes” are only science fiction.”

While it would be fascinating to travel back in time to see the dinosaurs or to meet Albert Einstein and show him the reality of time travel, perhaps it is best if the past remains untouched. Travelling to the past invites the possibility of making an alteration that could destroy the future. For example, in Back to the Future , Marty McFly travels to the past and inadvertently prevents his parents from meeting each other, nearly preventing his own existence. But if he had undone his own existence, how could he have travelled back in time in the first place?

Marty’s adventures are a variation of the grandfather paradox: what happens if you go back in time and kill your grandfather before your father is conceived? If you are successful, how is it possible that you’re alive to kill your grandfather in the first place?

A recent study at the University of Queensland may have the answer to this baffling paradox. In this study, the researchers prove mathematically that paradox-free time travel is possible, showing that the universe will self-correct to avoid inconsistencies. If this is true, then even if we could travel back in time, we would never be able to alter events to create a different future.

While these new findings are enlightening, there appears to be more evidence that, although time dilation can allow us to glimpse the future, we will never be able to visit the past. As the late Stephen Hawking said in his book Black Holes and Baby Universes , “The best evidence we have that time travel [into the past] is not possible, and never will be, is that we have not been invaded by hordes of tourists from the future.”

Banner image by Alex Lehner, CC BY 2.0

240 thoughts on “ Time travel is possible, but it’s a one-way ticket ”

How do I go about time travel? what do I need how do I get those required things?

Very large ring magnets and some mathematics and will to see it in reality.

How about a sphere magnet ship…

hoe about 3d time and hemi synch or portals augmented reality,power of suggestion..drugs pcp binural tones frequency amplitude .virtual computing ie.

I’m a time traveling tourist, Stephen Hawking was wrong.

Time is simply a measurement of space under the amount given its mass and the amount of light and dark in which governs its mass in a 4dimensional reality step outside of the force in which permenates its flow one would reside there would be no past present or future there be a fixed permance of a constant here and now and so ok then what is to come.

Very well explained article !!

But I think if physics says time travel can be possible then it’s definitely possible. Considering not to go back to your childhood and fix things but rather can go to the past but as invisible person to them. So that,

No actions by you would impact your future.

Regards, Kirankumar DR

Tell me more

Yes.. I wish I can do this too 🙂

We will understand it better, by and by…

I have a theory for warp speed, but nasa would have to put it to the test…check my Facebook

I am reading for this drive , i am ready , without think my life safe or not

@Ravi chandila English translation please?

Please someone help me I just want to send a message to myself in my past.,to get the love of my life, he never revealed to me his feelings now my life is ruined by the decision of my elders Please help me, it’s question of my life and death. Nazneen

Is time travel machine is their, if the time travel machine is true can it move to the past . To bring back my lost life

That’s the problem you know.. it is not there that’s why we aren’t able to travel time..and yes it it will be built then you will be able to do so…..

damn my life is also lost and broken but still no one can give a time machine for free

DO NOT change the future. That’s why people like you couldn’t go. One wrong person to ruin it for the rest of us

On the point of time reversal, it is evidently impossible. The Uncertainty Principle prohibits spacetime reversal. The Universe is unable to remember its past (as a consequence of the Uncertainty Principle), therefore the Universe cannot reorganise itself.

Can I have to go on my past with another time travel it is a possible when just tell me about one thing that can I have to go in my past one year

we dont need magnets.we need a strong gravitational force to warp spacetime allowing us to travel through with speed of sound or speed of light or faster.we need to learn how to control such force carefully or it could be lethal.gravity slows down time.but it can theoratically work both ways.if we can reverse the gravity’s natural reaction we could speed up a spacecraft faster than light(its all relative(and theoratical))

I WAS ACTUALLY JUST THINKING THE SAME THINFG BEFORE READING YOUR PIECE. VERY WELL EXPLAINED, AND IT DOES MAKE ALOT OF SENSE. WELL DONE.

oh and I forgot to add it can be the key to look into the universe and also travelling time(theoratical).speed and gravity are the key to the universe(theory not proved)

All you really need is a crystal diode with 16 sides, a large pain of glass, and a frequency transmitter near a bathtub full of ice cold water….if you reach the right frequency you can travel through time forward and reverse…

Magnetized metal(VCR Reading Head), to read time out of the Magnetosphere all around earth. The Magnetosphere kills 2 birds with one stone- it protects earth and it records human time:

Mystery solved and I will explain, I was in a coma 3 months and I experienced things, I traveled time forward and backward, it is not a one way ticket. Movies and songs are recorded on magnetic tape in a VCR tape Cartridge or Cassette tape,Â Â Magnetic tape recording works by converting electrical signals into magnetic energy, which imprints a record of the signal onto a moving tape covered in magnetic particles.Â Â 3D life on earth(a movie), and the Magnetosphere all around earth coming from the core of earth(MAGNETIC ACTIVITY) without Atom Made Tape, is like a movie on magnetic Atom made tape in a VCR tape cartridge. Revolution and Rotation is the motor(VCR).

This is why people have those freaky Deji’vuÂ feelings like they have lived this before, BECAUSE YOU HAVE, and how people can be psychic, and how there is Prophecy in the Bible. When a person dies, their Spirit- MIND(Thoughts, Feelings, Urges(Physical and mental personality)) breaks out of human body- a stopped heart is what releases the spirit from the human body. Then the Soul(Life) with the memory of your existence in it breaks out of spirit and goes back to your birthday with a erased memory, meanwhile your spirit goes back in time to when you were a teenager starting the mental puberty, maturity from that adult spirit you died with in last life.In that old movie Star Wars or maybe it was the Empire Strikes Back, there is a scene where Princess LayaÂ plays like a 3D movie, that is EXACTLY how its of life on earth.

Mr Snow, I believe you as I have seen it too. As humans we have deep knowledge of things we cannot rationally explain but you have done a great job here.

I thought that Analogy would be a better and easier way to explain, or in a picture of the earth from far out in space with the atmosphere around it looks like a DVD disk and the earth being the center sticker but is in 3D.

Actually you are on to several things here. I have also had the infusion of knowledge that also had to do with comparing life to recorded movies and music. I know you were using it to explain your theory, but I do think there is something there, I always have. When you watch a movie you are seeing the past. Why canâ€™t you somehow use a recording as a base to go back into? I agree with everything you said here, and itâ€™s worth looking into.

Jeffrey, very interesting idea!! Could be something to that. As far as your coma experiences, I think there are things we just do not understand and are nearly impossible to explain. Perhaps time IS like a video tape, or a DVD? Magnetism is one of the forces of nature. I too have had some odd experiences that suggest that we are able to perceive things beyond our five known senses.

I think if you have had a near death experience, such as being in a coma, then you have experienced the powerful hallucinations provided by the chemical substance DMT which your body creates naturally in times of extreme trauma, but also found in most plants and used recreationally by some who are brave enough and into that kind of thing. Your theory is interesting, but completely unproven and as far as I know untested. If things were so simple, I’m sure many scientists would have already thought of such an idea and tested it.

How do I travel through time

Be alive and live life to the fullest is the best way to travel through time ! OR Befriend grey aliens../ They may hold the key to the sum of all knowledge in the universe..

Sounds good will it work

Really log vaps mil sakte hau h kya

Can you plz explain I didn’t get it

You dont first all you are not experienced in the field of the space time continum and you could you upset the already fragile and multitude of alternate realitys that have looping due irresponsible ones who somehow gotten the technology causing another altered time frame there are a disarray multiple reality which are looping in earths 4dimensonal time frame time traveling is not for a vacation or just to get a joy ride its a serious and complex reality not be joked about it is a real thing and certain individual have are upset the balance of earths original time zone note now the gaurdians of this region of milky way the galatic order of the light keepers Angelic gaurdians of the (names with held)are working over time ooh nice pun (over TIME) ha wow to restore Earth back to a original time continum

Who said I want a joy ride, my life is devastated even my kids are suffering, I want to commit suicide but can’t leave my kids back, Being captive for most of my life, if my life is changed nothing will be disturbed, only thing happens is 3 life’s will be saved. And more so over I don’t want to travel I just want to send a message to myself in my past plz on the date of 30th May 1996. My life is ruined plz help me, it was my dad,brother, sister who pushed me into the dungeon and my husband and his family took over the charge of torturing me. Nazneen

I want to go back in time and tell my 5 year old self to burn the creepy dolls that my mom bought cause there is demons in it at the same time I will kidnap and torture my dad right now go back in time and show the younger version of my dad show him what will happen to his future self if he donâ€™t get rid of those possessed objects and keeps letting my mom buy those antiques Iâ€™m 18 now Iâ€™m single no girlfriend no friend alone nothing very depressed too and I try to remember the positive things that happened in my life which there arenâ€™t many tho but the demons keep squeezing my memory brain and my mom keeps on making so much loud noise including her damn mouth I have attempted to burn the demonic dolls but I only burned them for a minute or two with gas cause I was worried I might accidentally set my whole neighborhood on fire but then my mom threw it all in the recycle instead of the trash so the demons just keep bothering me its driving me nuts he he.

Access to a Quantum Computer Network on the web would be a good start. A series of ChatBots and webhook sites strategically placed in not only space, but in time. A series of algorithms and I think information can be transferred backwards to ones self…

How do we know that there are no horde of tourists among ourselves?

How do we know we’re all not tourists?

We’re all time travelers. We all travel into the future daily. 1 second at a time. Lol…

Agreed! I had the same thought!

Excellent question

If is possible, I would like to go back to: January the 1st 1975 & relive the 70â€™s as I prefer that decade to the awful one I am facing now, Back then We had more police our streets & left our front doors open, Those days were far much more better .

https://3netra.co.in/61-2/

Please do comment on my blog post regarding time travel

how about you ask the flash to help you

I need the time travel so I’m fails so many times i love time travel i have to go fast and future so i have no idea im travel is a my dream so my dream solution plz say me i have time travel so please help me someone please…..

I think you are over reacting

When we look at the stars now it is what they looked like years ago so what if we go to the stars and look down?

You cant go to the stars. It will just take billions and billions of years to go even to the next nearest star than our Sun- proxima centuri. Sorry to say, but do you think that you will be alive all those years??

You can do that without going to the stars… our planet reflects light as well thus making it visible from other parts of the universe…. has the word â€œreflectionâ€ crossed your mind ? 😉

Contact me on my hangout I will help you [email protected]

bro just time travel its not that hard

Please help me to time travel, can I see myself when I go back in time like Harmaini sees herself in Harry potter?? Or can I send messages to myself I know the particular date when to send. It’s not the mistake I had done in my past but it was done by my father and brother who are safe, happy enjoying their lives,my life is totally ruined Please help me. Nazneen

I want to go back in time to save my wife .it was a bad mastake she died .that could be changed i need to go back and save her. Please help me.yours gordon sutcliffe

Would love to hear more how itâ€™s possible, as I am really so desperate to go back in time. I lost my wife 6mons back because of COVID and I will do the impossible things to make it happen.

DMT Experience

what is that?

Dmt experience. Time travel, out of body and sometimes superhuman capabilities.

Jump into a black hole

We have to lose something(the past) to gain something(the future) in time travel.Time cannot be played with.Am I correct.

you need to have d e t e r m i n a t i o n

Time machine is possible

speeder than light LOL

speeder than light cuz if the light break it limits it will move backward in time

Don’t Just don’t disturb the past

I want to go back in time and see my dad. I miss him.

mee too raina I lost my father the day before you posted the comment 18th may, crap it hurts me so much. I would rather die to bring those moments back….

Everything is connected . Time isn’t real .

It is universe we travel to and not a time line in one universe

Ask trump….Mandela effect…. dmt 5th dimension

u need an X-WING starfighter and a lightsaber to fight the knights at past and a R2-B2 to track

The fact that no one has time travelled to the past is the proof that time travelling will NEVER exist.

Others have. Portals open most of the time. Example: Miami Fl. Magnetic Material gets bombarded by the sun. Which fractures and formed portals within that area. Ley lines can lead to the portals of travel within miami for just to start. One can laugh or wonder if. In my experience jumping for the better the word of it (Movie Jumper) can be done. You can either Teleport or Time Travel. Our sun open these portals everyday. The best time when Sun spots start to emerge. All that electrons traveling at light speed is enough to rupture our magnetic fields on Earth. You will return of course. Like water on a lake or an ocean time will corrects itself. Your inner clock is your ticket back home. With a little math,fourth dimensional thinking,a magnetic meter, the right location,history research and luck. You may get to expirence it. First clue….cold spots…it may not be a ghost.

Plz can you help me please help me you can save my life

I wish I could help you, I can sense your sufferings.

You need a bag of hyperlink modules to start, then nuclear beepbeep gatangas, when you have that come back here and I will tell you what you need next.

You need high voltage beepbeep gatangas and a large broonasic magnet of about 450 Gauss, come back here when you have these and I will tell you the rest.

you need an old fashioned police box

If you rotate the center of the earth in the opposite direction, then the whole earth can be moved back in time, on the other hand, if you move the center of the earth and change its position by separating it from the part of the earth, then you will be able to time correctly. Let’s reach the other side.

How I could time travel any time travel machines inverted

give audition in the flash series..

I think that to go back in time you’d to travel faster than the speed of light since time stops at the speed of light but if you wanted to go back to say mlk’s assassination you would need to go at least 10 times the speed of light

You don’t want to, the moment you wrote that message is a historical point in time.

When time travel is possible, you should dÍŒÌµÍ”Ì®Í‰Ì£Ì¯Ì³iÍ’ÌÌ†ÍŸÌ©Í…sÍ¬Ì½ÌŠÍ†Í¢ÍŽÌ²Ì–Í™ÌºrÍ†Í‚ÌšÍ˜Ì–Ì¹eÌ‚Í¬Ì›Ì«ÌªÌ±Í‡Ì˜Ì©gÍÍ£ÌŠÌŒÍœÌ–Í‰Ì¤ÍšaÍ‘Í‚Í’Í¡Ì¯Ì—ÍšÌ¬ÍÌ±Ì¦rÍ¦Í—Í˜Ì±ÌdÍ‹Ò‰ÌªÌ–Ì¥Í”ÌŸÌŸÍšÌ» Í§Ì”ÍÍŽÌ¬iÌ‡Í®Í«Ì†Ì§ÍšÌ«Ì»tÌ“Ì‚Ì•Ì©Ì»Í‰Ì©Ì˜Ì°Ì Ì« Ì‰Í†ÌŠÌ‡Í€Ì¦Ì»Ì³Ì¦iÍ£Í„Ì´Ì—ÍÌžÍ™Í‡mÍ¦ÌšÌ‘Í¦ÍÍšÌœÌ¬Ì¹Ì˜ÌŸÌmÍ«ÌŒÍ†Í¡Ì±Í•Ì»Í‡Ì®Ì Ì°Ì¼eÍ©Ì¢ÍˆÌœÌ±dÌƒÌ¿ÌˆÌšÌµÌ¦Í…Í™Í”ÌÌ¹iÍ¯Ì›Ì–Ì¬Í“ÍšÌ©ÌÌ—aÌ…ÌÍÌ¦ÍŽÌÌ£ÌÌ˜Í”Í™tÍ¥Ì€Í—Ì´Ì±ÌŸeÍ—Í¨Ì‚Í’ÌµÍŽÌÍ“ÌŸlÍ¦Í¦ÍœÌ¼Í•Í•yÍ£Ì¸Í™Ì¯ÌºÌ˜Í‰,Ì‘Í«ÍœÍˆÌ»Í™ÌÌºÌ˜Ìž Í’ÍœÍ”Ì—Ì£dÍ›ÌÌ¶Í‡ÍšÍ‰Ì¦ÌžÌ—oÌ’Í©Í„Í€ÌžÌ®Ì»Ì²ÌœÍ…Ì Ì‰ÌÍ‚ÌÍ€Ì²Ì™Ì¦Ì®ÌºnÌŒÍ ÌÌžÍ–oÍ›Í©ÌÍ›ÍœÌ¬Í•Ì¯Ì©Í“Ì®Ì«ÌtÌ¿ÍŠÍ†Ì•Ì¼Ì™ ÌÍ€Ì²ÍšÌ²Ì¬Ì¦Ì—mÍ—Ì†Í£Ì¢Ì¹ÌœÌÌ Ì¬aÍ„Ì‡Ì‰Í›Ì¨Ì²ÌºÌ»ÍˆÌ¹ÍŽkÌŒÍ€ÌœÌªÌ±eÍƒÍ—Í˜ÌœÌ³Í”Í‰Ì£Í“ Ì‰Ò‰Ì²Í…ÌžÌ˜ÍˆcÌ‹Í¥ÌÌ´Ì¦Ì£ÌÍ‡ÍˆÌ™oÍ¯Í€Ì«Í‡Í‡Ì˜Ì»Ì Ì¹ÍŽnÌ”Ì‡Ì¾Í¢ÌºÌ¹Ì£Ì¦tÌ„Í‚ÍœÍšÌ¹ÍšÌ™ÌžÌªÌ—ÌºaÌ‹Í›Ì†Í˜ÌžÌ—Ì–Ì»Ì©Í‰cÌŽÍ˜Í™Ì™tÌÍ§Í©Í„Ì•Ì»Ì Ì£Í‰Ì¹Ì Ì£Ì² Ì¿Ì¶Í•Ì—Ì¬wÍ¦ÍÍ¡Í“ÌžÍÌ¹Ì°Í–Í‰iÌ¾Í¦ÌƒÍ„Ì•ÍŽÌžtÌÍ¦ÍžÌœÌºÌ–ÌhÍ›Ì‡Í®Í«Í¡Í™Ì°Ì¬Ì–ÍŽÌ° Í£Í¯ÍÍ•Ì»ÍšÌ¹ÌºaÌ„Í¡Ì±Ì™ÌÌ¦Ì¤Ì¼Ì¥nÍ¥Í†ÌŒÌ‹Ì¶Í”ÌœyÍ¨Ì·Í“Ì»ÌºÌºÍ‰Í‡Ì»oÍ„Ì‰Í£Ì”ÍŸÌ£Ì±Í™ÌœnÌ’Í¬Ì§Ì¦ÌŸÍ”ÌœÌ«Ì—eÍƒÍ‚ÌšÌ¡Í•Ì® Ì‰ÍÍ‹Ì½Ì¡Í“Ì˜ÍšÌÌ¹Í”tÍŒÍ‹Í˜Ì–ÍÍšÌÌ¬ÍˆÍ…ÌhÍ†Ì“Ì¾ÍœÌ±Ì—Ì–ÍšÌ¼Í”Í•aÌ‹Í¦Í©ÍÍ¢ÍˆÌ£ÍÍ•ÍtÌÍ¡Ì–ÌªÌ¤Ì³ÍŽÌ± ÍƒÍ«Ì›Ì»Ì Ì¼Ì¬lÌ‚Ì¶ÌžÌ¤Ì£Í…Í”Ì—Í”oÍ„Í¯Í Ì¹ÌžÌ¦Ì–ÍšÌ«ÌœÌ±oÍƒÍ®Ì‹Ì§Ì¯Ì±ÌªkÌ“Í§Ì•Í‰ÍŽÌÌ»sÌÍŸÌ¤ÍˆÌª Ì”Ì‚Í¨ÍœÌ¤ÌžÌ³Í”ÌÌªÌŸÌ¹hÍ—Ì…ÌÌƒÌ›ÌÌ²Ì°Ì»uÍÌ‡ÌˆÍÌœÌ™mÌŠÌ§ÌžÌ®ÌŸÌ¦Ì³ÌŸaÍŠÍ›ÌÌ¸Í“ÌºÌ²Ì¼ÌœnÌ’Ì¶Ì³Ì®.Í‹Í¬Í—Í©Í¢Í‡Ì»ÍšÍ“Ì³ÌºÌœÌ±

It’s Close I can feel it

Yes it becomes a history but my life also in the past changes and the present also with it. The way I’m suffering from the pain and want to end my life I’m 100% sure at least sure no one around me is or was as hopeless and horrible as my hubby I’m devastated I really want to send a message to my past it may not start but it will definitely change. I was forced, not given any option, my father and brother gave me wrong information and had no concerns for me. It was just survival for me. I repent for not killing myself when I had time, but now if I have a chance why not. Now when I’m out of my marriage I come to know a guy then had feelings for me, was madly in love and wanted to ask for my hand, now I want to inform my self and change everything plz help me.

I too would like to go back in time. I just wish he lived a happy eternal life. I would just like to repeat to come back in 2020.

I heard from a guy in Idaho that time travel is possible. You’ll need to go online and purchase a pogo stick looking device and make sure not to forget the crystals.

I think u need a black-hole-proof spaceship, go to the centre, escape the black hole and viola! You are now in the past. If you can’t escape, then you’d travel to a time where that black hole didn’t exist.

Believe me you time travel! If not physically then you do mentally,like you through dreams.

Though they sale it online, it would not take the chance. It is as simple as beating the speed of light and having some system to send you to the time you want. Time however is not real, and were just traving universes. It will all be in the open in 2028 according to other travelers.

All you need base on how to travel to time is very simple but had to find firstly find a way to get to space through a space rocket secondly find a very perfect consifigration for traveling to tiTme then find a very fast rocket that could create a form of force reaction in space in order yo enable fast speed in space for the break through of non gravity in space and make sure that while doing all you activities is not far away from planet and not also to close to planet earth and make sure that you are with wristwatchs whose time is set disame then you can to the future

Man you can get all you need for too build a time machine in your local store man, man I sure wished Iâ€™d kept mine but it frightened the heck off me man, sometimes when I fart I find a grape in my pants

time travel is a fake, baseless and delusional idea. If you believe in that crap then tell us if we are living in the future or in the past. To travel backward the entire system has to return all along with nature and events, it won’t be for you alone except time travel only happens in the mind.

you would need to get about 1,000,000 pounds of silicon and then somehow conduct enough energy to make 500 cars run without an engine and then go to a nuqular power plant and somehow make a portal. but the whole world could go out of orbit if you do that so I wouldent sugest it.

Time machine is good and bad because,with the time machine you will know about your future which is not good.

Is time travel actually a real thing because if it is then I need it because I am trying to go back in time to fix all of my mistakes

So what if time travel is the reason that we now believe there are other realities in our own world.this could be that a Time traveler we could only go back and couldn’t come back, and on doing so if you do something to change the past in stead make a new reality.making other things are deferent and ours realty stays the same . sometimes reality gets mixed up make the mandela effect that we see today

Time in the future it is faster then now. The past is slower so you can travel . It is up to you. One way is to meditate. You can travel and see any body you want right now. You can fly faster then light. That is one way. You go to the future. To go to the past you sleep for a long time. Some time you go to the future or the past. Your heart well stop and your body gets cold. Sometimes you can control it sometimes you can’t.

but how do we know that is really true ? i mean i want to figure this out, i want to time travel, but how is it that simple ? so many people have been trying to figure this out for many years and its that simple ?

Yeah what if you get stuck in there what do you do than

You cant go there in the first place. Dont worry. With current technology, we will only end up messing some few microseconds. Highly doubtful, if we can end up getting the news of travelling hundreds of years in our lifetime.

wait what would happen if someone saw you while you where in past/future i’m curious

Time is an illusion based on perceived reality and is only relative to our limitations. Time isnâ€™t what it seems and all things canâ€™t be figured out

Im on a school computer looking this up and i found this article and scrolling trough it and ive not heard one statement here as good as yours bro

This is blowing my mind people, then I see the school boy on the post. Great stuff, whoever reads this is already capable of travelling through time. Think about all people who have posted on this thread, now think about who will read mine. Now think of those â‚¬opposite trolls $ who never ever bother posting on you tube thread etc. But ONE comment from one of the time travellers who wrote on this thread. So that opposite troll is me,I donâ€™t normally post.however because of previous comments Iâ€™m posting here. And I love the DMT shit I loved that and lived that one out in real life,,,,another day.

So my point is ifOne or two threads have made me write this….then what will my post make others write , think…..then I could travel back and not write this…. then what. Love the conception of time how can u travel something that doesnâ€™t YOU perceive to be time, like a train can only run on its train tracks, a car can only drive on a road etc Itâ€™s posibble I know it is. Sometimes when u have fun times moves swift but locked in jail it goes snail pace. U c me. I write letters to myself from past from future. Remember everything that happens in present becomes part the past. But the future is what you hold in your hands. Question is, now you know….what the f are u gonna do about it?.. 01/04 ==== 21

Hahahah only realised school boy is named BIG dick pissing myself laughing I gotta go pee. Respect certified

so not halal mode

True so were not traveling in time. It is just different universe (on what we call) different time, day, tears, etc.

You would be scared for life

you will desepear

Maybe it has happened before and we just don’t know that they’re from the future. If people in the future time traveled, the would know that it’s dangerous to mess with the past and would pretend to be part of the past.

I believe time travel is already possible, however we cannot fix past mistakes without altering future predicaments. Say we stop JFK’s assasination, that would completely change the future from that point forward to one none of us can know/guess or conclude the effects? Other time travel purposes go to the future I think that from now our world will die off before 2096 basdd on overpopulation, global warming & polution as such creating islands of plastic waste in our oceans. The best thing my opinion go back to the garden of Eden, kill that Serpent Satan before he tricks Eve into the forbidden fruit. Then let God raise, enlighten & teach us how to be humanly sustainable on his planet & I guarantee technology & smart phones? Ain’t no part of it!!

Time travel possible but one n only theory of Stephen hawking

How it is possible to jump in time …??

Many ways. The most used is creating a black hole which can be done in a few ways. 1) traveling forwards or backwords faster than the speed of light 2) been known during heavy lightning strikes. Each way is a fast movement that opens the black hole. It has been done by the Government since the 1980s though they claimed they never beet the speed of light until 2002. However, Time is a illusion and their for we are actually traveling different universe that are differnt than ours even if the difference is by 1 thing. Each universe may have (what we call) different time, days and years. And each time we change that time line we created a new one. It is belief as CERN has said they destroy 5 universe, that they can travel to them. Since 2012 it has seem we been shifting and is now belief they have possibly came together. The event is known as The Mandela Effect.

No one has the right theory in my thinking. Only a few things are wrong. It is universes with (what we call) different time, days and years we are traveling to and not time itself as it is a illusion. Their is no stop to how much we can do, or where we can go. No limit as such say.

There is no God. No magical serpent or Garden of Eden ever existed. Basing a scientific theory on archaic stories does no one any good.

You choose a hopeless eternity. I choose hope through the promise of salvation through Christ for those who believe. You see, I have child in heaven. Thankfully, have a hopeful reality that I can embrace. There is a God. Our known universe is only 14 or so billion years old… is it mathematically possible that random molecules out of the Big Bang mixed in just the right way from to form a complex cellular organism… with DNA… and result in humans and such diversity of life forms? Itâ€™s naive to accept this as a result of chance. Think about it. How is that remotely possible without a creator?

Hahaha. You make it seem as tho the big bang happened, and we just popped into existence? Naw it’s called evolution baby, we started out as microscopic organisms, seriously, when did you drop out of school? But that’s like saying a some guy writes a book to explain away natural phenomenons that they were to stupid (un-evolved) to grasp and the concept good and bad and the eternal damnation, And thus, the Bible, and boom, everyone now was made by God, hahaha. When you can prove he/she exists, and that the Bible was a autobiography, and not just some twisted piece of Fiction, that has no real basis in reality, and cannot be proved to be more that a work of Fiction. Rather than being used as the16th Century control tact, ‘be good or you’ll go to hell’. But I guess that’s what they mean when they say ignorance is bliss, (maybe if I was as ignorant as y’all believers I’d believe to). But I can’t see how a ‘GOD’ would ever ask one of its creations to kill another.. Genocide, Crusades, all the ethnic cleansing.. All In the name of God Almighty! Hahahahahhaaa. Aliens are more believable than this shit, and theirs no proof they exist either. Hahahahaha. Fug’n Bible thumpers. ‘Step out side your faith and see the world for what it really is, a complex organism, mad of gravity and dust, quite a unique specimen! And we, yes Bible bangers, this includes you, are destroying it like the bubonic plague.’. ‘The end is coming and it’s our fault’

Have you taken the time to read The Old Testament and the prophecies therein that came to be ?.

How do you explain that ?.

My last post should read GS not G

You have not had an encounter yet with God. Don’t be so certain on yuour theory of evolution. He came and shook my reality to it’s core. Made thing possibly that no one could ever explain.

What are you talking about? Ur so wrong and funny in every way.

BlissfullyInformed just told me his comment was all an April fools prank. He believes in Jesus and was just fooling.

Time travel is very much possible just as you decided to come existence in this century meaning one can decide to be in another time zone . life is all about numbers, you just have to work on numbers

I’m pretty sure ppl don’t decide to come into existence. If that were true I wouldn’t be replying to your comment.

Un like your other reply, I understand what you mean. Each timeline (or universe as some see it) can easily be traveled to at will. No different than traveling threw your time you want to visit.

Science has proven a few things from the Bible is true. God does exist. Christians are confused with time and what it says. For a example. God created the world, as science even belives it was God who created the big bang, yet the bang has happen itself creating the moon, planets and stars. Christians also fail to understand chapter 1 and 2 of gen. spoke of two different creations which can be why we see dinosaurs before humans as chapter 1 spoke of animals first and humans 2nd. Their also was different time than, as without the moon a full day is 6 hours. It would take 4 days back than to equal are 1 day. Time is lost and Christians are just confuse on that time. That does not proof their is no God. As they have already found the robes of Jesus and remains of Noah’s ark, it proves much did happen. The bible only has less than 50% of what was written.

Changing the past is impossible, because if we went back into the past, that means we were already there during the time you experienced it.

We all know how to get into time travel but how do we get out……..

You don’t need time travel – all you need is life. And what is life? Life is the evolution of the impossible into the inevitable over an infinite amount of time.

if it is shown that if something, such as a solution to a particular class of equations, were possible, then two mutually contradictory things would be true, such as a number being both even and odd. The contradiction implies that the original premise is impossible.

This is called proof by impossibility. Thus if some traveled back in time far enough to kill his grandfather, we have the contradiction and therefore it is impossible.

You could argue that he would be able to time travel, but not kill his grandfather. However almost anything a person does going back in time would cause the same contradiction, thererfore it is the traveling back in time that is impossible.

Actually, it probably is possible to travel back in time, however to do so, you would also have to travel so far in space that you cannot see anything that happened before your current time due to the speed of light, because this to could affect the future.

The reason I am here is that, i really want to go back the day when our matriculation exam was just finished. Everything around me is peaceful and happy. Currently, I am living in dire situation. People are dying outside on the streets. Smokes everywhere. Everything is in doom. Ah, yeah. I really miss my past. If you are reading this, you can judge me in anyways. I just want to live peacefully and happily.

You must live in Portland

I entirely know what you say and how you feel, Robin. I am totally convinced that future is no promise to offer a better place to live. World is becoming unnecessarily more complex and more horrible and more insecure. Therefore, travelling back in time to a point where things were still far away from such ordeals is what I aspire. But I think if it is possible to travel back in time without the possibility of carrying our lived experiences with us, it will be useless as we will be repeating the same mistakes over and over again. Now, this begs the questions “in what type of physique could we imagine ourselves back there if such time travel becomes possible? That is, becoming younger again in a physical regression (as I said this would be a torture without having learned from all these later years)? Or appearing at our desired times in our present physique and age? I believe the most ideal one would be if we appeared at our desired point in time at the same age that we were at that point of time with a good feeling of our later lived experiences.

Mam all u need to do is just run faster as much as u can or visit the black hole because in both condition time just slow it down ….

Time travel is simple. If you do happen to travel to the past you create a new time line not affecting the time line you left. In essence you going to the past is now your future. Even if you were able to return you may never know if you remained in your time-line or created a new one. So even if you changed something in your travels it would happen in the future not the past.

Sorry time traveling is not possible, there is no way you can go into the past or the future â€â™‚ï¸. You can only be in the time you are already in.

Incorrect. General relativity allows time travel into the future. You need a space ship that can travel extremely fast though, approaching the speed of light, or you need to get close to a supermassive black hole.

It is travel into the past that there is no known practical way to do, and is probably impossible.

So what happens when we Die? Where do we go? I want to go back in time so I can meet my childhood friends…

Simple question from a simple mind:

At what point, when a person says they are from the future, do we stop throwing them in the funny farm and actually start listening??

When they show actual proof. Not just some random prediction of the future.

I don’t believe that “glimpses into the future” could be possible. If it were so, we could glimpse blueprints of the future that we could bring back to the present and build before they were invented. My personal.beleif is in any time frame there is only one active time which is the present. The past no longer exists and the future hasn’t occurred yet, so there is no such thing as ‘time travel’ except for the frame we are in now.

First off time is not real we make time if you travel anywhere all you are doing is beating the Earth speed try this for a mathematical equation the Earth travels a thousand miles per hour you’re not beating human time that is your own equation the Earth travels a thousand miles per hour a space shuttle travel 17,000 mph you can beat time that you made so time is not real you are only beating the Earth speed if you go in a space shuttle and go around the earth 17,000 miles per hour the Earth only travels a thousand miles per hour plus it has all types of gravitational pull from the Moon Earth’s access on the til t you figure out the mathematical equation I cannot time travel is real if you can beat the Earth speed and we can it has nothing to do with its 12:00 it’s 1:00 that’s not real time is made up as a mathematical equation you can beat the Earth speed you can go back into the Earth’s time in a space shuttle but you’re not beating anything except the Earth’s speed think about that one time is not real at all all it is is a mathematical equation think about that one real long

What I’m trying to say is this a space shuttle travel 17,000 mph the Earth travels a thousand you beat it 16 times faster that’s all you did you’re not beating any time you’re not beating 1:00 you’re not beating 3:00 all you’re doing is beating the Earth’s time you can go in reverse around the Earth 17,000 mph okay you can go forward with the Earth’s centrifugal force 17,000 miles per hour you’re not beating anything you’re beating a mathematically equation that we we created astronauts been traveling time for instance for years and haven’t told us because of the space shuttle that does travel 17,000 mph it beats the Earth speed 16 times a boggles my mind you have the Earth access the moon gravitational pull but you can get in a space shuttle and travel 17,000 miles per hour and beat the Earth’s speed 17 times think about it

If any scientist or anybody can actually answer this question how do you set up this equation with the Earth spinning a thousand miles per hour you have the moon pulling gravity the Earth’s access on until I want to know tell me then wondering for a while this equation popped into my head about 2 years ago I’m not a math whiz or anything I just thought about it weird how the mind works I’m not into space or any space stuff at all I’m Samanthas boy friend John antos wrote this

I liked your post and the knowledge you given. I also written a post on Time Travel.

how would any of that stuff be true because e’*34+Em would stop all the forss of vissecs and how would we do it if you now what i mean??? also thanks for the scuff for my project

I would love it if I had a real life time machine here with me now which could take me to anytime I want, the past, present or future. If I had a time machine here with me now, I would go to the past in September 2004 when I was born and give myself to another family that is actually rich and not this horrible family that I have now.

that not nice

Close but not quite right scientists of the idiotic variety, yes, you don’t want people to travel back in time to mess with their own pasts, of course, but you say it’s impossible, but it’s not, and I’m always ignored with my crazed crackpot theories, so what’s the harm in telling the truth as I see it, while it could be possible to travel to the past, here in lies the problem with rewriting the future, while some believe it’s possible to travel back in time, but it’s very expensive and definitely a one-way trip to the future or to the past. Basically Doc Brown got the mechanism for time travel almost right but the energy out put needs to be quadrupled instead, allowing for the ‘physical item, being or vehicle’ to transport through time without killing the time traveler in question. Wormholes are unpredictable, until warp speed for spaceships are a thing, it is not possible for the space ships to achieve time travel, unless they want to enter a black hole, which I would not recommend. as you need warp speed to survive the emptiness of the black hole, without being ripped to shreds. Say for example, Back to the future 1, the timeline doesn’t erase it continues on without the ‘said time traveler’ in existence basically the Marty from Wimpy George’s timeline did time travel to the past and messed with his parent’s meeting so to speak, but never return to the same timeline therefore Marty A went known as a Missing Child in timeline A, while it continues on without him, however Marty A became Marty B/C, in the Successful George Timeline. So that is what I’m talking about. the timeline changes only for the time traveler themselves the ones who are left behind don’t experience a thing of timeline rewritten-ism, as it would never happen in the first place. The other thing is if you want to mess with your own childhood, to make a better life for the past self, the key thing to remember it’s not really you. It’s an alternative version of you, that you interfered with. creating a parallel timeline to it’s original, yet slightly different. Yes it would be awkward to raise yourself. but as long as you are staying in the past, nothing should happen until the age you traveled back in time, unless of course you touched your past self and suddenly de-aged and merged with your past self, is an option 1, option 2 the future self explodes spreading guts all over the place and therefore the past self, of you became a murderer of your future self, I am more inclined to believe option 1 as option 2 seems a little too out there. Basically you would have two memories one of the former timeline and one of the current different timeline. Still traveling through time is truly a one way trip and if you want to travel through time, you would need some time travel mechanism, the way you scientist talk is basically a dream version, or an OBE version (OUT-OF-BODY-EXPERIENCE) which is basically a vivid/lucid dream which is not true time travel, the true time travel is based on the BTTF Trilogy not the idiotic versions you preach about. I believe I’ve said enough.

Mystery solved and I will explain, I was in a coma 3 months and I experienced things, I traveled time forward and backward, it is not a one way ticket. Movies and songs are recorded on magnetic tape in a VCR tape Cartridge or Cassette tape, Magnetic tape recording works by converting electrical signals into magnetic energy, which imprints a record of the signal onto a moving tape covered in magnetic particles. 3D life on earth(a movie), and the Magnetosphere all around earth coming from the core of earth(MAGNETIC ACTIVITY) without Atom Made Tape, is like a movie on magnetic Atom made tape in a VCR tape cartridge. Revolution and Rotation is the motor(VCR).

This is why people have those freaky Dejiâ€™vu feelings like they have lived this before, BECAUSE YOU HAVE, and how people can be psychic, and how there is Prophecy in the Bible. When a person dies, their Spirit- MIND(Thoughts, Feelings, Urges(Physical and mental personality)) breaks out of human body- a stopped heart is what releases the spirit from the human body. Then the Soul(Life) with the memory of your existence in it breaks out of spirit and goes back to your birthday with a erased memory, meanwhile your spirit goes back in time to when you were a teenager starting the mental puberty, maturity from that adult spirit you died with in last life.In that old movie Star Wars or maybe it was the Empire Strikes Back, there is a scene where Princess Laya plays like a 3D movie, that is EXACTLY how its of life on earth.

If only wish I could undo everything what I’ve done wrong in the past, I’d be more happier

And that my friend is absolutely what you do not or would not know. Everyone focuses on what they don’t or haven’t had rather than what positives they do have around them. To change the ingredients of a past life only changes the flavour you have in this life, it does not make you happier.

No, travel to the future is not possible. Like, future is unpredictable and always have been so give up on that field

Already has been, and has been proven.

Time travel is not so possible for every one , but there are already time travelers on earth #@*

Who are these time travelers?

Depends if it is the Governments (they done it since the 80s), or if it was a Accidental travel, or a simple us creating our own machine. Either way, one can easily find storys, and other evidence with a good research. I have a website that shows the effects of change cause by time travel.

They are out their (done by the government since the 80s) but the future is open with time travel (told its open since 2028) so they travel back much.

Time travel 101-

Create a closed loop circuit around a full metal structure, hermetically seal it and bring O2, Use two tesla coils to create north and south poles. (Artificial Magneto sphere.) Make sure to pain the outside in lead to prevent any cosmic rays from penetrating the materials on the inside. (Radiation = bad). Connect a ball made of w/e with wires that alternate the current from the coils to w/e panel on the outside of the structure to make it move via inductive magnetic / electric Lorentzo (Lorentzo = ExMfield = Velocity. = Antigravity) Create Antigravity by using forces from the inside reactor. (Pressurized Mercury, and Tesla Turbine.) Then Move 10-100x faster than light depending on the charged field, Friction will be added to the electric field instead of the craft allowing the G-forces not to crush you inside. The field will take the pressures of outer space, The temperature of space will allow for super conductivity of the structure.

Eventually you will arrive in the future, if you stay in one place. but account for the movement of earth in your travel log. To see outside you will need a monitor / camera system, as any leaks through a viewing area will cause death by radiation from the cosmic rays from the field you have created.

The O2 can be used as a backup generator, through air pressure and the tesla turbine.

There are many different ways to make wormholes, but the curvature of space is really hard to calculate to send a machine far out to the end and create a link with the machine that wants to travel there. And leaving one behind to get back.

If you can imagine it, it can be done. You just need the knowledge of not dying to complete it.

U.S.S. Tourist, You’re a time traveler or just insanely smart.

You don’t need to go the speed of light. Human Time is recorded in the magnetospere as a movie is record, ed on magnet VCR Tape or a song on a record. A VCR or record does not have to go light speed to retrieve the recorded info. All of life is recorded in 3D by our Magnetosphere. My Analogy is imagine a VCR tape cartridge being the earth, imagine life on earth being the movie but in 3D with out adom made tape, imagine Rotation and Revolution of Earth being the VCR putting all in to motion- playing. That is how its done, the magnetosphere kills two birds with one stone, it protects earth and records time, human time is in a magnetic bubble that is why the Bible refers our time is different from gods time and this is how God the maker(PLANET OF UNITED SUPREME BEINGS) can flip through our time to know everything. By the way long before life on earth, he built the original 7 wonders of world(Pyramids) to Pump the Seven gasses into the atmosphere of this planet found in the goldilocks zone, so Life can live on it, and that life of all types is his technological cyborgs that grow and multiply on earth also he seeded it with plant, trees, sea creature and things that fly,. Anyway that above is how time is recorded.

Until recently, I thought my neighbor was a crackpot until he actually invented a time machine. He utilized an ordinary closet, and showed me the sophisticated (to me) instrumentation he had installed. I was very skeptical at first, until he offered a small demonstration and entered the time coordinates and energized his invention. To my amazement, when I opened the door, the clock on the wall was 30 minutes later than when we stepped into the machine. OMG!!! Destroy this thing before it destroys us!!!.

So happy to have my husband back after 6 months of separation. get any kind of relationship/marriage help you want from….Robinsonbuckler11 @gmail com………………………

I find it odd that people say time travel isn’t possible yet… If time travel is possible, it has always existed. Meaning, there is not past present it future, only our perception of time. What we know as past present and future have always been occurring simultaneously, so travel was invited the moment the universe wss formed. Dinosaurs are roaming the earth right now, and forever. A version of me is typing this and has always been typing this, within this perceived moment of “time” and time travel has always happened, whether or not we exist in that reality at the right “time” to observe time travel is the only question.

I find it odd that people say time travel isn’t possible yet… If time travel is possible, it has always existed. Meaning, there is no past present or future, only our perception of time. What we know as past present and future have always been occurring simultaneously, so travel was invited the moment the universe was formed. Dinosaurs are roaming the earth right now, and forever. A version of me is typing this has always been typing this, within this perceived moment of “time” and time travel has always happened, whether or not we exist in that reality at the right “time” to observe time travel is the only question.

Their had to be one point however, when it was created and started, and for that, there was nothing but the current time. Once it was created, than we had a pass, present and future to which we can go back to millions of years to see Adam and Eve with the dinosaurs or go millions of years in the future. However, given the events that changes, each time a new time line has been created. We also have destroyed the planet and repopulated many times in the last million years. Each event changed, or something we do different (without traveling) enters a new universe where some things may be different or the same. Today are universe are shifting a lot.

To be fair, even if it is a one way trip into the past, that doesn’t stop machines going back. We could send a machine back and order it to do anything we want and then tell it to meet us at a certain time in the future. We send it back, then go straight to the meeting point we agreed and then we’ll be able to prove if it worked or not.

I’m a girl who has read a book about seeing future through a box. So is it actually possible?

Time travel has been done on purpose by the Government since the late 1980s. From research, the mostly use kids, or future Presidents. Their are some cases where people have been struck by lightning or came across some tragically event that cause them to leave their timeline either forward or behind in time. The Mandela Effect is the current cause of how things go wrong when time travel is not done right. Click on my name to see the website.

Even as traveling to a location as a future or pass date is possible as what people here mean. However, as you said, it is numbers. Time is a illusion and we do not travel threw time, just universe that are different than ours. What we call time dates and months is what changes each universe. We are all from different universes today as they came together. The mandela effect is a fine example.

thx to eleon wont we soon be able to digitize our conscious being, then accelerate that data pass the speed of light some how then download it into some android or something…..i dunno…..just a thought

I want to go to my elementary school again. Someone help me out, I know its Idiotic but stil.. I am not good at science. As far I understood, 1) we can trace through time if we travel fast than speed of light.. I think memory os the only thing that is faster than light, Yeah I can go to Paris within 1 sec in my memory but yeah its illustion, i want in real 2) Through Blackhole – I think its Bermuda triangle

if you travel back in time you will still be your age now. That is how it worked with others. No one gets younger otherwise traveling to far back would kill you. No school would let you return to school as a adult so not possible.

Plz help me I just want to send a message to myself in my past and save my self from a beast plz help Nazneen

Would love to experience many moments in life again for the first time again!

I think that time traveling should be left alone, for the sake of humanity. There are some things we’re not ready for yet.

Well stephen hawking may be wrong. I mean, the study proved that the universe self corrects itself to prevent inaccuracies. So maybe tourists from past do visit us but we don’t remember them as the universe alters our memory. If you guys have read about Butterfly Effect, a simple mistake today may grow through years to become a giant disaster in future so if you think of it, oncoming tourists from future may cause giant inaccuracies. Imagine this, You have travelled to past. You brought two cakes for yourself, so you pay the shopkeeper 20$. The shopkeeper invests the 20$ in stocks, strikes gold there and becomes a rich businessman.His daughter goes to Cambridge and marries someone else than the person she was supposed to marry according to time. Can you imagine the magnitude of inaccuracy after 100 years? Therefore, whatever the tourists from future do, is corrected by the universe and we don’t remember it. Creepy, but food for thought.It also adds a special meaning to the word ‘Fate’.

How much wacky terbacky (i.e. weed) you be smokin’ JOE JOE?

Hmmmm…. As brilliant of a mind as Stephen Hawkins was, how is he so sure that he would even recognize hordes of tourists from the future? Almost everyone is aware of the warning of the Butterfly Effect. So I’m sure any future visitors Intelligent enough for Past-Time travel would be amply attuned to this.

Most future people coming to the pass (our time) seems careless and not intelligent. Most are taking FBI lie detector test and telling us what is happening in the future. That is a bad idea, because if you tell us (example) who is the next President, and the Government does not like the person they than can change that event to let someone else in (as seen in 2020) One should never acknowledge who he or she is or why they are their. Most traveling is to get knowing of the pass or to pick up certain things. Since are pass is changing, events are changing and are timelines are messed up, someone made a mistake. The Mandela Effect is a fine example.

Wow that’s great plz help me go to my past plz,I can’t do it by my own at least help me send a msg to myself in my past Nazneen

I think it is possible, but time traveling is really just changing universe created by different time lines. Our whole solar system is in a whole different place now and Earth is much smaller in this universe from the one I grew up end. Someone has already changed the timeline.

Roads? Where we’re going, you don’t need roads!

Youre wrong about your measurement of speed for traveling, in order for time to slow down, with inside an object compared to outside. Scientists proved that time with inside an object at an excelorated speed actually appeared to have slown down during the duration of time for the test. The speed was far less then the terminal speed of a rocket for NASA at 256,000 kms p/h.

In to the volicity of space. Generating a vacuum of space, could be no different the the actual transport of matter over frequency where in fact matter can be carried by sound. It is believed that an alien civilization harnessed this energy in the form of bolisks that where believed to carry the same properities and in consideration of harmonic resinance, the simularities could be used in order to carry large weight. In accordance with a documentry on theoretical science.

However the properties, present the fact that a working property controdicts your counter intuative theory of gravitational deceloration of matter to colide within itself to absorb all things into non existance as to the transfer of matter into energy, rather then your idiolisms of transfer between dimentional space to another destination that is not linked or the transfer between time that isnt, either.

However to reproduce the fabric of time within space in a practical measurement as I have mentioned, would put an end to all the lunacy of an unmeasureable field, which people fail to identify. Like running into a glass window. Only to not know what forcefield is present.

Time travel into the past can be achieved simply going faster than the speed of light.

The closer you get to the speed of light the slower time goes

If you reach the speed of light time stops

If you go faster than the speed of light it starts to reverse

Why does no one seem to know this?

Christopher Reeves did this in Superman 3 brah.

Any time travel, pass and future, is by going faster than the speed of light. It is said by reversing that that you can go back in time. However, I assume since the Government has done this since the 80s they have better ways (maybe tying in a date) and not having to go to a unknown date.

I want to send a message to myself in the past on a particular date plz can you help me, this means a lot lot lot to me,plz help me Nazneen

Why don’t we drop the declaratory statements that it “is or isn’t possible!” Until someone actually does so. Just say “maybe”.

People have and their are records both to the pass and future. The Government has done it since the 80s as part of the “star wars project” and are much better at it today. This explains the black holes in the sky of 2019, and the CERN destroying 5 parallel universes in 2013. We also see changes because of time travel events changing time. The Mandela Effect is a find example.

I want to send a msg to myself and my family in the past ,is it possible plz help me my life will be saved one who helps me saves me and my kids from a pack of beasts,

The worst idea ever. We all want to do this and where does it stop. A lottery win does not sound bad if you knew the actual location, time and place. After a while though, would you not want to write that hit song, become the author of the Harry Potter books, stop 9/11? The idea of giving your pass self (a time time travel was not proven) information of the future could change things in a major way. This would cause one small thing to change creating many others to change. This has already happen in simple ways of the The Berenstein Bears changing to The Berenstain Bears. This is a small event but this event “The Mandela Effect” now has over 3,000 changes.

What if you decided to give your pass self information about a lottery ticket that would be a winner, bought late at night and he was hit by a car on the way to get it. Changes the whole future. However, If detailed right, done right, with no large changes, it may not effect much, but to know your being given info from yourself in a future time (when that was not known much or provrn back than) You would either assume it is a joke or you gone crazy.

I don’t want to win a lottery, my decision about my career and studying was right but my family and their cruelty has put me into this worst condition I just want to go back complete my studies and live a life like a human not like a animal or slave,help me plz Nazneen

Can someone take me to 2013? i can pay later to all of you in bitcoins so its a win win and you dont need to do anything, just wait

LOL but still complicating on my side

You travel in your dreams where time and space colloids ..That’s y sometimes the dream which you dreamt might be a 10 mins reel time but you felt dreaming whole time like 6 to 8hrs .. Probably even traveling to parallel universe

I agree. Dreams as we know it is not a simple sleep. The part of the brain we do not use while awake, we use at night. This is the phenomenon part of the brain that can do thing we feel a human can not do. We of course use less than 30% of our brain. By the use of 100% of the brain we would use both sides and be able to do common things such as read thoughts, move things without touching them etc. The idea of using this side of the brain, would be the theory we can leave our bodies and visit different universe, see what could of happen shall we done something different, and even see future events. This may be why we notice different memories to some things as we could of held some from another reality.

It would be very weird, however, if we were trapped in that universe, or another body and fail to return to ours. Is that how people die in their sleep?

i just fell like going to late 70’s, where i can see majority of family.. i am willing to trade life for it…..

Time travel to the pass is just as common as the future. However, as both has been done it is NOT travel threw time. Time is a illusion we created. We are actually traveling threw different universe with (what we call) different time, dates, years, etc. The Mandela Effect is a find example how traveling threw different reality’s change the time lines.

As a add on to the above, Time travel is not a theory, has been proven, and has been done by the Government since the 1980s. Their is many residue in our history to even show some time travel storys to be real.

Where can one get a reverse watch, is it really possible to go back in past with its help, is it sooo easy ,plz help me ??????? Nazneen

US20060073976A1- search this patent number,this describes the process for time travelling,I really don’t think magnetic energy will work,maybe heat focused on a specific point could expand the fabric of space and make a hole in it.even then I will the hole take you to another time.it would be one thing to time travel but selecting a point in time would be impossible.you could only travel to the time you device was built?

Is there a watch which back travels in time or reverse time watch? Is it true? How to get one? But with that how can I send a message to myself in my past, plz help Nazneen

I don’t believe such a watch exist and their are plenty of smart minds with huge funds trying to travel.right now there are only theories.

Thank you very much for your response. I just want to send a message to myself in my past. Nothing much will be changed but 3 literally dying devastating lives will be saved. We are suffering for the mistakes and egoistic arrogance of others so if possible plz help me

Traveling back in time isn’t just a when problem, it’s a *where* problem. Where was the place you’re standing right now a thousand years ago, or a thousandth of a second ago? There is no useful answer to those questions, so there’s nowhere to travel back in time to.

Traveling forward in time? You’re doing it now.

when you step through a door is time lost when you come back through? lets say you return days Later how much time did you loose. what exactly is Time,.? is dialation a safe way to return ,. a Blackhole will assist you in in travel, the question is will you arrive safe,.

Traveling back in time is impossible. 2 reasons why that are never taken into account.

A) The stuff you are made of ( subatomic material) is being used by something else. It I not like you are a facsimile of the already existing material. What you are made of is exactly the same existing material. The problem is exact stuff can not exist in 2 different places in the same point in time. You will either : Decompile or fall out of phase with the universe. Both bad outcomes for the time traveler.

B) Lets look at it from logical commonsense. You have a bar of gold . You intend to send the bar back 1 second in time. Now you have 2 bars of gold . You send those 2 bars back one second . You have 4 bars …… do that 50 times . You have over 900 trillion bars of gold. All made of the exact subatomic particles. The more the bars back the more the existing mass of the universe increase. What are the consequences of changing the mass of the universe . Hence the paradox . Information can not be destroyed., It also can not be created.

At least this is the way my brain perceives going back in time.

Time is a function of change. None of the 4 forces The strong force , The weak force , Electromagnetism and Gravity can not work without time.

I will figure out time travel one day but only for the past.

I wish I could travel back to 18th of June to save my mom.

Is time travel really a one way ticket? Theoretically, if you can go one way, you should be able to go back.

Time is not one way. It’s consequences are however irreparable given certain circumstances and is not something that should be taken lightly or thought of in a manner of disregard. I’ve only very recently decided to take to your social platforms regarding space and time.

You can try finding me on Instagram. I’m not familiar with these platforms to better direct you there. My Instagram name is johnrvh

On Twitter it seems to be @_JohnRvH

If I go forward I will have to pay extra bills and taxes. I donâ€™t think I can afford it.

You’re the first person I’ve come across in this timeline that has a sense of humor. Thankfully, going forward is not possible if that future hasn’t been created yet.

timetraval is no joke if its created the whole universe could go out of orbit.

Cauchy problem converging to non minimal terraces as t â†’ +âˆž

Stephen Hawking may he rest in peace a genius but not all knowing. As far as he knows we haven’t been flocked by tourists, in the same maybe these UFO sightings are actually time travelers from the future coming to the past to view how we really lived why things really happened the way they did, etc. To limit the imagination of possible and impossible is wrong then you create fantasy. And we have learned from history that there is truth in fantasy. I.e. the different mythos of the different ancient cultures from around the world including those of the Norse. Improbable and probable should be more appropriate. It’s possible because it can be imagined improbable die to the right math or this or that not existing or matching up. I also believe that if time travel to the past were possible that the changing of something in the past would create a new timeline running current with your timeline at which will inevitably collide and will cause the collapse of the universe at which point a new universe will be born.

so i think the speed of light is only relative to deciding a point of destination -initially- as specific gravity of destination needs to be ascertained to calculate the frequency needed to run an alcubierre-white engine to bend space correctly to cross space ‘quickly’, the point of reference may well be jupiter in our solar system for the fact of the moons that orbit it, i surmise that by using a ‘dead end ‘ equation that usually puts notable mathematicians into the outer regions by trying to solve it may actually be the key as calculations end in a loop of 4-2-1 ie 3N+1; this process of calculation creates a sine wave over time/distance relative to specific gravity of chosen destination – as time is determined by gravity therefore if the speed of light to a destination can be used to ascertain the specific gravity of a ‘body’ to visit ie a star or sun due to receivable resonant frequencies emitted by the body, then the constrictions of the speed of light do not exist other than to give a constant, by using the 3N+1 method of calculation ,once the speed of light and returning resonant frequencies of a destination are determined the calculation can be extrapolated to match the distance giving the end point -in doing this the sine wave required can be ascertained and be condensed to create a wormhole and allow the alcubierre-white engine to ‘bend or distort space enough so that the bubble you are in matches the required specific gravity of the destination – the frequency of the body nearest to the destination point should be used and resonated inside the bubble to create synchronicity of frequency and cause attraction i also believe that travelling through space require the ability to see things from different perspectives and it requires the ability to navigate through a series of what may be described as “Aims Windows” where your point of view needs to change inherently with a given position at a given point in the galaxy

Comments are closed.

Blogging from Canadian Perspectives

An inclusive digital science salon featuring Canadians blogging about a wide array of scientific disciplines.

Associate Sponsor

Is Time Travel Possible?

We all travel in time! We travel one year in time between birthdays, for example. And we are all traveling in time at approximately the same speed: 1 second per second.

We typically experience time at one second per second. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

NASA's space telescopes also give us a way to look back in time. Telescopes help us see stars and galaxies that are very far away . It takes a long time for the light from faraway galaxies to reach us. So, when we look into the sky with a telescope, we are seeing what those stars and galaxies looked like a very long time ago.

However, when we think of the phrase "time travel," we are usually thinking of traveling faster than 1 second per second. That kind of time travel sounds like something you'd only see in movies or science fiction books. Could it be real? Science says yes!

Image of galaxies, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope.

This image from the Hubble Space Telescope shows galaxies that are very far away as they existed a very long time ago. Credit: NASA, ESA and R. Thompson (Univ. Arizona)

How do we know that time travel is possible?

More than 100 years ago, a famous scientist named Albert Einstein came up with an idea about how time works. He called it relativity. This theory says that time and space are linked together. Einstein also said our universe has a speed limit: nothing can travel faster than the speed of light (186,000 miles per second).

Einstein's theory of relativity says that space and time are linked together. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

What does this mean for time travel? Well, according to this theory, the faster you travel, the slower you experience time. Scientists have done some experiments to show that this is true.

For example, there was an experiment that used two clocks set to the exact same time. One clock stayed on Earth, while the other flew in an airplane (going in the same direction Earth rotates).

After the airplane flew around the world, scientists compared the two clocks. The clock on the fast-moving airplane was slightly behind the clock on the ground. So, the clock on the airplane was traveling slightly slower in time than 1 second per second.

Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Can we use time travel in everyday life?

We can't use a time machine to travel hundreds of years into the past or future. That kind of time travel only happens in books and movies. But the math of time travel does affect the things we use every day.

For example, we use GPS satellites to help us figure out how to get to new places. (Check out our video about how GPS satellites work .) NASA scientists also use a high-accuracy version of GPS to keep track of where satellites are in space. But did you know that GPS relies on time-travel calculations to help you get around town?

GPS satellites orbit around Earth very quickly at about 8,700 miles (14,000 kilometers) per hour. This slows down GPS satellite clocks by a small fraction of a second (similar to the airplane example above).

Illustration of GPS satellites orbiting around Earth

GPS satellites orbit around Earth at about 8,700 miles (14,000 kilometers) per hour. Credit: GPS.gov

However, the satellites are also orbiting Earth about 12,550 miles (20,200 km) above the surface. This actually speeds up GPS satellite clocks by a slighter larger fraction of a second.

Here's how: Einstein's theory also says that gravity curves space and time, causing the passage of time to slow down. High up where the satellites orbit, Earth's gravity is much weaker. This causes the clocks on GPS satellites to run faster than clocks on the ground.

The combined result is that the clocks on GPS satellites experience time at a rate slightly faster than 1 second per second. Luckily, scientists can use math to correct these differences in time.

Illustration of a hand holding a phone with a maps application active.

If scientists didn't correct the GPS clocks, there would be big problems. GPS satellites wouldn't be able to correctly calculate their position or yours. The errors would add up to a few miles each day, which is a big deal. GPS maps might think your home is nowhere near where it actually is!

In Summary:

Yes, time travel is indeed a real thing. But it's not quite what you've probably seen in the movies. Under certain conditions, it is possible to experience time passing at a different rate than 1 second per second. And there are important reasons why we need to understand this real-world form of time travel.

If you liked this, you may like:

Play On Windows PC

Future Face Travel in Time

An amazing funny app to see your face, travel in time with future face app.

Latest Version

Future face travel in time app, old versions.

Screen Rant

Back to the future's time travel explained: how it works & is it accurate.

Your changes have been saved

Email Is sent

Please verify your email address.

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

Mike Flanagan’s Next Stephen King Adaptation Is The Perfect Time To Revive His 10-Year-Old Horror Movie Trick

2024 reboot of ridley scott's $1.65b franchise shows how to revive his other huge sci-fi franchise, henry cavill's $60 million action movie is better than him playing james bond.

How does time travel work in iconic 1980s classic Back To The Future , and does the concept bear any relation whatsoever to real science? Released in 1985, Back To The Future wasn't Hollywood's first dalliance with traveling through time, and certainly hasn't been the last. More than three decades later, however, it's still the movie everyone inevitably comes back to when discussing matters of a temporal nature. Back To The Future is also regularly dubbed "the perfect film," and it's not hard to see why. With vibrant characters, fascinating settings and one of the leanest big screen plots you'll find, Marty McFly 's story is somehow both quintessentially 1980s, and utterly timeless.

Fun and adventure might be Back To The Future 's mission statement, but the franchise makes no concessions with its sci-fi elements. Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale developed a tightly woven set of rules for traveling through time, and despite Michael J. Fox's constant meddling, the timeline shenanigans hold up, generally honoring the script's own logic. Back To The Future might be a light-hearted 1980s romp, but to paraphrase Doc Brown, the film's time travel is some serious sh...

Related: Why Back to the Future Recast Elisabeth Shue As Marty's Girlfriend

Throughout Back To The Future and its two worthy sequels, Doc Brown and Marty McFly learn the mechanics of time travel on the job and, more pertinently, find out the consequences of disrupting the past. The audience, meanwhile, discover how Back To The Future 's time-bending gimmick compares to other works of fiction. Here's the full breakdown of Back To The Future 's time travel rules, which perhaps aren't as unrealistic as you might assume ( DeLorean not withstanding).

How Time Travel Works In Back To The Future, Explained

In Back To The Future 's opening act, Doc Brown helpfully explains the requirements for mankind to breach the time barrier - his miraculous new scientific breakthrough. Inside the DeLorean are a set of time circuits and three readouts displaying the current date, the intended destination, and the most recent trip made (a helpful plot device for later). The most important device, however, is Doc Brown's flux capacitor invention, powered by 1.21 gigawatts of electricity. Brown begins Back To The Future by powering the DeLorean with plutonium, but he later turns to alternative sources - a lightning strike, trash in a fusion reactor, and steam, all of which are more environmentally-friendly and less likely to upset Libyan terrorists. Taking the DeLorean to the magic speed of 88mph completes the cocktail of ingredients needed for time travel in Back To The Future 's world.

Side effects of traversing the time-space continuum include the famous fiery tire tracks, and the car turning ice-cold for a brief time. Doc Brown also suggests the DeLorean's steel casing is vital for dispersing the flux capacitor's energy. Were a lesser substitute used, the flux particles might not wrap around the entire vehicle effectively enough to send it through the time barrier.

In Back To The Future 's rule book, there's no difference between venturing into the past and rocketing ahead into the future. Both require the same process, and all Marty needs to do is alter the date on the time circuits. As Doc Brown's initial experiment with Einstein the dog proves, trips in both directions are instantaneous - the mutt is sent one minute into the future with a digital clock, and when he materializes 60 seconds later, the readout is exactly a minute slower than it should be. Furthermore, the traveler never moves in space. When the DeLorean hops through the years, it lands in exactly the same physical location from which it departed.

Related: Why Back To The Future Was Almost Called Space Man From Pluto

Broadly speaking, there are three interpretations of time travel 's effects in fiction. The "what happened, happened" hypothesis posits that altering history is impossible, and any attempt to do so might even cause whatever the traveler is trying to avoid. Examples of this can be found in Lost and Terminator , where John Connor sends his best friend back in time to impregnate his mother. The second variant is the "multiple timelines" idea. Visiting the past and changing history creates a breakaway reality, separate from the original, where any alterations play out. Thanks to Avengers: Endgame , we know the MCU utilizes this format. The last model, and the one Back To The Future subscribes to, is the single, changeable timeline. There are no multiple branch realities, and changing the past has a corresponding effect on the present day.

This is perfectly demonstrated by Back To The Future 's "Twin Pines Mall" sign. As you've no doubt noticed already, the sign alters to "Lone Pine Mall" after Marty visits 1955 and knocks over a tree in Doc Brown's DeLorean. If "what happened, happened" were true, then the sign would've read "Lone Pine" from the start. In the MCU, meanwhile, two signs would exist in different timelines - the original "Twin Pines" and the new "Lone Pine". The shifting sign proves the malleable nature of Marty 's world in Back To The Future , but Robert Zemeckis doesn't go so far as to employ the Butterfly Effect. According to the Butterfly Effect theory, even the slightest change to the past would lead to an unrecognizable future via chain reaction. Back To The Future 's time travel rules are far more localized and specific - i.e. knocking down the tree changes the mall sign, but everything else remains the the same.

How Scientifically Accurate Back To The Future's Time Travel Is

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but time travel is, at the time of writing, not possible. Fortunately, that hasn't deterred more scientifically-minded folk from pondering the possible and plausible of crossing the quantum wake. One hurdle Back To The Future (among many other time travel tales) must overcome is the laws of physics. If a person were to travel faster than the speed of light, they could theoretically move into the future, but the principle doesn't work in reverse, which would rule out traveling into the past entirely. As New Scientist duly points out, wormholes could provide the answer. According to Kip Thorne (physicist, smarter than us), if one side of a wormhole travels at light speed and the other side remains fixed, time begins to dilate, creating a "past" and "future" on either side of the tunnel. Though Thorne's theory is hotly debated, it lends a certain amount of credibility to the DeLorean 's two-way time travel in Back To The Future .

Before etching Robert Zemeckis' name on that Nobel prize, it's worth considering that scientists generally believe the "multiple realities" version of time travel is the most theoretically sound - that when someone changes the past, they're creating an alternate timeline. String Theory has also been used to corroborate the idea of parallel realities, albeit not due to interference from time-meddlers. In Back To The Future , Marty and Doc Brown seem to be going over the same single timeline, erasing and amending history as they see fit (the Lone Pine, Biff's sports almanac, Marty disappearing). This would mean Back To The Future 's time travel perhaps isn't as realistic as it could be - amazing for a film in which every McFly male looks like Michael J. Fox.

Related: Back To The Future: How Old Doc Brown Is In Each Movie

More recently, Germain Tobar of the University of Queensland poured cold water on Back To The Future 's time travel, coming out in support of the "what happened, happened" theory. In layman's terms, Tobar purports that if an attempt to change history were made, the universe would " recalibrate " around the event. To return to Back To The Future 's "Twin Pines Mall" example, Marty would knock down the tree in 1955, and old man Peabody would plant another, hence the sign remains the same, and altering the past is a futile endeavor. Again, the (theoretical) science contradicts Back To The Future ... but does it actually matter?

Although various figures from the scientific community have offered their thoughts on the mechanics of time travel in a real-world scenario, their explanations are deeply speculative, and only cover specific elements of the overall concept (how to reach the past, changing history). As much as scientists might disagree with him, Robert Zemeckis' interpretation of time travel is just as valid as anyone else's until that first trip is made. Any time travel story requires its own fictional set of laws and limitations - something science cannot yet offer. For movies, the priority shouldn't be adhering to reality, but keeping consistent to whatever rules are established, and Back To The Future is, more or less, a success in this regard.

More: Back To The Future: All Three Movies, Ranked Worst To Best

SR Originals
Back to the Future (1985)

Table of Contents
Random Entry
Chronological
Editorial Information
About the SEP
Editorial Board
How to Cite the SEP
Special Characters
Advanced Tools
Support the SEP
PDFs for SEP Friends
Make a Donation
SEPIA for Libraries
Entry Contents

Bibliography

Academic tools.

Friends PDF Preview
Author and Citation Info
Back to Top

Time Travel and Modern Physics

Time travel has been a staple of science fiction. With the advent of general relativity it has been entertained by serious physicists. But, especially in the philosophy literature, there have been arguments that time travel is inherently paradoxical. The most famous paradox is the grandfather paradox: you travel back in time and kill your grandfather, thereby preventing your own existence. To avoid inconsistency some circumstance will have to occur which makes you fail in this attempt to kill your grandfather. Doesn’t this require some implausible constraint on otherwise unrelated circumstances? We examine such worries in the context of modern physics.

1. Paradoxes Lost?

2. topology and constraints, 3. the general possibility of time travel in general relativity, 4. two toy models, 5. slightly more realistic models of time travel, 6. the possibility of time travel redux, 7. even if there are constraints, so what, 8. computational models, 9. quantum mechanics to the rescue, 10. conclusions, other internet resources, related entries.

Supplement: Remarks and Limitations on the Toy Models

Modern physics strips away many aspects of the manifest image of time. Time as it appears in the equations of classical mechanics has no need for a distinguished present moment, for example. Relativity theory leads to even sharper contrasts. It replaces absolute simultaneity, according to which it is possible to unambiguously determine the time order of distant events, with relative simultaneity: extending an “instant of time” throughout space is not unique, but depends on the state of motion of an observer. More dramatically, in general relativity the mathematical properties of time (or better, of spacetime)—its topology and geometry—depend upon how matter is arranged rather than being fixed once and for all. So physics can be, and indeed has to be, formulated without treating time as a universal, fixed background structure. Since general relativity represents gravity through spacetime geometry, the allowed geometries must be as varied as the ways in which matter can be arranged. Alongside geometrical models used to describe the solar system, black holes, and much else, the scope of variation extends to include some exotic structures unlike anything astrophysicists have observed. In particular, there are spacetime geometries with curves that loop back on themselves: closed timelike curves (CTCs), which describe the possible trajectory of an observer who returns exactly back to their earlier state—without any funny business, such as going faster than the speed of light. These geometries satisfy the relevant physical laws, the equations of general relativity, and in that sense time travel is physically possible.

Yet circular time generates paradoxes, familiar from science fiction stories featuring time travel: [ 1 ]

Consistency: Kurt plans to murder his own grandfather Adolph, by traveling along a CTC to an appropriate moment in the past. He is an able marksman, and waits until he has a clear shot at grandpa. Normally he would not miss. Yet if he succeeds, there is no way that he will then exist to plan and carry out the mission. Kurt pulls the trigger: what can happen?
Underdetermination: Suppose that Kurt first travels back in order to give his earlier self a copy of How to Build a Time Machine. This is the same book that allows him to build a time machine, which he then carries with him on his journey to the past. Who wrote the book?
Easy Knowledge: A fan of classical music enhances their computer with a circuit that exploits a CTC. This machine efficiently solves problems at a higher level of computational complexity than conventional computers, leading (among other things) to finding the smallest circuits that can generate Bach’s oeuvre—and to compose new pieces in the same style. Such easy knowledge is at odds with our understanding of our epistemic predicament. (This third paradox has not drawn as much attention.)

The first two paradoxes were once routinely taken to show that solutions with CTCs should be rejected—with charges varying from violating logic, to being “physically unreasonable”, to undermining the notion of free will. Closer analysis of the paradoxes has largely reversed this consensus. Physicists have discovered many solutions with CTCs and have explored their properties in pursuing foundational questions, such as whether physics is compatible with the idea of objective temporal passage (starting with Gödel 1949). Philosophers have also used time travel scenarios to probe questions about, among other things, causation, modality, free will, and identity (see, e.g., Earman 1972 and Lewis’s seminal 1976 paper).

We begin below with Consistency , turning to the other paradoxes in later sections. A standard, stone-walling response is to insist that the past cannot be changed, as a matter of logic, even by a time traveler (e.g., Gödel 1949, Clarke 1977, Horwich 1987). Adolph cannot both die and survive, as a matter of logic, so any scheme to alter the past must fail. In many of the best time travel fictions, the actions of a time traveler are constrained in novel and unexpected ways. Attempts to change the past fail, and they fail, often tragically, in just such a way that they set the stage for the time traveler’s self-defeating journey. The first question is whether there is an analog of the consistent story when it comes to physics in the presence of CTCs. As we will see, there is a remarkable general argument establishing the existence of consistent solutions. Yet a second question persists: why can’t time-traveling Kurt kill his own grandfather? Doesn’t the necessity of failures to change the past put unusual and unexpected constraints on time travelers, or objects that move along CTCs? The same argument shows that there are in fact no constraints imposed by the existence of CTCs, in some cases. After discussing this line of argument, we will turn to the palatability and further implications of such constraints if they are required, and then turn to the implications of quantum mechanics.

Wheeler and Feynman (1949) were the first to claim that the fact that nature is continuous could be used to argue that causal influences from later events to earlier events, as are made possible by time travel, will not lead to paradox without the need for any constraints. Maudlin (1990) showed how to make their argument precise and more general, and argued that nonetheless it was not completely general.

Imagine the following set-up. We start off having a camera with a black and white film ready to take a picture of whatever comes out of the time machine. An object, in fact a developed film, comes out of the time machine. We photograph it, and develop the film. The developed film is subsequently put in the time machine, and set to come out of the time machine at the time the picture is taken. This surely will create a paradox: the developed film will have the opposite distribution of black, white, and shades of gray, from the object that comes out of the time machine. For developed black and white films (i.e., negatives) have the opposite shades of gray from the objects they are pictures of. But since the object that comes out of the time machine is the developed film itself it we surely have a paradox.

However, it does not take much thought to realize that there is no paradox here. What will happen is that a uniformly gray picture will emerge, which produces a developed film that has exactly the same uniform shade of gray. No matter what the sensitivity of the film is, as long as the dependence of the brightness of the developed film depends in a continuous manner on the brightness of the object being photographed, there will be a shade of gray that, when photographed, will produce exactly the same shade of gray on the developed film. This is the essence of Wheeler and Feynman’s idea. Let us first be a bit more precise and then a bit more general.

For simplicity let us suppose that the film is always a uniform shade of gray (i.e., at any time the shade of gray does not vary by location on the film). The possible shades of gray of the film can then be represented by the (real) numbers from 0, representing pure black, to 1, representing pure white.

Let us now distinguish various stages in the chronological order of the life of the film. In stage $S_1$ the film is young; it has just been placed in the camera and is ready to be exposed. It is then exposed to the object that comes out of the time machine. (That object in fact is a later stage of the film itself). By the time we come to stage $S_2$ of the life of the film, it has been developed and is about to enter the time machine. Stage $S_3$ occurs just after it exits the time machine and just before it is photographed. Stage $S_4$ occurs after it has been photographed and before it starts fading away. Let us assume that the film starts out in stage $S_1$ in some uniform shade of gray, and that the only significant change in the shade of gray of the film occurs between stages $S_1$ and $S_2$. During that period it acquires a shade of gray that depends on the shade of gray of the object that was photographed. In other words, the shade of gray that the film acquires at stage $S_2$ depends on the shade of gray it has at stage $S_3$. The influence of the shade of gray of the film at stage $S_3$, on the shade of gray of the film at stage $S_2$, can be represented as a mapping, or function, from the real numbers between 0 and 1 (inclusive), to the real numbers between 0 and 1 (inclusive). Let us suppose that the process of photography is such that if one imagines varying the shade of gray of an object in a smooth, continuous manner then the shade of gray of the developed picture of that object will also vary in a smooth, continuous manner. This implies that the function in question will be a continuous function. Now any continuous function from the real numbers between 0 and 1 (inclusive) to the real numbers between 0 and 1 (inclusive) must map at least one number to itself. One can quickly convince oneself of this by graphing such functions. For one will quickly see that any continuous function $f$ from $[0,1]$ to $[0,1]$ must intersect the line $x=y$ somewhere, and thus there must be at least one point $x$ such that $f(x)=x$. Such points are called fixed points of the function. Now let us think about what such a fixed point represents. It represents a shade of gray such that, when photographed, it will produce a developed film with exactly that same shade of gray. The existence of such a fixed point implies a solution to the apparent paradox.

Let us now be more general and allow color photography. One can represent each possible color of an object (of uniform color) by the proportions of blue, green and red that make up that color. (This is why television screens can produce all possible colors.) Thus one can represent all possible colors of an object by three points on three orthogonal lines $x, y$ and $z$, that is to say, by a point in a three-dimensional cube. This cube is also known as the “Cartesian product” of the three line segments. Now, one can also show that any continuous map from such a cube to itself must have at least one fixed point. So color photography can not be used to create time travel paradoxes either!

Even more generally, consider some system $P$ which, as in the above example, has the following life. It starts in some state $S_1$, it interacts with an object that comes out of a time machine (which happens to be its older self), it travels back in time, it interacts with some object (which happens to be its younger self), and finally it grows old and dies. Let us assume that the set of possible states of $P$ can be represented by a Cartesian product of $n$ closed intervals of the reals, i.e., let us assume that the topology of the state-space of $P$ is isomorphic to a finite Cartesian product of closed intervals of the reals. Let us further assume that the development of $P$ in time, and the dependence of that development on the state of objects that it interacts with, is continuous. Then, by a well-known fixed point theorem in topology (see, e.g., Hocking & Young 1961: 273), no matter what the nature of the interaction is, and no matter what the initial state of the object is, there will be at least one state $S_3$ of the older system (as it emerges from the time travel machine) that will influence the initial state $S_1$ of the younger system (when it encounters the older system) so that, as the younger system becomes older, it develops exactly into state $S_3$. Thus without imposing any constraints on the initial state $S_1$ of the system $P$, we have shown that there will always be perfectly ordinary, non-paradoxical, solutions, in which everything that happens, happens according to the usual laws of development. Of course, there is looped causation, hence presumably also looped explanation, but what do you expect if there is looped time?

Unfortunately, for the fan of time travel, a little reflection suggests that there are systems for which the needed fixed point theorem does not hold. Imagine, for instance, that we have a dial that can only rotate in a plane. We are going to put the dial in the time machine. Indeed we have decided that if we see the later stage of the dial come out of the time machine set at angle $x$, then we will set the dial to $x+90$, and throw it into the time machine. Now it seems we have a paradox, since the mapping that consists of a rotation of all points in a circular state-space by 90 degrees does not have a fixed point. And why wouldn’t some state-spaces have the topology of a circle?

However, we have so far not used another continuity assumption which is also a reasonable assumption. So far we have only made the following demand: the state the dial is in at stage $S_2$ must be a continuous function of the state of the dial at stage $S_3$. But, the state of the dial at stage $S_2$ is arrived at by taking the state of the dial at stage $S_1$, and rotating it over some angle. It is not merely the case that the effect of the interaction, namely the state of the dial at stage $S_2$, should be a continuous function of the cause, namely the state of the dial at stage $S_3$. It is additionally the case that path taken to get there, the way the dial is rotated between stages $S_1$ and $S_2$ must be a continuous function of the state at stage $S_3$. And, rather surprisingly, it turns out that this can not be done. Let us illustrate what the problem is before going to a more general demonstration that there must be a fixed point solution in the dial case.

Forget time travel for the moment. Suppose that you and I each have a watch with a single dial neither of which is running. My watch is set at 12. You are going to announce what your watch is set at. My task is going to be to adjust my watch to yours no matter what announcement you make. And my actions should have a continuous (single valued) dependence on the time that you announce. Surprisingly, this is not possible! For instance, suppose that if you announce “12”, then I achieve that setting on my watch by doing nothing. Now imagine slowly and continuously increasing the announced times, starting at 12. By continuity, I must achieve each of those settings by rotating my dial to the right. If at some point I switch and achieve the announced goal by a rotation of my dial to the left, I will have introduced a discontinuity in my actions, a discontinuity in the actions that I take as a function of the announced angle. So I will be forced, by continuity, to achieve every announcement by rotating the dial to the right. But, this rotation to the right will have to be abruptly discontinued as the announcements grow larger and I eventually approach 12 again, since I achieved 12 by not rotating the dial at all. So, there will be a discontinuity at 12 at the latest. In general, continuity of my actions as a function of announced times can not be maintained throughout if I am to be able to replicate all possible settings. Another way to see the problem is that one can similarly reason that, as one starts with 12, and imagines continuously making the announced times earlier, one will be forced, by continuity, to achieve the announced times by rotating the dial to the left. But the conclusions drawn from the assumption of continuous increases and the assumption of continuous decreases are inconsistent. So we have an inconsistency following from the assumption of continuity and the assumption that I always manage to set my watch to your watch. So, a dial developing according to a continuous dynamics from a given initial state, can not be set up so as to react to a second dial, with which it interacts, in such a way that it is guaranteed to always end up set at the same angle as the second dial. Similarly, it can not be set up so that it is guaranteed to always end up set at 90 degrees to the setting of the second dial. All of this has nothing to do with time travel. However, the impossibility of such set ups is what prevents us from enacting the rotation by 90 degrees that would create paradox in the time travel setting.

Let us now give the positive result that with such dials there will always be fixed point solutions, as long as the dynamics is continuous. Let us call the state of the dial before it interacts with its older self the initial state of the dial. And let us call the state of the dial after it emerges from the time machine the final state of the dial. There is also an intermediate state of the dial, after it interacts with its older self and before it is put into the time machine. We can represent the initial or intermediate states of the dial, before it goes into the time machine, as an angle $x$ in the horizontal plane and the final state of the dial, after it comes out of the time machine, as an angle $y$ in the vertical plane. All possible $\langle x,y\rangle$ pairs can thus be visualized as a torus with each $x$ value picking out a vertical circular cross-section and each $y$ picking out a point on that cross-section. See figure 1 .

Figure 1 [An extended description of figure 1 is in the supplement.]

Suppose that the dial starts at angle $i$ which picks out vertical circle $I$ on the torus. The initial angle $i$ that the dial is at before it encounters its older self, and the set of all possible final angles that the dial can have when it emerges from the time machine is represented by the circle $I$ on the torus (see figure 1 ). Given any possible angle of the emerging dial, the dial initially at angle $i$ will develop to some other angle. One can picture this development by rotating each point on $I$ in the horizontal direction by the relevant amount. Since the rotation has to depend continuously on the angle of the emerging dial, circle $I$ during this development will deform into some loop $L$ on the torus. Loop $L$ thus represents all possible intermediate angles $x$ that the dial is at when it is thrown into the time machine, given that it started at angle $i$ and then encountered a dial (its older self) which was at angle $y$ when it emerged from the time machine. We therefore have consistency if $x=y$ for some $x$ and $y$ on loop $L$. Now, let loop $C$ be the loop which consists of all the points on the torus for which $x=y$. Ring $I$ intersects $C$ at point $\langle i,i\rangle$. Obviously any continuous deformation of $I$ must still intersect $C$ somewhere. So $L$ must intersect $C$ somewhere, say at $\langle j,j\rangle$. But that means that no matter how the development of the dial starting at $I$ depends on the angle of the emerging dial, there will be some angle for the emerging dial such that the dial will develop exactly into that angle (by the time it enters the time machine) under the influence of that emerging dial. This is so no matter what angle one starts with, and no matter how the development depends on the angle of the emerging dial. Thus even for a circular state-space there are no constraints needed other than continuity.

Unfortunately there are state-spaces that escape even this argument. Consider for instance a pointer that can be set to all values between 0 and 1, where 0 and 1 are not possible values. That is, suppose that we have a state-space that is isomorphic to an open set of real numbers. Now suppose that we have a machine that sets the pointer to half the value that the pointer is set at when it emerges from the time machine.

Figure 2 [An extended description of figure 2 is in the supplement.]

Suppose the pointer starts at value $I$. As before we can represent the combination of this initial position and all possible final positions by the line $I$. Under the influence of the pointer coming out of the time machine the pointer value will develop to a value that equals half the value of the final value that it encountered. We can represent this development as the continuous deformation of line $I$ into line $L$, which is indicated by the arrows in figure 2 . This development is fully continuous. Points $\langle x,y\rangle$ on line $I$ represent the initial position $x=I$ of the (young) pointer, and the position $y$ of the older pointer as it emerges from the time machine. Points $\langle x,y\rangle$ on line $L$ represent the position $x$ that the younger pointer should develop into, given that it encountered the older pointer emerging from the time machine set at position $y$. Since the pointer is designed to develop to half the value of the pointer that it encounters, the line $L$ corresponds to $x=1/2 y$. We have consistency if there is some point such that it develops into that point, if it encounters that point. Thus, we have consistency if there is some point $\langle x,y\rangle$ on line $L$ such that $x=y$. However, there is no such point: lines $L$ and $C$ do not intersect. Thus there is no consistent solution, despite the fact that the dynamics is fully continuous.

Of course if 0 were a possible value, $L$ and $C$ would intersect at 0. This is surprising and strange: adding one point to the set of possible values of a quantity here makes the difference between paradox and peace. One might be tempted to just add the extra point to the state-space in order to avoid problems. After all, one might say, surely no measurements could ever tell us whether the set of possible values includes that exact point or not. Unfortunately there can be good theoretical reasons for supposing that some quantity has a state-space that is open: the set of all possible speeds of massive objects in special relativity surely is an open set, since it includes all speeds up to, but not including, the speed of light. Quantities that have possible values that are not bounded also lead to counter examples to the presented fixed point argument. And it is not obvious to us why one should exclude such possibilities. So the argument that no constraints are needed is not fully general.

An interesting question of course is: exactly for which state-spaces must there be such fixed points? The arguments above depend on a well-known fixed point theorem (due to Schauder) that guarantees the existence of a fixed point for compact, convex state spaces. We do not know what subsequent extensions of this result imply regarding fixed points for a wider variety of systems, or whether there are other general results along these lines. (See Kutach 2003 for more on this issue.)

A further interesting question is whether this line of argument is sufficient to resolve Consistency (see also Dowe 2007). When they apply, these results establish the existence of a solution, such as the shade of uniform gray in the first example. But physicists routinely demand more than merely the existence of a solution, namely that solutions to the equations are stable—such that “small” changes of the initial state lead to “small” changes of the resulting trajectory. (Clarifying the two senses of “small” in this statement requires further work, specifying the relevant topology.) Stability in this sense underwrites the possibility of applying equations to real systems given our inability to fix initial states with indefinite precision. (See Fletcher 2020 for further discussion.) The fixed point theorems guarantee that for an initial state $S_1$ there is a solution, but this solution may not be “close” to the solution for a nearby initial state, $S'$. We are not aware of any proofs that the solutions guaranteed to exist by the fixed point theorems are also stable in this sense.

Time travel has recently been discussed quite extensively in the context of general relativity. General relativity places few constraints on the global structure of space and time. This flexibility leads to a possibility first described in print by Hermann Weyl:

Every world-point is the origin of the double-cone of the active future and the passive past [i.e., the two lobes of the light cone]. Whereas in the special theory of relativity these two portions are separated by an intervening region, it is certainly possible in the present case [i.e., general relativity] for the cone of the active future to overlap with that of the passive past; so that, in principle, it is possible to experience events now that will in part be an effect of my future resolves and actions. Moreover, it is not impossible for a world-line (in particular, that of my body), although it has a timelike direction at every point, to return to the neighborhood of a point which it has already once passed through. (Weyl 1918/1920 [1952: 274])

A time-like curve is simply a space-time trajectory such that the speed of light is never equaled or exceeded along this trajectory. Time-like curves represent possible trajectories of ordinary objects. In general relativity a curve that is everywhere timelike locally can nonetheless loop back on itself, forming a CTC. Weyl makes the point vividly in terms of the light cones: along such a curve, the future lobe of the light cone (the “active future”) intersects the past lobe of the light cone (the “passive past”). Traveling along such a curve one would never exceed the speed of light, and yet after a certain amount of (proper) time one would return to a point in space-time that one previously visited. Or, by staying close to such a CTC, one could come arbitrarily close to a point in space-time that one previously visited. General relativity, in a straightforward sense, allows time travel: there appear to be many space-times compatible with the fundamental equations of general relativity in which there are CTC’s. Space-time, for instance, could have a Minkowski metric everywhere, and yet have CTC’s everywhere by having the temporal dimension (topologically) rolled up as a circle. Or, one can have wormhole connections between different parts of space-time which allow one to enter “mouth $A$” of such a wormhole connection, travel through the wormhole, exit the wormhole at “mouth $B$” and re-enter “mouth $A$” again. CTCs can even arise when the spacetime is topologically $\mathbb{R}^4$, due to the “tilting” of light cones produced by rotating matter (as in Gödel 1949’s spacetime).

General relativity thus appears to provide ample opportunity for time travel. Note that just because there are CTC’s in a space-time, this does not mean that one can get from any point in the space-time to any other point by following some future directed timelike curve—there may be insurmountable practical obstacles. In Gödel’s spacetime, it is the case that there are CTCs passing through every point in the spacetime. Yet these CTCs are not geodesics, so traversing them requires acceleration. Calculations of the minimal fuel required to travel along the appropriate curve should discourage any would-be time travelers (Malament 1984, 1985; Manchak 2011). But more generally CTCs may be confined to smaller regions; some parts of space-time can have CTC’s while other parts do not. Let us call the part of a space-time that has CTC’s the “time travel region” of that space-time, while calling the rest of that space-time the “normal region”. More precisely, the “time travel region” consists of all the space-time points $p$ such that there exists a (non-zero length) timelike curve that starts at $p$ and returns to $p$. Now let us turn to examining space-times with CTC’s a bit more closely for potential problems.

In order to get a feeling for the sorts of implications that closed timelike curves can have, it may be useful to consider two simple models. In space-times with closed timelike curves the traditional initial value problem cannot be framed in the usual way. For it presupposes the existence of Cauchy surfaces, and if there are CTCs then no Cauchy surface exists. (A Cauchy surface is a spacelike surface such that every inextendable timelike curve crosses it exactly once. One normally specifies initial conditions by giving the conditions on such a surface.) Nonetheless, if the topological complexities of the manifold are appropriately localized, we can come quite close. Let us call an edgeless spacelike surface $S$ a quasi-Cauchy surface if it divides the rest of the manifold into two parts such that

every point in the manifold can be connected by a timelike curve to $S$, and
any timelike curve which connects a point in one region to a point in the other region intersects $S$ exactly once.

It is obvious that a quasi-Cauchy surface must entirely inhabit the normal region of the space-time; if any point $p$ of $S$ is in the time travel region, then any timelike curve which intersects $p$ can be extended to a timelike curve which intersects $S$ near $p$ again. In extreme cases of time travel, a model may have no normal region at all (e.g., Minkowski space-time rolled up like a cylinder in a time-like direction), in which case our usual notions of temporal precedence will not apply. But temporal anomalies like wormholes (and time machines) can be sufficiently localized to permit the existence of quasi-Cauchy surfaces.

Given a timelike orientation, a quasi-Cauchy surface unproblematically divides the manifold into its past (i.e., all points that can be reached by past-directed timelike curves from $S)$ and its future (ditto mutatis mutandis ). If the whole past of $S$ is in the normal region of the manifold, then $S$ is a partial Cauchy surface : every inextendable timelike curve which exists to the past of $S$ intersects $S$ exactly once, but (if there is time travel in the future) not every inextendable timelike curve which exists to the future of $S$ intersects $S$. Now we can ask a particularly clear question: consider a manifold which contains a time travel region, but also has a partial Cauchy surface $S$, such that all of the temporal funny business is to the future of $S$. If all you could see were $S$ and its past, you would not know that the space-time had any time travel at all. The question is: are there any constraints on the sort of data which can be put on $S$ and continued to a global solution of the dynamics which are different from the constraints (if any) on the data which can be put on a Cauchy surface in a simply connected manifold and continued to a global solution? If there is time travel to our future, might we we able to tell this now, because of some implied oddity in the arrangement of present things?

It is not at all surprising that there might be constraints on the data which can be put on a locally space-like surface which passes through the time travel region: after all, we never think we can freely specify what happens on a space-like surface and on another such surface to its future, but in this case the surface at issue lies to its own future. But if there were particular constraints for data on a partial Cauchy surface then we would apparently need to have to rule out some sorts of otherwise acceptable states on $S$ if there is to be time travel to the future of $S$. We then might be able to establish that there will be no time travel in the future by simple inspection of the present state of the universe. As we will see, there is reason to suspect that such constraints on the partial Cauchy surface are non-generic. But we are getting ahead of ourselves: first let’s consider the effect of time travel on a very simple dynamics.

The simplest possible example is the Newtonian theory of perfectly elastic collisions among equally massive particles in one spatial dimension. The space-time is two-dimensional, so we can represent it initially as the Euclidean plane, and the dynamics is completely specified by two conditions. When particles are traveling freely, their world lines are straight lines in the space-time, and when two particles collide, they exchange momenta, so the collision looks like an “$X$” in space-time, with each particle changing its momentum at the impact. [ 2 ] The dynamics is purely local, in that one can check that a set of world-lines constitutes a model of the dynamics by checking that the dynamics is obeyed in every arbitrarily small region. It is also trivial to generate solutions from arbitrary initial data if there are no CTCs: given the initial positions and momenta of a set of particles, one simply draws a straight line from each particle in the appropriate direction and continues it indefinitely. Once all the lines are drawn, the worldline of each particle can be traced from collision to collision. The boundary value problem for this dynamics is obviously well-posed: any set of data at an instant yields a unique global solution, constructed by the method sketched above.

What happens if we change the topology of the space-time by hand to produce CTCs? The simplest way to do this is depicted in figure 3 : we cut and paste the space-time so it is no longer simply connected by identifying the line $L-$ with the line $L+$. Particles “going in” to $L+$ from below “emerge” from $L-$ , and particles “going in” to $L-$ from below “emerge” from $L+$.

Figure 3: Inserting CTCs by Cut and Paste. [An extended description of figure 3 is in the supplement.]

How is the boundary-value problem changed by this alteration in the space-time? Before the cut and paste, we can put arbitrary data on the simultaneity slice $S$ and continue it to a unique solution. After the change in topology, $S$ is no longer a Cauchy surface, since a CTC will never intersect it, but it is a partial Cauchy surface. So we can ask two questions. First, can arbitrary data on $S$ always be continued to a global solution? Second, is that solution unique? If the answer to the first question is $no$, then we have a backward-temporal constraint: the existence of the region with CTCs places constraints on what can happen on $S$ even though that region lies completely to the future of $S$. If the answer to the second question is $no$, then we have an odd sort of indeterminism, analogous to the unwritten book: the complete physical state on $S$ does not determine the physical state in the future, even though the local dynamics is perfectly deterministic and even though there is no other past edge to the space-time region in $S$’s future (i.e., there is nowhere else for boundary values to come from which could influence the state of the region).

In this case the answer to the first question is yes and to the second is no : there are no constraints on the data which can be put on $S$, but those data are always consistent with an infinitude of different global solutions. The easy way to see that there always is a solution is to construct the minimal solution in the following way. Start drawing straight lines from $S$ as required by the initial data. If a line hits $L-$ from the bottom, just continue it coming out of the top of $L+$ in the appropriate place, and if a line hits $L+$ from the bottom, continue it emerging from $L-$ at the appropriate place. Figure 4 represents the minimal solution for a single particle which enters the time-travel region from the left:

Figure 4: The Minimal Solution. [An extended description of figure 4 is in the supplement.]

The particle “travels back in time” three times. It is obvious that this minimal solution is a global solution, since the particle always travels inertially.

But the same initial state on $S$ is also consistent with other global solutions. The new requirement imposed by the topology is just that the data going into $L+$ from the bottom match the data coming out of $L-$ from the top, and the data going into $L-$ from the bottom match the data coming out of $L+$ from the top. So we can add any number of vertical lines connecting $L-$ and $L+$ to a solution and still have a solution. For example, adding a few such lines to the minimal solution yields:

Figure 5: A Non-Minimal Solution. [An extended description of figure 5 is in the supplement.]

The particle now collides with itself twice: first before it reaches $L+$ for the first time, and again shortly before it exits the CTC region. From the particle’s point of view, it is traveling to the right at a constant speed until it hits an older version of itself and comes to rest. It remains at rest until it is hit from the right by a younger version of itself, and then continues moving off, and the same process repeats later. It is clear that this is a global model of the dynamics, and that any number of distinct models could be generating by varying the number and placement of vertical lines.

Knowing the data on $S$, then, gives us only incomplete information about how things will go for the particle. We know that the particle will enter the CTC region, and will reach $L+$, we know that it will be the only particle in the universe, we know exactly where and with what speed it will exit the CTC region. But we cannot determine how many collisions the particle will undergo (if any), nor how long (in proper time) it will stay in the CTC region. If the particle were a clock, we could not predict what time it would indicate when exiting the region. Furthermore, the dynamics gives us no handle on what to think of the various possibilities: there are no probabilities assigned to the various distinct possible outcomes.

Changing the topology has changed the mathematics of the situation in two ways, which tend to pull in opposite directions. On the one hand, $S$ is no longer a Cauchy surface, so it is perhaps not surprising that data on $S$ do not suffice to fix a unique global solution. But on the other hand, there is an added constraint: data “coming out” of $L-$ must exactly match data “going in” to $L+$, even though what comes out of $L-$ helps to determine what goes into $L+$. This added consistency constraint tends to cut down on solutions, although in this case the additional constraint is more than outweighed by the freedom to consider various sorts of data on ${L+}/{L-}$.

The fact that the extra freedom outweighs the extra constraint also points up one unexpected way that the supposed paradoxes of time travel may be overcome. Let’s try to set up a paradoxical situation using the little closed time loop above. If we send a single particle into the loop from the left and do nothing else, we know exactly where it will exit the right side of the time travel region. Now suppose we station someone at the other side of the region with the following charge: if the particle should come out on the right side, the person is to do something to prevent the particle from going in on the left in the first place. In fact, this is quite easy to do: if we send a particle in from the right, it seems that it can exit on the left and deflect the incoming left-hand particle.

Carrying on our reflection in this way, we further realize that if the particle comes out on the right, we might as well send it back in order to deflect itself from entering in the first place. So all we really need to do is the following: set up a perfectly reflecting particle mirror on the right-hand side of the time travel region, and launch the particle from the left so that— if nothing interferes with it —it will just barely hit $L+$. Our paradox is now apparently complete. If, on the one hand, nothing interferes with the particle it will enter the time-travel region on the left, exit on the right, be reflected from the mirror, re-enter from the right, and come out on the left to prevent itself from ever entering. So if it enters, it gets deflected and never enters. On the other hand, if it never enters then nothing goes in on the left, so nothing comes out on the right, so nothing is reflected back, and there is nothing to deflect it from entering. So if it doesn’t enter, then there is nothing to deflect it and it enters. If it enters, then it is deflected and doesn’t enter; if it doesn’t enter then there is nothing to deflect it and it enters: paradox complete.

But at least one solution to the supposed paradox is easy to construct: just follow the recipe for constructing the minimal solution, continuing the initial trajectory of the particle (reflecting it the mirror in the obvious way) and then read of the number and trajectories of the particles from the resulting diagram. We get the result of figure 6 :

Figure 6: Resolving the “Paradox”. [An extended description of figure 6 is in the supplement.]

As we can see, the particle approaching from the left never reaches $L+$: it is deflected first by a particle which emerges from $L-$. But it is not deflected by itself , as the paradox suggests, it is deflected by another particle. Indeed, there are now four particles in the diagram: the original particle and three particles which are confined to closed time-like curves. It is not the leftmost particle which is reflected by the mirror, nor even the particle which deflects the leftmost particle; it is another particle altogether.

The paradox gets it traction from an incorrect presupposition. If there is only one particle in the world at $S$ then there is only one particle which could participate in an interaction in the time travel region: the single particle would have to interact with its earlier (or later) self. But there is no telling what might come out of $L-$: the only requirement is that whatever comes out must match what goes in at $L+$. So if you go to the trouble of constructing a working time machine, you should be prepared for a different kind of disappointment when you attempt to go back and kill yourself: you may be prevented from entering the machine in the first place by some completely unpredictable entity which emerges from it. And once again a peculiar sort of indeterminism appears: if there are many self-consistent things which could prevent you from entering, there is no telling which is even likely to materialize. This is just like the case of the unwritten book: the book is never written, so nothing determines what fills its pages.

So when the freedom to put data on $L-$ outweighs the constraint that the same data go into $L+$, instead of paradox we get an embarrassment of riches: many solution consistent with the data on $S$, or many possible books. To see a case where the constraint “outweighs” the freedom, we need to construct a very particular, and frankly artificial, dynamics and topology. Consider the space of all linear dynamics for a scalar field on a lattice. (The lattice can be though of as a simple discrete space-time.) We will depict the space-time lattice as a directed graph. There is to be a scalar field defined at every node of the graph, whose value at a given node depends linearly on the values of the field at nodes which have arrows which lead to it. Each edge of the graph can be assigned a weighting factor which determines how much the field at the input node contributes to the field at the output node. If we name the nodes by the letters a , b , c , etc., and the edges by their endpoints in the obvious way, then we can label the weighting factors by the edges they are associated with in an equally obvious way.

Suppose that the graph of the space-time lattice is acyclic , as in figure 7 . (A graph is Acyclic if one can not travel in the direction of the arrows and go in a loop.)

Figure 7: An Acyclic Lattice. [An extended description of figure 7 is in the supplement.]

It is easy to regard a set of nodes as the analog of a Cauchy surface, e.g., the set $\{a, b, c\}$, and it is obvious if arbitrary data are put on those nodes the data will generate a unique solution in the future. [ 3 ] If the value of the field at node $a$ is 3 and at node $b$ is 7, then its value at node $d$ will be $3W_{ad}$ and its value at node $e$ will be $3W_{ae} + 7W_{be}$. By varying the weighting factors we can adjust the dynamics, but in an acyclic graph the future evolution of the field will always be unique.

Let us now again artificially alter the topology of the lattice to admit CTCs, so that the graph now is cyclic. One of the simplest such graphs is depicted in figure 8 : there are now paths which lead from $z$ back to itself, e.g., $z$ to $y$ to $z$.

Figure 8: Time Travel on a Lattice. [An extended description of figure 8 is in the supplement.]

Can we now put arbitrary data on $v$ and $w$, and continue that data to a global solution? Will the solution be unique?

In the generic case, there will be a solution and the solution will be unique. The equations for the value of the field at $x, y$, and $z$ are:

Solving these equations for $z$ yields

which gives a unique value for $z$ in the generic case. But looking at the space of all possible dynamics for this lattice (i.e., the space of all possible weighting factors), we find a singularity in the case where $1-W_{zx}W_{xz} - W_{zy}W_{yz} = 0$. If we choose weighting factors in just this way, then arbitrary data at $v$ and $w$ cannot be continued to a global solution. Indeed, if the scalar field is everywhere non-negative, then this particular choice of dynamics puts ironclad constraints on the value of the field at $v$ and $w$: the field there must be zero (assuming $W_{vx}$ and $W_{wy}$ to be non-zero), and similarly all nodes in their past must have field value zero. If the field can take negative values, then the values at $v$ and $w$ must be so chosen that $vW_{vx}W_{xz} = -wW_{wy}W_{yz}$. In either case, the field values at $v$ and $w$ are severely constrained by the existence of the CTC region even though these nodes lie completely to the past of that region. It is this sort of constraint which we find to be unlike anything which appears in standard physics.

Our toy models suggest three things. The first is that it may be impossible to prove in complete generality that arbitrary data on a partial Cauchy surface can always be continued to a global solution: our artificial case provides an example where it cannot. The second is that such odd constraints are not likely to be generic: we had to delicately fine-tune the dynamics to get a problem. The third is that the opposite problem, namely data on a partial Cauchy surface being consistent with many different global solutions, is likely to be generic: we did not have to do any fine-tuning to get this result.

This third point leads to a peculiar sort of indeterminism, illustrated by the case of the unwritten book: the entire state on $S$ does not determine what will happen in the future even though the local dynamics is deterministic and there are no other “edges” to space-time from which data could influence the result. What happens in the time travel region is constrained but not determined by what happens on $S$, and the dynamics does not even supply any probabilities for the various possibilities. The example of the photographic negative discussed in section 2, then, seems likely to be unusual, for in that case there is a unique fixed point for the dynamics, and the set-up plus the dynamical laws determine the outcome. In the generic case one would rather expect multiple fixed points, with no room for anything to influence, even probabilistically, which would be realized. (See the supplement on

Remarks and Limitations on the Toy Models .

It is ironic that time travel should lead generically not to contradictions or to constraints (in the normal region) but to underdetermination of what happens in the time travel region by what happens everywhere else (an underdetermination tied neither to a probabilistic dynamics nor to a free edge to space-time). The traditional objection to time travel is that it leads to contradictions: there is no consistent way to complete an arbitrarily constructed story about how the time traveler intends to act. Instead, though, it appears that the more significant problem is underdetermination: the story can be consistently completed in many different ways.

Echeverria, Klinkhammer, and Thorne (1991) considered the case of 3-dimensional single hard spherical ball that can go through a single time travel wormhole so as to collide with its younger self.

Figure 9 [An extended description of figure 9 is in the supplement.]

The threat of paradox in this case arises in the following form. Consider the initial trajectory of a ball as it approaches the time travel region. For some initial trajectories, the ball does not undergo a collision before reaching mouth 1, but upon exiting mouth 2 it will collide with its earlier self. This leads to a contradiction if the collision is strong enough to knock the ball off its trajectory and deflect it from entering mouth 1. Of course, the Wheeler-Feynman strategy is to look for a “glancing blow” solution: a collision which will produce exactly the (small) deviation in trajectory of the earlier ball that produces exactly that collision. Are there always such solutions? [ 4 ]

Echeverria, Klinkhammer & Thorne found a large class of initial trajectories that have consistent “glancing blow” continuations, and found none that do not (but their search was not completely general). They did not produce a rigorous proof that every initial trajectory has a consistent continuation, but suggested that it is very plausible that every initial trajectory has a consistent continuation. That is to say, they have made it very plausible that, in the billiard ball wormhole case, the time travel structure of such a wormhole space-time does not result in constraints on states on spacelike surfaces in the non-time travel region.

In fact, as one might expect from our discussion in the previous section, they found the opposite problem from that of inconsistency: they found underdetermination. For a large class of initial trajectories there are multiple different consistent “glancing blow” continuations of that trajectory (many of which involve multiple wormhole traversals). For example, if one initially has a ball that is traveling on a trajectory aimed straight between the two mouths, then one obvious solution is that the ball passes between the two mouths and never time travels. But another solution is that the younger ball gets knocked into mouth 1 exactly so as to come out of mouth 2 and produce that collision. Echeverria et al. do not note the possibility (which we pointed out in the previous section) of the existence of additional balls in the time travel region. We conjecture (but have no proof) that for every initial trajectory of $A$ there are some, and generically many, multiple-ball continuations.

Friedman, Morris, et al. (1990) examined the case of source-free non-self-interacting scalar fields traveling through such a time travel wormhole and found that no constraints on initial conditions in the non-time travel region are imposed by the existence of such time travel wormholes. In general there appear to be no known counter examples to the claim that in “somewhat realistic” time-travel space-times with a partial Cauchy surface there are no constraints imposed on the state on such a partial Cauchy surface by the existence of CTC’s. (See, e.g., Friedman & Morris 1991; Thorne 1994; Earman 1995; Earman, Smeenk, & Wüthrich 2009; and Dowe 2007.)

How about the issue of constraints in the time travel region $T$? Prima facie , constraints in such a region would not appear to be surprising. But one might still expect that there should be no constraints on states on a spacelike surface, provided one keeps the surface “small enough”. In the physics literature the following question has been asked: for any point $p$ in $T$, and any space-like surface $S$ that includes $p$ is there a neighborhood $E$ of $p$ in $S$ such that any solution on $E$ can be extended to a solution on the whole space-time? With respect to this question, there are some simple models in which one has this kind of extendability of local solutions to global ones, and some simple models in which one does not have such extendability, with no clear general pattern. The technical mathematical problems are amplified by the more conceptual problem of what it might mean to say that one could create a situation which forces the creation of closed timelike curves. (See, e.g., Yurtsever 1990; Friedman, Morris, et al. 1990; Novikov 1992; Earman 1995; and Earman, Smeenk, & Wüthrich 2009). What are we to think of all of this?

The toy models above all treat billiard balls, fields, and other objects propagating through a background spacetime with CTCs. Even if we can show that a consistent solution exists, there is a further question: what kind of matter and dynamics could generate CTCs to begin with? There are various solutions of Einstein’s equations with CTCs, but how do these exotic spacetimes relate to the models actually used in describing the world? In other words, what positive reasons might we have to take CTCs seriously as a feature of the actual universe, rather than an exotic possibility of primarily mathematical interest?

We should distinguish two different kinds of “possibility” that we might have in mind in posing such questions (following Stein 1970). First, we can consider a solution as a candidate cosmological model, describing the (large-scale gravitational degrees of freedom of the) entire universe. The case for ruling out spacetimes with CTCs as potential cosmological models strikes us as, surprisingly, fairly weak. Physicists used to simply rule out solutions with CTCs as unreasonable by fiat, due to the threat of paradoxes, which we have dismantled above. But it is also challenging to make an observational case. Observations tell us very little about global features, such as the existence of CTCs, because signals can only reach an observer from a limited region of spacetime, called the past light cone. Our past light cone—and indeed the collection of all the past light cones for possible observers in a given spacetime—can be embedded in spacetimes with quite different global features (Malament 1977, Manchak 2009). This undercuts the possibility of using observations to constrain global topology, including (among other things) ruling out the existence of CTCs.

Yet the case in favor of taking cosmological models with CTCs seriously is also not particularly strong. Some solutions used to describe black holes, which are clearly relevant in a variety of astrophysical contexts, include CTCs. But the question of whether the CTCs themselves play an essential representational role is subtle: the CTCs arise in the maximal extensions of these solutions, and can plausibly be regarded as extraneous to successful applications. Furthermore, many of the known solutions with CTCs have symmetries, raising the possibility that CTCs are not a stable or robust feature. Slight departures from symmetry may lead to a solution without CTCs, suggesting that the CTCs may be an artifact of an idealized model.

The second sense of possibility regards whether “reasonable” initial conditions can be shown to lead to, or not to lead to, the formation of CTCs. As with the toy models above, suppose that we have a partial Cauchy surface $S$, such that all the temporal funny business lies to the future. Rather than simply assuming that there is a region with CTCs to the future, we can ask instead whether it is possible to create CTCs by manipulating matter in the initial, well-behaved region—that is, whether it is possible to build a time machine. Several physicists have pursued “chronology protection theorems” aiming to show that the dynamics of general relativity (or some other aspects of physics) rules this out, and to clarify why this is the case. The proof of such a theorem would justify neglecting solutions with CTCs as a source of insight into the nature of time in the actual world. But as of yet there are several partial results that do not fully settle the question. One further intriguing possibility is that even if general relativity by itself does protect chronology, it may not be possible to formulate a sensible theory describing matter and fields in solutions with CTCs. (See SEP entry on Time Machines; Smeenk and Wüthrich 2011 for more.)

There is a different question regarding the limitations of these toy models. The toy models and related examples show that there are consistent solutions for simple systems in the presence of CTCs. As usual we have made the analysis tractable by building toy models, selecting only a few dynamical degrees of freedom and tracking their evolution. But there is a large gap between the systems we have described and the time travel stories they evoke, with Kurt traveling along a CTC with murderous intentions. In particular, many features of the manifest image of time are tied to the thermodynamical properties of macroscopic systems. Rovelli (unpublished) considers a extremely simple system to illustrate the problem: can a clock move along a CTC? A clock consists of something in periodic motion, such as a pendulum bob, and something that counts the oscillations, such as an escapement mechanism. The escapement mechanism cannot work without friction; this requires dissipation and increasing entropy. For a clock that counts oscillations as it moves along a time-like trajectory, the entropy must be a monotonically increasing function. But that is obviously incompatible with the clock returning to precisely the same state at some future time as it completes a loop. The point generalizes, obviously, to imply that anything like a human, with memory and agency, cannot move along a CTC.

Since it is not obvious that one can rid oneself of all constraints in realistic models, let us examine the argument that time travel is implausible, and we should think it unlikely to exist in our world, in so far as it implies such constraints. The argument goes something like the following. In order to satisfy such constraints one needs some pre-established divine harmony between the global (time travel) structure of space-time and the distribution of particles and fields on space-like surfaces in it. But it is not plausible that the actual world, or any world even remotely like ours, is constructed with divine harmony as part of the plan. In fact, one might argue, we have empirical evidence that conditions in any spatial region can vary quite arbitrarily. So we have evidence that such constraints, whatever they are, do not in fact exist in our world. So we have evidence that there are no closed time-like lines in our world or one remotely like it. We will now examine this argument in more detail by presenting four possible responses, with counterresponses, to this argument.

Response 1. There is nothing implausible or new about such constraints. For instance, if the universe is spatially closed, there has to be enough matter to produce the needed curvature, and this puts constraints on the matter distribution on a space-like hypersurface. Thus global space-time structure can quite unproblematically constrain matter distributions on space-like hypersurfaces in it. Moreover we have no realistic idea what these constraints look like, so we hardly can be said to have evidence that they do not obtain.

Counterresponse 1. Of course there are constraining relations between the global structure of space-time and the matter in it. The Einstein equations relate curvature of the manifold to the matter distribution in it. But what is so strange and implausible about the constraints imposed by the existence of closed time-like curves is that these constraints in essence have nothing to do with the Einstein equations. When investigating such constraints one typically treats the particles and/or field in question as test particles and/or fields in a given space-time, i.e., they are assumed not to affect the metric of space-time in any way. In typical space-times without closed time-like curves this means that one has, in essence, complete freedom of matter distribution on a space-like hypersurface. (See response 2 for some more discussion of this issue). The constraints imposed by the possibility of time travel have a quite different origin and are implausible. In the ordinary case there is a causal interaction between matter and space-time that results in relations between global structure of space-time and the matter distribution in it. In the time travel case there is no such causal story to be told: there simply has to be some pre-established harmony between the global space-time structure and the matter distribution on some space-like surfaces. This is implausible.

Response 2. Constraints upon matter distributions are nothing new. For instance, Maxwell’s equations constrain electric fields $\boldsymbol{E}$ on an initial surface to be related to the (simultaneous) charge density distribution $\varrho$ by the equation $\varrho = \text{div}(\boldsymbol{E})$. (If we assume that the $E$ field is generated solely by the charge distribution, this conditions amounts to requiring that the $E$ field at any point in space simply be the one generated by the charge distribution according to Coulomb’s inverse square law of electrostatics.) This is not implausible divine harmony. Such constraints can hold as a matter of physical law. Moreover, if we had inferred from the apparent free variation of conditions on spatial regions that there could be no such constraints we would have mistakenly inferred that $\varrho = \text{div}(\boldsymbol{E})$ could not be a law of nature.

Counterresponse 2. The constraints imposed by the existence of closed time-like lines are of quite a different character from the constraint imposed by $\varrho = \text{div}(\boldsymbol{E})$. The constraints imposed by $\varrho = \text{div}(\boldsymbol{E})$ on the state on a space-like hypersurface are:

local constraints (i.e., to check whether the constraint holds in a region you just need to see whether it holds at each point in the region),
quite independent of the global space-time structure,
quite independent of how the space-like surface in question is embedded in a given space-time, and
very simply and generally stateable.

On the other hand, the consistency constraints imposed by the existence of closed time-like curves (i) are not local, (ii) are dependent on the global structure of space-time, (iii) depend on the location of the space-like surface in question in a given space-time, and (iv) appear not to be simply stateable other than as the demand that the state on that space-like surface embedded in such and such a way in a given space-time, do not lead to inconsistency. On some views of laws (e.g., David Lewis’ view) this plausibly implies that such constraints, even if they hold, could not possibly be laws. But even if one does not accept such a view of laws, one could claim that the bizarre features of such constraints imply that it is implausible that such constraints hold in our world or in any world remotely like ours.

Response 3. It would be strange if there are constraints in the non-time travel region. It is not strange if there are constraints in the time travel region. They should be explained in terms of the strange, self-interactive, character of time travel regions. In this region there are time-like trajectories from points to themselves. Thus the state at such a point, in such a region, will, in a sense, interact with itself. It is a well-known fact that systems that interact with themselves will develop into an equilibrium state, if there is such an equilibrium state, or else will develop towards some singularity. Normally, of course, self-interaction isn’t true instantaneous self-interaction, but consists of a feed-back mechanism that takes time. But in time travel regions something like true instantaneous self-interaction occurs. This explains why constraints on states occur in such time travel regions: the states “ ab initio ” have to be “equilibrium states”. Indeed in a way this also provides some picture of why indeterminism occurs in time travel regions: at the onset of self-interaction states can fork into different equi-possible equilibrium states.

Counterresponse 3. This is explanation by woolly analogy. It all goes to show that time travel leads to such bizarre consequences that it is unlikely that it occurs in a world remotely like ours.

Response 4. All of the previous discussion completely misses the point. So far we have been taking the space-time structure as given, and asked the question whether a given time travel space-time structure imposes constraints on states on (parts of) space-like surfaces. However, space-time and matter interact. Suppose that one is in a space-time with closed time-like lines, such that certain counterfactual distributions of matter on some neighborhood of a point $p$ are ruled out if one holds that space-time structure fixed. One might then ask

Why does the actual state near $p$ in fact satisfy these constraints? By what divine luck or plan is this local state compatible with the global space-time structure? What if conditions near $p$ had been slightly different?

And one might take it that the lack of normal answers to these questions indicates that it is very implausible that our world, or any remotely like it, is such a time travel universe. However the proper response to these question is the following. There are no constraints in any significant sense. If they hold they hold as a matter of accidental fact, not of law. There is no more explanation of them possible than there is of any contingent fact. Had conditions in a neighborhood of $p$ been otherwise, the global structure of space-time would have been different. So what? The only question relevant to the issue of constraints is whether an arbitrary state on an arbitrary spatial surface $S$ can always be embedded into a space-time such that that state on $S$ consistently extends to a solution on the entire space-time.

But we know the answer to that question. A well-known theorem in general relativity says the following: any initial data set on a three dimensional manifold $S$ with positive definite metric has a unique embedding into a maximal space-time in which $S$ is a Cauchy surface (see, e.g., Geroch & Horowitz 1979: 284 for more detail), i.e., there is a unique largest space-time which has $S$ as a Cauchy surface and contains a consistent evolution of the initial value data on $S$. Now since $S$ is a Cauchy surface this space-time does not have closed time like curves. But it may have extensions (in which $S$ is not a Cauchy surface) which include closed timelike curves, indeed it may be that any maximal extension of it would include closed timelike curves. (This appears to be the case for extensions of states on certain surfaces of Taub-NUT space-times. See Earman, Smeenk, & Wüthrich 2009). But these extensions, of course, will be consistent. So properly speaking, there are no constraints on states on space-like surfaces. Nonetheless the space-time in which these are embedded may or may not include closed time-like curves.

Counterresponse 4. This, in essence, is the stonewalling answer which we indicated in section 1. However, whether or not you call the constraints imposed by a given space-time on distributions of matter on certain space-like surfaces “genuine constraints”, whether or not they can be considered lawlike, and whether or not they need to be explained, the existence of such constraints can still be used to argue that time travel worlds are so bizarre that it is implausible that our world or any world remotely like ours is a time travel world.

Suppose that one is in a time travel world. Suppose that given the global space-time structure of this world, there are constraints imposed upon, say, the state of motion of a ball on some space-like surface when it is treated as a test particle, i.e., when it is assumed that the ball does not affect the metric properties of the space-time it is in. (There is lots of other matter that, via the Einstein equation, corresponds exactly to the curvature that there is everywhere in this time travel worlds.) Now a real ball of course does have some effect on the metric of the space-time it is in. But let us consider a ball that is so small that its effect on the metric is negligible. Presumably it will still be the case that certain states of this ball on that space-like surface are not compatible with the global time travel structure of this universe.

This means that the actual distribution of matter on such a space-like surface can be extended into a space-time with closed time-like lines, but that certain counterfactual distributions of matter on this space-like surface can not be extended into the same space-time. But note that the changes made in the matter distribution (when going from the actual to the counterfactual distribution) do not in any non-negligible way affect the metric properties of the space-time. (Recall that the changes only effect test particles.) Thus the reason why the global time travel properties of the counterfactual space-time have to be significantly different from the actual space-time is not that there are problems with metric singularities or alterations in the metric that force significant global changes when we go to the counterfactual matter distribution. The reason that the counterfactual space-time has to be different is that in the counterfactual world the ball’s initial state of motion starting on the space-like surface, could not “meet up” in a consistent way with its earlier self (could not be consistently extended) if we were to let the global structure of the counterfactual space-time be the same as that of the actual space-time. Now, it is not bizarre or implausible that there is a counterfactual dependence of manifold structure, even of its topology, on matter distributions on spacelike surfaces. For instance, certain matter distributions may lead to singularities, others may not. We may indeed in some sense have causal power over the topology of the space-time we live in. But this power normally comes via the Einstein equations. But it is bizarre to think that there could be a counterfactual dependence of global space-time structure on the arrangement of certain tiny bits of matter on some space-like surface, where changes in that arrangement by assumption do not affect the metric anywhere in space-time in any significant way . It is implausible that we live in such a world, or that a world even remotely like ours is like that.

Let us illustrate this argument in a different way by assuming that wormhole time travel imposes constraints upon the states of people prior to such time travel, where the people have so little mass/energy that they have negligible effect, via the Einstein equation, on the local metric properties of space-time. Do you think it more plausible that we live in a world where wormhole time travel occurs but it only occurs when people’s states are such that these local states happen to combine with time travel in such a way that nobody ever succeeds in killing their younger self, or do you think it more plausible that we are not in a wormhole time travel world? [ 5 ]

An alternative approach to time travel (initiated by Deutsch 1991) abstracts away from the idealized toy models described above. [ 6 ] This computational approach considers instead the evolution of bits (simple physical systems with two discrete states) through a network of interactions, which can be represented by a circuit diagram with gates corresponding to the interactions. Motivated by the possibility of CTCs, Deutsch proposed adding a new kind of channel that connects the output of a given gate back to its input —in essence, a backwards-time step. More concretely, given a gate that takes $n$ bits as input, we can imagine taking some number $i \lt n$ of these bits through a channel that loops back and then do double-duty as inputs. Consistency requires that the state of these $i$ bits is the same for output and input. (We will consider an illustration of this kind of system in the next section.) Working through examples of circuit diagrams with a CTC channel leads to similar treatments of Consistency and Underdetermination as the discussion above (see, e.g., Wallace 2012: § 10.6). But the approach offers two new insights (both originally due to Deutsch): the Easy Knowledge paradox, and a particularly clear extension to time travel in quantum mechanics.

A computer equipped with a CTC channel can exploit the need to find consistent evolution to solve remarkably hard problems. (This is quite different than the first idea that comes to mind to enhance computational power: namely to just devote more time to a computation, and then send the result back on the CTC to an earlier state.) The gate in a circuit incorporating a CTC implements a function from the input bits to the output bits, under the constraint that the output and input match the i bits going through the CTC channel. This requires, in effect, finding the fixed point of the relevant function. Given the generality of the model, there are few limits on the functions that could be implemented on the CTC circuit. Nature has to solve a hard computational problem just to ensure consistent evolution. This can then be extended to other complex computational problems—leading, more precisely, to solutions of NP -complete problems in polynomial time (see Aaronson 2013: Chapter 20 for an overview and further references). The limits imposed by computational complexity are an essential part of our epistemic situation, and computers with CTCs would radically change this.

We now turn to the application of the computational approach to the quantum physics of time travel (see Deutsch 1991; Deutsch & Lockwood 1994). By contrast with the earlier discussions of constraints in classical systems, they claim to show that time travel never imposes any constraints on the pre-time travel state of quantum systems. The essence of this account is as follows. [ 7 ]

A quantum system starts in state $S_1$, interacts with its older self, after the interaction is in state $S_2$, time travels while developing into state $S_3$, then interacts with its younger self, and ends in state $S_4$ (see figure 10 ).

Figure 10 [An extended description of figure 10 is in the supplement.]

Deutsch assumes that the set of possible states of this system are the mixed states, i.e., are represented by the density matrices over the Hilbert space of that system. Deutsch then shows that for any initial state $S_1$, any unitary interaction between the older and younger self, and any unitary development during time travel, there is a consistent solution, i.e., there is at least one pair of states $S_2$ and $S_3$ such that when $S_1$ interacts with $S_3$ it will change to state $S_2$ and $S_2$ will then develop into $S_3$. The states $S_2, S_3$ and $S_4$ will typically be not be pure states, i.e., will be non-trivial mixed states, even if $S_1$ is pure. In order to understand how this leads to interpretational problems let us give an example. Consider a system that has a two dimensional Hilbert space with as a basis the states $\vc{+}$ and $\vc{-}$. Let us suppose that when state $\vc{+}$ of the young system encounters state $\vc{+}$ of the older system, they interact and the young system develops into state $\vc{-}$ and the old system remains in state $\vc{+}$. In obvious notation:

Similarly, suppose that:

Let us furthermore assume that there is no development of the state of the system during time travel, i.e., that $\vc{+}_2$ develops into $\vc{+}_3$, and that $\vc{-}_2$ develops into $\vc{-}_3$.

Now, if the only possible states of the system were $\vc{+}$ and $\vc{-}$ (i.e., if there were no superpositions or mixtures of these states), then there is a constraint on initial states: initial state $\vc{+}_1$ is impossible. For if $\vc{+}_1$ interacts with $\vc{+}_3$ then it will develop into $\vc{-}_2$, which, during time travel, will develop into $\vc{-}_3$, which inconsistent with the assumed state $\vc{+}_3$. Similarly if $\vc{+}_1$ interacts with $\vc{-}_3$ it will develop into $\vc{+}_2$, which will then develop into $\vc{+}_3$ which is also inconsistent. Thus the system can not start in state $\vc{+}_1$.

But, says Deutsch, in quantum mechanics such a system can also be in any mixture of the states $\vc{+}$ and $\vc{-}$. Suppose that the older system, prior to the interaction, is in a state $S_3$ which is an equal mixture of 50% $\vc{+}_3$ and 50% $\vc{-}_3$. Then the younger system during the interaction will develop into a mixture of 50% $\vc{+}_2$ and 50% $\vc{-}_2$, which will then develop into a mixture of 50% $\vc{+}_3$ and 50% $\vc{-}_3$, which is consistent! More generally Deutsch uses a fixed point theorem to show that no matter what the unitary development during interaction is, and no matter what the unitary development during time travel is, for any state $S_1$ there is always a state $S_3$ (which typically is not a pure state) which causes $S_1$ to develop into a state $S_2$ which develops into that state $S_3$. Thus quantum mechanics comes to the rescue: it shows in all generality that no constraints on initial states are needed!

One might wonder why Deutsch appeals to mixed states: will superpositions of states $\vc{+}$ and $\vc{-}$ not suffice? Unfortunately such an idea does not work. Suppose again that the initial state is $\vc{+}_1$. One might suggest that that if state $S_3$ is

one will obtain a consistent development. For one might think that when initial state $\vc{+}_1$ encounters the superposition

it will develop into superposition

and that this in turn will develop into

as desired. However this is not correct. For initial state $\vc{+}_1$ when it encounters

will develop into the entangled state

In so far as one can speak of the state of the young system after this interaction, it is in the mixture of 50% $\vc{+}_2$ and 50% $\vc{-}_2$, not in the superposition

So Deutsch does need his recourse to mixed states.

This clarification of why Deutsch needs his mixtures does however indicate a serious worry about the simplifications that are part of Deutsch’s account. After the interaction the old and young system will (typically) be in an entangled state. Although for purposes of a measurement on one of the two systems one can say that this system is in a mixed state, one can not represent the full state of the two systems by specifying the mixed state of each separate part, as there are correlations between observables of the two systems that are not represented by these two mixed states, but are represented in the joint entangled state. But if there really is an entangled state of the old and young systems directly after the interaction, how is one to represent the subsequent development of this entangled state? Will the state of the younger system remain entangled with the state of the older system as the younger system time travels and the older system moves on into the future? On what space-like surfaces are we to imagine this total entangled state to be? At this point it becomes clear that there is no obvious and simple way to extend elementary non-relativistic quantum mechanics to space-times with closed time-like curves: we apparently need to characterize not just the entanglement between two systems, but entanglement relative to specific spacetime descriptions.

How does Deutsch avoid these complications? Deutsch assumes a mixed state $S_3$ of the older system prior to the interaction with the younger system. He lets it interact with an arbitrary pure state $S_1$ younger system. After this interaction there is an entangled state $S'$ of the two systems. Deutsch computes the mixed state $S_2$ of the younger system which is implied by this entangled state $S'$. His demand for consistency then is just that this mixed state $S_2$ develops into the mixed state $S_3$. Now it is not at all clear that this is a legitimate way to simplify the problem of time travel in quantum mechanics. But even if we grant him this simplification there is a problem: how are we to understand these mixtures?

If we take an ignorance interpretation of mixtures we run into trouble. For suppose that we assume that in each individual case each older system is either in state $\vc{+}_3$ or in state $\vc{-}_3$ prior to the interaction. Then we regain our paradox. Deutsch instead recommends the following, many worlds, picture of mixtures. Suppose we start with state $\vc{+}_1$ in all worlds. In some of the many worlds the older system will be in the $\vc{+}_3$ state, let us call them A -worlds, and in some worlds, B -worlds, it will be in the $\vc{-}_3$ state. Thus in A -worlds after interaction we will have state $\vc{-}_2$ , and in B -worlds we will have state $\vc{+}_2$. During time travel the $\vc{-}_2$ state will remain the same, i.e., turn into state $\vc{-}_3$, but the systems in question will travel from A -worlds to B -worlds. Similarly the $\vc{+}$ $_2$ states will travel from the B -worlds to the A -worlds, thus preserving consistency.

Now whatever one thinks of the merits of many worlds interpretations, and of this understanding of it applied to mixtures, in the end one does not obtain genuine time travel in Deutsch’s account. The systems in question travel from one time in one world to another time in another world, but no system travels to an earlier time in the same world. (This is so at least in the normal sense of the word “world”, the sense that one means when, for instance, one says “there was, and will be, only one Elvis Presley in this world.”) Thus, even if it were a reasonable view, it is not quite as interesting as it may have initially seemed. (See Wallace 2012 for a more sympathetic treatment, that explores several further implications of accepting time travel in conjunction with the many worlds interpretation.)

We close by acknowledging that Deutsch’s starting point—the claim that this computational model captures the essential features of quantum systems in a spacetime with CTCs—has been the subject of some debate. Several physicists have pursued a quite different treatment of evolution of quantum systems through CTC’s, based on considering the “post-selected” state (see Lloyd et al. 2011). Their motivations for implementing the consistency condition in terms of the post-selected state reflects a different stance towards quantum foundations. A different line of argument aims to determine whether Deutsch’s treatment holds as an appropriate limiting case of a more rigorous treatment, such as quantum field theory in curved spacetimes. For example, Verch (2020) establishes several results challenging the assumption that Deutsch’s treatment is tied to the presence of CTC’s, or that it is compatible with the entanglement structure of quantum fields.

What remains of the grandfather paradox in general relativistic time travel worlds is the fact that in some cases the states on edgeless spacelike surfaces are “overconstrained”, so that one has less than the usual freedom in specifying conditions on such a surface, given the time-travel structure, and in some cases such states are “underconstrained”, so that states on edgeless space-like surfaces do not determine what happens elsewhere in the way that they usually do, given the time travel structure. There can also be mixtures of those two types of cases. The extent to which states are overconstrained and/or underconstrained in realistic models is as yet unclear, though it would be very surprising if neither obtained. The extant literature has primarily focused on the problem of overconstraint, since that, often, either is regarded as a metaphysical obstacle to the possibility time travel, or as an epistemological obstacle to the plausibility of time travel in our world. While it is true that our world would be quite different from the way we normally think it is if states were overconstrained, underconstraint seems at least as bizarre as overconstraint. Nonetheless, neither directly rules out the possibility of time travel.

If time travel entailed contradictions then the issue would be settled. And indeed, most of the stories employing time travel in popular culture are logically incoherent: one cannot “change” the past to be different from what it was, since the past (like the present and the future) only occurs once. But if the only requirement demanded is logical coherence, then it seems all too easy. A clever author can devise a coherent time-travel scenario in which everything happens just once and in a consistent way. This is just too cheap: logical coherence is a very weak condition, and many things we take to be metaphysically impossible are logically coherent. For example, it involves no logical contradiction to suppose that water is not molecular, but if both chemistry and Kripke are right it is a metaphysical impossibility. We have been interested not in logical possibility but in physical possibility. But even so, our conditions have been relatively weak: we have asked only whether time-travel is consistent with the universal validity of certain fundamental physical laws and with the notion that the physical state on a surface prior to the time travel region be unconstrained. It is perfectly possible that the physical laws obey this condition, but still that time travel is not metaphysically possible because of the nature of time itself. Consider an analogy. Aristotle believed that water is homoiomerous and infinitely divisible: any bit of water could be subdivided, in principle, into smaller bits of water. Aristotle’s view contains no logical contradiction. It was certainly consistent with Aristotle’s conception of water that it be homoiomerous, so this was, for him, a conceptual possibility. But if chemistry is right, Aristotle was wrong both about what water is like and what is possible for it. It can’t be infinitely divided, even though no logical or conceptual analysis would reveal that.

Similarly, even if all of our consistency conditions can be met, it does not follow that time travel is physically possible, only that some specific physical considerations cannot rule it out. The only serious proof of the possibility of time travel would be a demonstration of its actuality. For if we agree that there is no actual time travel in our universe, the supposition that there might have been involves postulating a substantial difference from actuality, a difference unlike in kind from anything we could know if firsthand. It is unclear to us exactly what the content of possible would be if one were to either maintain or deny the possibility of time travel in these circumstances, unless one merely meant that the possibility is not ruled out by some delineated set of constraints. As the example of Aristotle’s theory of water shows, conceptual and logical “possibility” do not entail possibility in a full-blooded sense. What exactly such a full-blooded sense would be in case of time travel, and whether one could have reason to believe it to obtain, remain to us obscure.

Aaronson, Scott, 2013, Quantum Computing since Democritus , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511979309
Arntzenius, Frank, 2006, “Time Travel: Double Your Fun”, Philosophy Compass , 1(6): 599–616. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00045.x
Clarke, C.J.S., 1977, “Time in General Relativity” in Foundations of Space-Time Theory , Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science , Vol VIII, Earman, J., Glymour, C., and Stachel, J. (eds), pp. 94–108. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deutsch, David, 1991, “Quantum Mechanics near Closed Timelike Lines”, Physical Review D , 44(10): 3197–3217. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197
Deutsch, David and Michael Lockwood, 1994, “The Quantum Physics of Time Travel”, Scientific American , 270(3): 68–74. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0394-68
Dowe, Phil, 2007, “Constraints on Data in Worlds with Closed Timelike Curves”, Philosophy of Science , 74(5): 724–735. doi:10.1086/525617
Earman, John, 1972, “Implications of Causal Propagation Outside the Null Cone”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy , 50(3): 222–237. doi:10.1080/00048407212341281
Earman, John, 1995, Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes , New York: Oxford University Press.
Earman, John, Christopher Smeenk, and Christian Wüthrich, 2009, “Do the Laws of Physics Forbid the Operation of Time Machines?”, Synthese , 169(1): 91–124. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9338-2
Echeverria, Fernando, Gunnar Klinkhammer, and Kip S. Thorne, 1991, “Billiard Balls in Wormhole Spacetimes with Closed Timelike Curves: Classical Theory”, Physical Review D , 44(4): 1077–1099. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.1077
Effingham, Nikk, 2020, Time Travel: Probability and Impossibility , Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842507.001.0001
Fletcher, Samuel C., 2020, “The Principle of Stability”, Philosopher’s Imprint , 20: article 3. [ Fletcher 2020 available online ]
Friedman, John and Michael Morris, 1991, “The Cauchy Problem for the Scalar Wave Equation Is Well Defined on a Class of Spacetimes with Closed Timelike Curves”, Physical Review Letters , 66(4): 401–404. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.401
Friedman, John, Michael S. Morris, Igor D. Novikov, Fernando Echeverria, Gunnar Klinkhammer, Kip S. Thorne, and Ulvi Yurtsever, 1990, “Cauchy Problem in Spacetimes with Closed Timelike Curves”, Physical Review D , 42(6): 1915–1930. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.1915
Geroch, Robert and Gary Horowitz, 1979, “Global Structures of Spacetimes”, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey , Stephen Hawking and W. Israel (eds.), Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, Chapter 5, pp. 212–293.
Gödel, Kurt, 1949, “A Remark About the Relationship Between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy”, in Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist , Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), Evanston, IL: Library of Living Philosophers, 557–562.
Hocking, John G. and Gail S. Young, 1961, Topology , (Addison-Wesley Series in Mathematics), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Horwich, Paul, 1987, “Time Travel”, in his Asymmetries in Time: Problems in the Philosophy of Science , , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–128.
Kutach, Douglas N., 2003, “Time Travel and Consistency Constraints”, Philosophy of Science , 70(5): 1098–1113. doi:10.1086/377392
Lewis, David, 1976, “The Paradoxes of Time Travel”, American Philosophical Quarterly , 13(2): 145–152.
Lloyd, Seth, Lorenzo Maccone, Raul Garcia-Patron, Vittorio Giovannetti, and Yutaka Shikano, 2011, “Quantum Mechanics of Time Travel through Post-Selected Teleportation”, Physical Review D , 84(2): 025007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.025007
Malament, David B., 1977, “Observationally Indistinguishable Spacetimes: Comments on Glymour’s Paper”, in Foundations of Space-Time Theories , John Earman, Clark N. Glymour, and John J. Stachel (eds.), (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 61–80.
–––, 1984, “‘Time Travel’ in the Gödel Universe”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , 1984(2): 91–100. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1984.2.192497
–––, 1985, “Minimal Acceleration Requirements for ‘Time Travel’, in Gödel Space‐time”, Journal of Mathematical Physics , 26(4): 774–777. doi:10.1063/1.526566
Manchak, John Byron, 2009, “Can We Know the Global Structure of Spacetime?”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics , 40(1): 53–56. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.07.004
–––, 2011, “On Efficient ‘Time Travel’ in Gödel Spacetime”, General Relativity and Gravitation , 43(1): 51–60. doi:10.1007/s10714-010-1068-3
Maudlin, Tim, 1990, “Time-Travel and Topology”, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , 1990(1): 303–315. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1990.1.192712
Novikov, I. D., 1992, “Time Machine and Self-Consistent Evolution in Problems with Self-Interaction”, Physical Review D , 45(6): 1989–1994. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.1989
Smeenk, Chris and Christian Wüthrich, 2011, “Time Travel and Time Machines”, in the Oxford Handbook on Time , Craig Callender (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 577–630..
Stein, Howard, 1970, “On the Paradoxical Time-Structures of Gödel”, Philosophy of Science , 37(4): 589–601. doi:10.1086/288328
Thorne, Kip S., 1994, Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein’s Outrageous Legacy , (Commonwealth Fund Book Program), New York: W.W. Norton.
Verch, Rainer, 2020, “The D-CTC Condition in Quantum Field Theory”, in Progress and Visions in Quantum Theory in View of Gravity , Felix Finster, Domenico Giulini, Johannes Kleiner, and Jürgen Tolksdorf (eds.), Cham: Springer International Publishing, 221–232. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38941-3_9
Wallace, David, 2012, The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation , Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546961.001.0001
Wasserman, Ryan, 2018, Paradoxes of Time Travel , Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198793335.001.0001
Weyl, Hermann, 1918/1920 [1922/1952], Raum, Zeit, Materie , Berlin: Springer; fourth edition 1920. Translated as Space—Time—Matter , Henry Leopold Brose (trans.), New York: Dutton, 1922. Reprinted 1952, New York: Dover Publications.
Wheeler, John Archibald and Richard Phillips Feynman, 1949, “Classical Electrodynamics in Terms of Direct Interparticle Action”, Reviews of Modern Physics , 21(3): 425–433. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.21.425
Yurtsever, Ulvi, 1990, “Test Fields on Compact Space‐times”, Journal of Mathematical Physics , 31(12): 3064–3078. doi:10.1063/1.528960

How to cite this entry . Preview the PDF version of this entry at the Friends of the SEP Society . Look up topics and thinkers related to this entry at the Internet Philosophy Ontology Project (InPhO). Enhanced bibliography for this entry at PhilPapers , with links to its database.

Adlam, Emily, unpublished, “ Is There Causation in Fundamental Physics? New Insights from Process Matrices and Quantum Causal Modelling ”, 2022, arXiv: 2208.02721. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2208.02721
Rovelli, Carlo, unpublished, “ Can We Travel to the Past? Irreversible Physics along Closed Timelike Curves ”, arXiv: 1912.04702. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1912.04702

Accessibility

Support SEP

Mirror sites.

View this site from another server:

Info about mirror sites

Library of Congress Catalog Data: ISSN 1095-5054

How would time travel affect life as we know it?

Share Content on Facebook
Share Content on LinkedIn
Share Content on Flipboard
Share Content on Reddit
Share Content via Email

Key Takeaways

If unrestricted time travel were possible, it would lead to a complete breakdown of the rational order of things.
The ability to travel to both the past and future would upend our understanding of time.
Stephen Hawking's "chronology protection hypothesis" suggests there might be natural laws preventing unrestricted time travel.

Science fiction has thoroughly covered the topic of time travel, starting with H.G. Wells' "The Time Machine" in 1895 and continuing right up to modern movies like " Déjà Vu " starring Denzel Washington. But physicists have also explored the nature of time and the plausibility of time travel for more than century, beginning with Albert Einstein's theories of relativity. Thanks to Einstein, scientists know that time slows as moving objects approach the speed of light. Gravity also slows time. This means that, in one sense, all of us can already consider ourselves time travelers in a limited way because we experience a tiny time warp (a difference of only nanoseconds) when we, for example, take a flight on an airplane. But physicists who study time travel today search for plausible ways to create a time warp large enough to allow noticeable travel into the past or future.

In his book "How to Build a Time Machine," physicist Paul Davies writes, "The theory of relativity implies that a limited form of time travel is certainly possible, while unrestricted time travel -- to any epoch, past or future -- might just be possible, too." This astonishing statement begs an important question: If time travel did indeed become a reality, how would it affect our world as we currently experience it?

First, it's important to realize that building a time machine would likely involve enormous expense, and the sheer complexity of such an apparatus would mean only a limited group of time travelers would have access to it. But even a small group of "astronauts" traveling through time and space could conceivably have a tremendous impact on life as we know it today. The possibilities, in fact, seem almost infinite.

Let's begin by assuming that it's possible to create a complete loop in time travel -- that time travelers could travel back into the past and then return to the future (or vice versa). Although scientists view traveling to the future as a much less problematic proposition than traveling to the past, our daily lives wouldn't change much if we could only send time travelers backward or forward in time, unable to recall them to the present. If we could, in fact, complete this loop of time travel, we can conjure up an incredible array of possible effects.

Possibilities and Paradoxes of Time Travel

Time travel turned total mayhem.

Imagine sending a time traveling astronaut 100 years into the future. The time traveler could witness technological advancements that we can only dream of today, much as people at the turn of the 20th century likely couldn't imagine the items we take for granted in 2010, such as iPods or laptop computers. The time traveler could also gain insight into medical advancements, such as new medicines, treatments and surgical techniques. If the time traveler could bring this knowledge backward in time to the present, the time from which he or she came, society could effectively leap forward in terms of its technical and scientific knowledge.

The futuristic time traveler could also bring back knowledge of what lay ahead for the world. He or she could warn of natural disasters, geopolitical conflicts, epidemics and other events of worldwide importance. This knowledge could potentially change the very way we operate. For example, what if a time traveler journeyed into the future and literally saw the effects that automobiles would eventually have on our planet? What if the time traveler witnessed an environment so polluted and damaged that it's unrecognizable? How might that change our willingness to use alternative forms of transportation?

Imagine that time travel became less restricted and more available to a larger population. Perhaps travel into the future would be exploited for personal gain. A futuristic time traveler could draw on knowledge of the stock market to guide his or her investment decisions, effectively using the granddaddy of all insider information to amass a fortune. Militaries might rely on time travel to gain valuable knowledge about the enemy's positioning and resources in future battles. Terrorists could use time travel to scout out the scenes of future attacks, allowing them to carefully plan with precise knowledge of future conditions.

The potential effects seem equally limitless in terms of the less likely possibility of time travel into the past. History books would no longer be based solely on exhaustive research and interpretation of ancient materials. Time travelers could resolve historical debates and verify how things did or didn't happen in the past. Imagine how different our understanding of the world might be if we could say definitively, for example, whether Moses actually parted the Red Sea or whether Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in killing John F. Kennedy. A journey into the past could prove or disprove religious beliefs or result in face-to-face encounters with people such as Jesus, Buddha, Napoleon or Cleopatra -- or even the time traveler's former self. Perhaps time travelers could even bring back from the past things that had been lost, such as extinct species or dead and long-forgotten languages.

But here it's very important to raise the issue of self-consistent narratives and paradoxes. The concept of self-consistent narratives tells us that anything a time traveler would alter or affect in the past would have to remain consistent with the future from which he or she journeyed. Changing the past would effectively change the future, creating a causal loop. But such causal loops would only pose inherent problems if changes to the past resulted in a future different from the one the time traveler came from.

But perhaps the question of how time travel would affect life as we know it goes deeper than even a discussion of potential paradoxes and causal loops. Perhaps a discussion of specific effects of consequences on life as we know it makes little sense when faced with something that could change everything about the way in which we perceive our world.

Physicist Paul Davies gives a good example of a consistent causal loop in his book "How to Build a Time Machine." A mathematics professor uses a time machine to travel forward in time, where he discovers a new theorem. He returns back to the time he came from and gives one of his particularly gifted students the idea for that theorem. The student goes on to publish the theorem, and it turns out that it was this very student's work that the professor perused during his journey to the future. The narrative here is consistent.

On the other hand, with the grandfather paradox, a time traveler goes back in time and kills his grandfather. But if the time traveler's grandfather dies before the time traveler is born, how can he or she exist at all? And if the time traveler doesn't exist, how could he or she travel back in time to kill granddad?

As physicist Paul Davies describes it, unrestricted time travel -- meaning time travel that could form a complete loop to both the past and future -- would ultimately lead to total mayhem. In his words, "Time travel opens a view of the world that is a sort of madhouse where the rational order of things would no longer work. Under those circumstances, it's very hard to see how ordinary human life could continue."

In a world where the relationship between past, present and future is turned on its head, we would transcend the things that define our lives today. We would lose our notion of how time works, which could be so fundamentally damaging to our worldview that we would no longer care as much about the things that matter to us today: work, finances, making plans with friends and family, shopping -- you name it. These things just wouldn't be relevant in this crazy new world because we'd have a newfound preoccupation with simply making sense of a world without a set chronology -- we wouldn't know the order in which things occur.

It may be beside the point, then, to talk about resolving historical debates, saving endangered species or gaining technological, financial or military insight because those things might very likely fall by the wayside in the strange world that would follow the advent of unrestricted time travel.

As Davies makes clear, none of this fallout would occur from one-way travel. Hitching a one-way ride to the future or even the past (assuming we stick with self-consistent narratives) wouldn't cause this kind of profound reordering of the world as we currently experience it. But closing that loop of travel could be, in a word, disastrous.

Davies points out that science fiction normally focuses on the novelty aspect of time travel. But according to him, "It's not a novelty or a curiosity, it's something that strikes at the very rational basis of how we live and function. It's really hard to imagine that anything could be the same again." In his view, unrestricted time travel could change life as we know it so dramatically that we wouldn't even recognize it. Because chronology would have no meaning, we couldn't easily tell if something happened before or after, was a cause or an effect, and we would lose the ability to predict rationally the outcomes of our actions. In essence, it would be as though we had all gone insane.

These sobering potential effects of time travel have caused some scientists to wonder whether a principle exists in nature that would actually prevent unrestricted time travel, such as Stephen Hawking's "chronology protection hypothesis." This type of "theory of everything" might provide a scientific explanation as to why we could never unhinge the universe as we know it by making unrestricted time travel a reality. Scientists have yet to discover such a theory, but hearing Davies' take on the frightening effects of time travel makes one hope that they find it soon -- even if it means that we won't ever know for sure who killed JFK.

Frequently Asked Questions

How could time travel impact our understanding of history, what are the ethical implications of time travel, lots more information, related articles.

What is the fourth dimension?
What does the fourth dimension have to do with time travel?
Does gravity distort space-time?
Are there other universes like ours out there?
Does time change speed?
How Special Relativity Works
How Time Travel Will Work
Theory of Relativity

Future Face Travel in Time

Description of Future Face Travel in Time

Are you curious to know you’re ageing face? Wondering what your face would lookalike when you get old or want to see your old face in the young age? Or even what you were like in the past? Or do you have a face recognition task at hand to match a very old photo of a person? You are at right spot. Try young to old filter and have fun! Future Face is also one of the best photo apps that offer beauty filters: makeovers, age spots, freckles, discolored blotches, wrinkles, roughness, leathery toughness and more. You can select the picture from the gallery or use the camera to take a live picture. You can edit the picture using advanced photo editing tools like you can crop the picture, rotate it, and then can select any age using the age slider to discover what the future holds for you. You can also compare your both pictures look and can save them in the dedicated album. You can also share your creation on social media platforms for interesting comments and views of your family and friends.

The core feature of future face travel in time to offers amazing photo filters to oldify you. Discover how you’ll get old in the future face without aging in the real life. The magic aging booth effect offers perfect prediction. We can guess your future look using your current photo. You can see clear results how you look after 40 or 50 years with cool face editing and aging features! This feature is very simple to use as motion in time. You just have to import your picture and then just select the age using the age slider and it will automatically take you to that era. A high performance AI-based image processing server is at work in the background. For instance, if you are 40 and want to see yourself at age 25 you can travel back to 25 with one click only. And if you want to see yourself older, you can travel in the future with just one click also.

Another core feature is Snap selfie to see the beauty filters directly on you, thanks to the AI technology app! Getting old or young is so easy with the face app camera effects. You can morph, reface, get old, and cartoon yourself with the old man and aging filter, and gender swap anytime. You should also try fun magic features which are glasses and fat filters with your friends. If your beard or mustache is not growing, the fascinating cool beard effect in Future Face reface face editor is for you. We also have nice Long Hair, Black Hair, and Haircut filters for you! We are sure your new hair looks great on you!

This app is the best face changer app young to old powered by AI, which comes up with a cartoon yourself photo tool, oldify, toonme, and many old face filters. Prepare breathtaking toonify pictures for Instagram, and Facebook with this stunning future face app! Don't forget to create lovely avatars for WhatsApp and Snapchat. Thanks to this funny future face app, you can also produce incredibly entertaining content for TikTok.

Salient features

• You can transform your young age face photo into old age as well as old age face photo into young age with this face changing app.

• You can use a camera and phone gallery to import the photo into this makes me an old app.

• You can apply the photo editing tools & then the age slider of 20-60 age range.

• You can compare your both photos (original and transformed ones) with just a single swap right & left swap on screen.

• You can save your transformed photos into an aging shutter app album or share them on social media sites.

How to use this future face predictor app?

• Open the aging prediction app & tap on the start button.

• Import pictures from the gallery or take one using a camera.

• Edit photo using editing tools such as crop and rotate, etc.

• Select the age range using the age slider and then click on proceed.

• After transformation, compare it with a single right and left swap on the screen.

• You can save it into the app album and share with friends.

Future Face Travel in Time - Version 3.0.87

There are no reviews or ratings yet! To leave the first one please

Future Face Travel in Time - APK Information

Latest version of future face travel in time.

Other versions

Apps in the same category, you may also like....

Time Travel: Dream or Possible Reality?

An Introduction to Astronomy
Important Astronomers
Solar System
Stars, Planets, and Galaxies
Space Exploration
Weather & Climate
Ph.D., Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University
B.S., Physics, Purdue University

Time travel is a favorite plot device in science fiction stories and movies. Perhaps the most famous recent series is Dr. Who , with its traveling Time Lords who whisk throughout time as if traveling by jet. In other stories, the time travel is due to unexplainable circumstances such as a too-close approach to a very massive object like a black hole. In Star Trek: The Voyage Home , the plot device was a trip around the Sun that hurled Kirk and Spock back to 20th century Earth. In the popular movie series Back to the Future , the characters traveled both backward and forward in time. However it is described in stories, traveling through time seems to pique people's interest and ignite their imaginations. But, is such a thing possible?

The Nature of Time

It's important to remember that we are always traveling into the future. That's the nature of space-time. This is why we remember the past (instead of "remembering" the future). The future is largely unpredictable because it hasn't happened yet, but everyone is headed into it all the time.

To speed up the process, to peer further into the future, to experience events more quickly than those around us, what would or could anyone do to make it happen? It's a good question without a definitive answer. Right now, no one has built a working time machine to travel temporally.

Traveling into the Future

While it's not possible (yet) to travel to the future fast than the rate at which we're doing it now, it is possible to speed up the passage of time. But, it only happens in small increments of time. And, it has only happened (so far) to very few people who have traveled off Earth's surface. For them, time moves at an infinitesimally different rate. Could it happen over longer time spans?

It might, theoretically. According to Einstein's theory of special relativity , the passage of time is relative to an object's speed. The more quickly an object moves through space, the more slowly time passes for it compared to an observer traveling at a slower pace.

The classic example of traveling into the future is the twin paradox . It works like this: take a pair of twins, each 20 years old. They live on Earth. One takes off on a spaceship on a five-year journey traveling at nearly the speed of light . The traveling twin ages five years while on the journey and returns to Earth at the age of 25. However, the twin who stayed behind is 95 years old! The twin on the ship experienced only five years of time passing, but returns to an Earth that is much farther into the future.

Using Gravity as a Means of Time Travel

In much the same way that traveling at speeds close to the speed of light can slow down perceived time, intense gravitational fields can have the same effect.

Gravity only affects the movement of space, but also the flow of time. Time passes more slowly for an observer inside a massive object's gravitational well. The stronger the gravity, the more it affects the flow of time.

Astronauts on the International Space Station experience a combination of these effects, though on a much smaller scale. Since they are traveling quite quickly and orbiting around Earth (a massive body with significant gravity), time slows down for them compared to people on Earth. The difference is much less than a second over the course of their time in space. But, it is measurable.

Could We Ever Travel into the Future?

Until we can figure out a way to approach the speed of light (and warp drive doesn't count , not that we know how to do that at this point, either), or travel near black holes (or travel to black holes for that matter) without falling in, we won't be able to do time travel any significant way into the future.

Travel into the Past

Moving into the past is also impossible given our current technology. If it were possible, some peculiar effects could occur. These include the famous "go back in time and kill your grandfather" paradox. If you did do it, you couldn't do it, because you already killed him, so therefore you don't exist and can't go back in time to do the dastardly deed. Confusing, isn't it?

Key Takeaways

Time travel is a science fiction trope that may possibly be technically possible. But, no one has achieved it.
We do travel into the future all our lives, at a second per second. To do it faster requires technology we don't have.
Travel to the past is also impossible at the present time.
Is Time Travel Possible?| Explore , www.physics.org/article-questions.asp?id=131.
NASA , NASA, spaceplace.nasa.gov/review/dr-marc-space/time-travel.html.
“Time Travel.” TV Tropes , tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TimeTravel.

Edited by Carolyn Collins Petersen .

Can We Travel Through Time to the Past?
Is Time Travel Possible?
What Is Time? A Simple Explanation
Wormholes: What Are They and Can We Use Them?
Is Warp Drive From 'Star Trek' Possible?
Learn About the True Speed of Light and How It's Used
What Is the Twin Paradox? Real Time Travel
An Introduction to Black Holes
Closed Timelike Curve
Amazing Astronomy Facts
The Science of Star Trek
Cosmic Rays
Cosmos Episode 4 Viewing Worksheet
An Introduction to Gravitational Lensing
Einstein's Theory of Relativity
Learn about the Doppler Effect

Self-Esteem

Mental time travel boosts sense of control and self-esteem, imagining oneself in the future or recalling a nostalgic past can be beneficial..

Posted May 12, 2024 | Reviewed by Jessica Schrader

What Is Self-Esteem?
Find a therapist near me
“Mental time travel” may increase self-esteem and a sense of coherence and control.
One aspect of mental time travel is reliving nostalgic events from the past (called retrospection).
Another aspect involves imagining oneself in the future (called prospection).

Published in Personality and Social Psychology Review , a recent study by Stephan and Sedikides suggests mental time travel can increase self-esteem , coherence, and sense of control.

But what is mental time travel? Let me use an example.

A friend of mine who is in a committed romantic relationship and very much in love tells me that he often relives the day he and his partner first met. He also imagines what their future would be like (e.g., their wedding day, their life as parents).

In both cases, my friend is engaging in mental time travel .

Simply put, mental time travel involves projecting oneself either forward or backward in time. As illustrated, reliving a past event requires reconstructing it from memory , whereas pre-living a potential future event requires imagination .

Benefits of Imagining the Future

Imagining yourself in the distant future (called prospection) allows you to step back and see the bigger picture—to focus on living according to your core values, achieving long-term goals , and living a satisfying and meaningful life.

It also enhances the feeling that future outcomes are under your control. It promotes the belief that your intentions, determination, and commitment will make goal pursuit possible no matter what challenges come your way. Finally, prospection may even increase self-esteem.

Benefits of Nostalgia and Recalling the Past

The same is true of moving backward in time and nostalgizing.

Nostalgia refers to longing and affection for valued past events and a desire to re-experience them. Previous research shows nostalgia can be an important psychological and relationship resource.

For instance, it can help people cope with boredom and meaninglessness . Romantic nostalgia may enhance passion, intimacy, commitment, and relationship satisfaction. Even nostalgic memories of an ex-romantic partner may have benefits and influence perceptions of self-growth .

Self-Affirmation

Mental time travel emphasizes aspects of the self that are positive, abstract, and central to one’s identity , as opposed to aspects that are negative or situation-specific. In other words, it stresses long-term goals, personal values, and positive personality traits, instead of current behaviors and more immediate plans and goals.

Therefore, mental time travel serves as self-affirmation . The core facets of self-affirmation include:

Control: Feeling empowered to pursue desired goals; believing one can influence valued outcomes.
Self-esteem: Having a positive subjective evaluation of one’s worth (i.e., liking yourself).
Coherence: Being able to make sense of one’s experiences and to see life as meaningful.

How Does Mental Time Travel Foster Self-Validation?

To explain how mental time travel can promote self-validation and self-affirmation, let's look at another example, this one courtesy of an old classmate (let’s call her Emma).

Emma told me that before applying to nursing school, she failed a genetics course, which really affected her self-confidence . She felt stupid, incompetent, and worthless.

Eventually, Emma decided to engage in mental time travel—both recalling nostalgic events and imagining herself in the future. Doing so facilitated perspective-taking and seeing the bigger picture: She became more deeply aware of her core values (e.g., authenticity , social justice, making a difference) and positive personality traits (e.g., creativity , compassion , sensitivity, and gratitude ).

And failing genetics no longer defined her.

Additionally, Emma found that by engaging in prospection and retrospection regularly, subsequent challenges became increasingly manageable, including those she faces now in her teaching career as a nursing professor. Consistent with this, Stephan and Sedikides propose that “self-affirmation might serve to strengthen the psychological immune system in non-threatening situations, thus protecting against potential future threats.”

Threats to the adequacy and integrity of one’s sense of self come in many shapes and forms: getting fired, being rejected romantically by a desired mate, receiving negative health news, failing a course or getting a bad grade, etc.

The research discussed suggests that by imagining one’s future self or recalling nostalgic memories, one could get in touch with who they truly are—as defined by their positive personality traits, core values, and long-term goals.

Several positive psychology interventions could be helpful for this purpose, such as nostalgia interventions .

Or, consider the Best Possible Self exercise. Take some time to picture a future where everything in your life has gone as well as possible. Imagine living life in full accordance with your values, having accomplished all your most important goals and realized all your dreams .

What does such a happy, successful life look like? Write about it. This exercise has been shown to improve mood, optimism , and well-being.

Arash Emamzadeh attended the University of British Columbia in Canada, where he studied genetics and psychology. He has also done graduate work in clinical psychology and neuropsychology in U.S.

Find a Therapist
Find a Treatment Center
Find a Psychiatrist
Find a Support Group
Find Online Therapy
United States
Brooklyn, NY
Chicago, IL
Houston, TX
Los Angeles, CA
New York, NY
Portland, OR
San Diego, CA
San Francisco, CA
Seattle, WA
Washington, DC
Asperger's
Bipolar Disorder
Chronic Pain
Eating Disorders
Passive Aggression
Personality
Goal Setting
Positive Psychology
Stopping Smoking
Low Sexual Desire
Relationships
Child Development
Therapy Center NEW
Diagnosis Dictionary
Types of Therapy

At any moment, someone’s aggravating behavior or our own bad luck can set us off on an emotional spiral that threatens to derail our entire day. Here’s how we can face our triggers with less reactivity so that we can get on with our lives.

Emotional Intelligence
Gaslighting
Affective Forecasting
Neuroscience

The 2025 Real ID deadline for new licenses is really real this time, DHS says

If you plan on flying around the country in 2025 and beyond, you might want to listen up.

You have about 365 days to make your state-issued driver’s license or identification “Real ID” compliant, per the Department of Homeland Security.

The Real ID compliance is part of a larger act passed by Congress in 2005 to set “minimum security standards” for the distribution of identification materials, including driver’s licenses. This means that certain federal agencies, like the Transportation Security Administration or DHS, won’t be able to accept state-issued forms of identification without the Real ID seal.

It's taken a while for the compliance to stick, with DHS originally giving a 2020 deadline before pushing it back a year, then another two years and another two years after that due to “backlogged transactions” at MVD offices nationwide, according to previous USA TODAY reports.

You won’t be able to board federally regulated commercial aircraft, enter nuclear power plants, or access certain facilities if your identification documents aren’t Real ID compliant by May 7, 2025.

Learn more: Best travel insurance

Here’s what we know about Real IDs, including where to get one and why you should think about getting one.

Do I have to get a Real ID?

Not necessarily.

If you have another form of identification that TSA accepts, there probably isn’t an immediate reason to obtain one, at least for travel purposes. But if you don’t have another form of identification and would like to travel around the country in the near future, you should try to obtain one.

Here are all the other TSA-approved forms of identification:

◾ State-issued Enhanced Driver’s License

◾ U.S. passport

◾ U.S. passport card

◾ DHS trusted traveler cards (Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, FAST)

◾ U.S. Department of Defense ID, including IDs issued to dependents

◾ Permanent resident card

◾ Border crossing card

◾ An acceptable photo ID issued by a federally recognized , Tribal Nation/Indian Tribe

◾ HSPD-12 PIV card

◾ Foreign government-issued passport

◾ Canadian provincial driver's license or Indian and Northern Affairs Canada card

◾ Transportation worker identification credential

◾ U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Employment Authorization Card (I-766)

◾ U.S. Merchant Mariner Credential

◾ Veteran Health Identification Card (VHIC)

However, federal agencies “may only accept” state-issued driver’s licenses or identification cards that are Real ID compliant if you are trying to gain access to a federal facility. That includes TSA security checkpoints.

Enhanced driver’s licenses, only issued by Washington, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, and Vermont, are considered acceptable alternatives to REAL ID-compliant cards, according to DHS.

What can I use my Real ID for?

For most people, it's all about boarding flights.

You can only use your Real ID card to obtain access to "nuclear power plants, access certain facilities, or board federally regulated commercial aircrafts," according to DHS.

The cards can't be used to travel across any border, whether that's Canada, Mexico, or any other international destination, according to DHS.

How do I get a Real ID? What does a Real ID look like?

All you have to do to get a Real ID is to make time to head over to your local department of motor vehicles.

Every state is different, so the documents needed to verify your identity will vary. DHS says that at minimum, you will be asked to produce your full legal name, date of birth, social security number, two proofs of address of principal residence and lawful status.

The only difference between the state-issued forms of identification you have now and the Real ID-compliant card you hope to obtain is a unique marking stamped in the right-hand corner. The mark stamped on your Real ID compliant cards depends on the state.

Prime Video's Most Underrated Sci-Fi Show Has a Time Travel Twist

What would you do if you found a teleportation chamber under your shed?

The Big Picture

Prime Video has been making a push into original sci-fi shows, with notable successes like The Expanse and Outer Range .
Night Sky , starring J.K. Simmons and Sissy Spacek, is Prime Video's most underrated sci-fi gem, featuring teleportation and time travel.
The show explores rich characters and intricate storylines, showcasing compelling multi-generational character arcs in a single season.

Prime Video isn't necessarily known for its original science fiction television shows just yet, but in the last few years, the streamer has made a concerted effort to rectify that. The Expanse is available on Prime Video and is the most well-known of the genre, having a much-celebrated run of six seasons , but it originally aired on SyFy ; Battlestar Galactica was also picked up by the streamer with great success. However, more recent noteworthy in-house efforts like Outer Range , starring Josh Brolin and Imogene Poots , and Philip K. Dick 's anthology series, Electric Dreams , have shown that Prime Video is getting more serious about developing their own smart and mind-bending sci-fi originals.

Arguably the best sci-fi show they have produced to date, though, is an underrated gem featuring two of the most decorated and accomplished actors of the last 50 years. Night Sky stars J.K. Simmons and Sissy Spacek ; the Holden Miller -created show debuted in 2022 and delivers eight episodes of science-fiction goodness, including fan-favorite elements like teleportation and time travel. The exceptional chemistry between the talented leads and the compelling premise make Night Sky Prime Video's most underrated science fiction original.

A retired couple living a seemingly mundane life uncover a cosmic gateway in their home that connects to an alien world. Their peaceful existence is challenged as they delve deeper into the interstellar mysteries, facing both the vast unknown and their own past traumas.

What Is 'Night Sky' About?

Franklin and Irene York ( J.K. Simmons and Sissy Spacek, respectively) spend their golden years together on their farm just outside the small Illinois hamlet of Farnsworth. Their existence appears sleepy and uneventful, but they hide a secret that will eventually turn their quiet little corner of the world into a dangerous place sought out by teleporters and time travelers with malevolent intentions. In the pilot episode, when Irene asks Franklin if they can "go see the stars," she isn't talking about sitting on the porch and looking at the sky or lying down on a blanket and gazing out into the Milky Way.

Instead, we see Franklin take her by wheelchair across the yard and into a small wooden tool shed. Heading down a dark tunnel lit only by a single bulb, they eventually reach a vault door, and inside is a teleportation portal to another world. They walk into a room with a beautiful panoramic vista of an alien sun and moon across craggy extraterrestrial terrain . It's a phenomenon that they have kept to themselves and used just as a viewing room for years, but when a mysterious man named Jude ( Chai Hansen ) shows up, their life is turned upside down.

Franklin and Irene's Chemistry Is Thrown a Curveball in 'Night Sky'

Simmons and Spacek share the effortless chemistry and charm that only two screen veterans can pull off; it's supposed to feel like they know each other like the backs of their own hands, and it does. The perfect give-and-take between the two draws you into the slow burn in the first couple of episodes, but then the science-fiction and drama elements kick in with a bang.

Their hum-drum existence gets upended by a few different things: their nosy neighbor, Byron ( Adam Bartley ), Irene's thirst for knowing what lies beyond the pane of glass beneath the shed, as well as an enigmatic stranger who appears randomly inside the chamber covered in someone else's blood. Franklin and Irene bring the wounded man into their house and put him up in the room of their late son, Michael, who died by suicide 20 years prior. Afterwards, Irene convinces Frank that this man must've come from "the other side" of the glass.

Sissy Spacek Wasn’t the First Choice for ‘Carrie’

When they rifle through the man's bag, they find all kinds of anachronistic goodies that could only have come from a time traveler, like 17th-century Spanish doubloons and a small brick of an extraterrestrial element. Once he is nursed back to health, we discover that the stranger's name is Jude. Spacek shines as a headstrong elderly woman who finds new life in the arrival of their mercurial new house guest , while Simmons deftly plays the old and skeptical curmudgeon.

Thoroughly Developed Characters Set 'Night Sky' Apart From Other Sci-Fi Shows

In Episode 2, we're introduced to a mother and daughter who are simple alpaca farmers on a sprawling Argentinian farm. Toni ( Rocio Hernandez ) is the precocious daughter of the doting Stella ( Julieta Zylberberg ). We quickly discover that they, too, have a chamber like the one beneath Franklin and Irene's shed. Stella tells Toni that they are guardians of the time-traveling chamber, and it's the most important job that they could have. Another mysterious and intimidating man named Cornelius ( Piotr Adamczyk ) shows up at their farm, giving them an important assignment that will test their resolve and loyalty to a long line of gatekeepers. Eventually, Stella, Toni, and Cornelius find their way to York's Farnsworth farm looking for Jude, and the true meaning of the chambers and their occupants become clear.

Night Sky is a special kind of science fiction series because it takes its time. Many will call that a "slow burn" or deliberate pacing, but for this particular Prime Video show, it's essential to peel back all the layers of the richly contoured cast of characters. There aren't a ton of visual effects or otherworldly spacescapes to be found in Night Sky , but it's a rare science fiction offering that delivers nuanced and rich characters with carefully-crafted backstories , along with love and loss being explored from the perspective of both parents and children. The time-travel and teleportation element will soothe your sci-fi itch, but caring for the outcome of the storylines and multi-generational character arcs makes this a worthy series. There won't be a second season of Night Sky , so go ahead and take in the terrific eight-episode season that we did get from Prime Video.

Night Sky is available to stream on Prime Video in the U.S.

Watch on Prime Video

Matt Riddle set to face former AEW star in a first-time-ever match

A former AEW star is slated to face Matt Riddle in a blockbuster match. The star being discussed is Mike Santana.

Mike Santana left the Jacksonville-based promotion after his contract expired in March 2024. Mike and his tag team partner, Ortiz, worked as a tag team called Proud & Powerful. Santana allegedly left the Tony Khan-led company after not getting a singles push. The current HOG Heavyweight Champion's last appearance in the Jacksonville-based promotion came back in October 2023. He is currently signed to TNA Wrestling and has been on a singles run.

On the other hand, Matt Riddle was released from WWE in September 2023. He was constantly surrounded by controversies throughout his career, which could be the reason for his release. The Original Bro is currently competing in Major League Wrestling (MLW) as well as in New Japan Pro-Wrestling, where he lost his NJPW World Television Championship to Zack Sabre Jr. in April 2024.

Recently, House of Glory (HOG) announced a blockbuster match in which Santana will be defending his HOG Heavyweight Championship against Matt Riddle at HOG The War Within Pay-Per-View on May 24, 2024.

What the future has in store for the former United States Champion remains to be seen.

Matt Riddle revealed how he felt after getting released from WWE

Matt Riddle was released from WWE in September 2023. Since then, The Original Bro has been active in independent wrestling promotions.

While speaking with the TV Insider , Riddle opened up about his release and stated that he has more time to spend with his family .

"I was upset when I got fired from UFC. I was upset when I got fired from WWE. At the same time, getting fired from both of those places, I was extremely relieved because ever since I was younger, since 20, I've been under contract for someone for fighting or wrestling. Even now, I'm still wrestling and traveling and just as busy as before, but I finally have control. I know people might not understand that. But having the ability to say no and the ability to hang out with your family and just do what's best for you sometimes is a breath of fresh air," Matt Riddle said.

It will be interesting to see if Riddle will defeat Mike Santana and become the new HOG Heavyweight Champion.

Matt Riddle set to face former AEW star in a first-time-ever match

With Trump under a gag order, allies step up attacks on his hush money trial

Former President Donald Trump risks a trip to jail if he attacks witnesses in his New York hush-money trial. But his allies aren't covered by the gag order he has repeatedly violated , and they're increasingly launching the broadsides that Trump can't.

On Monday, as former Trump "fixer" Michael Cohen testified that Trump was directly involved in a scheme to kill negative stories about him during the 2016 election, Sens. JD Vance, R-Ohio, and Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., ripped into Cohen.

"He’s a convicted felon," Tuberville said of Cohen at a press conference outside the courthouse. "I mean this guy is giving an acting scene."

"Cohen can’t remember how old his son is or how old he was when he started to work for Trump but I’m sure he remembers extremely small details from years ago!" Vance, who is in contention to be picked as Trump's running mate, wrote in a sarcasm-laden tweetstorm on X . "Michael Cohen admitting he secretly recorded his employer. Just totally normal conduct, right? The best part is he said he did it only once and only for Trump’s benefit. A standup guy!"

Follow live trial coverage here.

In 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about a Trump project in Moscow. At the time of his testimony, he remained loyal to his longtime employer.

The friends-and-family loophole has been exploited by lawmakers and by Trump's sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, the latter of whom has attended portions of the trial. Neither of them has been accused of any wrongdoing in the case, which centers on whether the former president falsified business records in order to help his 2016 election chances by covering up alleged affairs that he denies occurred.

Trump has frequently denounced the gag order, portraying it as an effort to silence his political speech as he campaigns for a return to the Oval Office. Merchan has found him in violation of the order 10 times , fined him and warned him, in no uncertain terms, that further transgressions could result in incarceration.

That's why Trump supporters say it is crucial for his defenders to give his claims voice in the public arena.

J.D. Vance looks on as Donald Trump speaks to the media.

"It's more important than normal that all of Trump's allies speak out loudly against this sham prosecution, given the unconstitutional gag order President Trump is being forced to abide by," one Trump ally said. "They are not allowing Trump to speak out about the connections the judge and prosecution have to the Democrat[ic] Party and Joe Biden, so it's incumbent upon his biggest supporters to carry that vital message on his behalf."

Trump has said that he is ready to testify in his own defense at the trial, but many legal experts note that his lawyers are likely to advise against that.

In addition to the two senators, Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., and the Republican attorneys general of Iowa and Alabama — Brenna Bird and Steve Marshall — went to the courthouse Monday to support Trump.

“I have been a prosecutor for 30 years and have never witnessed a greater perversion of the criminal justice system than I did this morning," Marshall said in a statement to NBC News. "This reeks of desperation from a party that has clearly lost all confidence in its nominee, but even this circus won’t distract Americans from recognizing the failures of this administration."

Malliotakis, who represents Staten Island and part of Brooklyn, said Trump is being subjected to a "sham trial" that depends on the testimony of a "convicted disbarred perjurer" in Cohen. Though prosecutors used Cohen to introduce new evidence — including a recording of Trump telling Cohen to use cash to purchase Playboy model Karen McDougal's story of an alleged affair — prior witnesses had already testified about key details of the catch-and-kill scheme and how payments were made.

Deploying allies points to the two-pronged nature of Trump's current fight: inside the courtroom, his lawyers must convince at least one juror that the prosecution failed to prove he is guilty; outside it , he must convince voters that he should be elected president, regardless of the outcome of the trial.

And without cameras to capture the trial, the Trump campaign has also been twisting the truth of what's happening to supporters, at times telling them versions of developments that don't completely line up with what's going on in the room.

Jonathan Allen is a senior national politics reporter for NBC News, based in Washington.

Knowledge Hub
Product Status

Find a Data Set

Browse All Data Sets
Global Airline Schedules Data
Flight Status Data
Historical Flight Data
Flight Seats Data
Flight Emissions Data
Minimum Connection Times
Master Data
Passenger Booking Data
Global Flight Connections Data
Airfare Data

How we deliver data

Data Delivery
Latest Product Updates

Data Suppliers

Share your data

Try our Data

Flight data sets.

The world's most accurate and information-rich flight data

ANALYTICS PLATFORM

Analyser Analytics Platform

EXPLORE ANALYSER MODULES

Connections

DEMO ANALYSER PLATFORM

Powerful aviation analysis platform to drive commercial and operational decision making across the industry.

WE POWER THE AIR TRAVEL ECOSYSTEM

Consultancies
Governments & Security
Travel Technology
Airport Service Providers

TRUSTED BY LEADING ORGANISATIONS

Air Black Box
View All Case Studies

Springshot: Minimizing delays with OAG's Status Data

All Blogs, Webinars & Podcasts
Covid-19 Recovery
Future of Travel
Aviation Market Analysis
Aviation Sustainability
Data, Technology & Product
Where To Meet Us
Monthly Live Webinars
Travel Recovery Tracker
Busiest Flight Routes in the World
Busiest Airports in the World
Airline Frequency and Capacity Statistics
Monthly OTP Analysis
Middle East Market Analysis
US Aviation Market Analysis
South East Asia Market Analysis
China Aviation Market Analysis
View All Analysis

MIDDLE EAST AVIATION

Transformation, growth and future challenges.

Discover our latest in-depth report focused on the Middle East aviation market.

OUR COMPANY

Diversity & Inclusion
OAG & The Environment
Our Locations
What's New At OAG

GET IN TOUCH

Press Office

Explore a career at OAG. See the latest job openings here.

Navigating the Future of Air Travel: Insights for 2024

In the ever-evolving realm of air travel, the coming year holds a multitude of developments and challenges. Join us as we navigate through the trends and issues that will define the aviation landscape in 2024.

The skies may present challenges, but they also offer opportunities and innovations that will shape the future of air travel. Here’s what we anticipate will shape our journeys through the skies next year.

1) Soaring Prices or Smooth Sailing? Unpacking 2024 Fare Predictions

In 2024, expect a continuation of the status quo in flight prices, with minor fluctuations. Off-peak seasons may offer some relief due to softened demand, but the underlying factors, such as increased salaries and fluctuating oil prices, suggest a stable rather than cost-saving experience.

Keep an eye on routes with additional capacity, particularly in the transatlantic sector, as legacy carriers, led by United Airlines, open new routes, potentially influencing fare dynamics.

2) Turbulence Ahead: Persistent Disruptions and Global Issues

The year ahead won't be without challenges. Lingering disruptions from the previous year and global issues may impact the aviation industry. The Pratt & Whitney engine problem is expected to peak, potentially grounding up to 300 aircrafts globally at any given time.

Carriers like Lufthansa, Indigo, Delta Air Lines, Wizzair, and Virgin Atlantic may experience disruptions from these delays. Some airlines, however, might find opportunities with these engine delays. With reduced capacity, they have an opportunity to exert higher fares.

Boeing’s recent backlog issues add another disruption for airlines that simply don’t know when their new aircraft will be arriving next year, making planning a bit difficult for some.

3) Business Travel 2.0: Short-Haul Sector Faces Uphill Climb

The return of business travel has started post-pandemic, but not all sectors will recover at the same pace. Short-haul business travel may continue to lag behind, as video calling and conferencing options prove to be more time and cost-effective for many professionals.

Then in Europe, regulators are impacting short hall travel with new regulations. With a goal of cutting carbon emissions, new regulations have been put in place that ban short distance travel via plane. For example, in France, the Government has banned flights from domestic airports within a four hour train journey of Paris.

4) AI Takes the Pilot's Seat: Innovations in the Industry

Technological advancements will continue to take center stage in 2024. While drones and VTOLs remain on the horizon, Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications are set to revolutionize the aviation landscape.

We can expect transformative changes with AI, from optimizing operations to enhancing passenger experiences, AI will continue to be a driving force behind industry advancements.

5) The Dogfight for Dominance: Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs) vs. Legacy Giants

The struggle for market share and profitability continues in 2024 between Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs) and legacy giants. Both entities will compete vigorously, with legacy carriers challenging the LCCs. However, LCC’s will need to persevere to secure their market share and revenue.

Consumers will always come back for a low fare –and that’s helping LCC’s maintain a competitive stance. There is a growing share of capacity behind flights operated by LCC’s. Some of the U.S.’s largest airports have seen a huge boost in flights operated by LCC’s in the past 3 years, and that’s expected to grow.

As we look ahead to 2024, stay tuned for more insights and analyses from OAG, You can subscribe to receive an alert when we publish a new article below.

We’re always adding new content, keep up to date by registering your interest here.

View our Privacy Notice

Related Insights

Scandinavia’s star to shine less brightly.

02 May 2024

Japan’s Slowly Rising Recovery: Swimming against a Tide of Adversity

01 May 2024

Taylor Swift: Singapore’s Love Story

11 April 2024

Ukraine war latest: Ukraine sacks commander amid fierce battles with Russian forces; Putin reshuffle 'may hint he is preparing for future confrontation with NATO'

Fierce fighting is taking place in Ukraine's Kharkiv region, with Moscow claiming to have seized nine border villages in the area. And in Moscow, Vladimir Putin has replaced a long-time ally. Submit your question on the war for our experts below.

Monday 13 May 2024 16:03, UK

Residential houses on fire after Russian airstrikes in Vovchansk. Pic: AP

Big picture: Everything you need to know as war enters a new week
Russia claims control of nine villages after shock advance
Threat of fighting spreading, says Kharkiv governor | Commander sacked
Moscow forces walked 'freely' across border, Ukrainian soldier claims
Putin reshuffle indicates he may be preparing for future confrontation with NATO - analysts
Eyewitness: Deborah Haynes reports from town 'flattened' in offensive
Analysis: Putin's 'baffling' reshuffle explained
Who is Andrei Belousov, Putin's new pick for defence minister?

Ask a question or make a comment

That's all our coverage for what has been an important day on the battlefield and beyond.

If you're just checking in, here is a recap of the key developments that took place since this morning.

You can scan the key points above or scroll back through our posts to find out more details.

We'll be back tomorrow with more updates and analysis on the war in Ukraine.

Russian forces claimed to have captured nine villages northeastern Ukraine, having opened a second front in the Kharkiv region on Friday;
The governor of Kharkiv said there was a threat of fighting spreading to other settlements;
The military commander for the Kharkiv region was sacked;
Hundreds of people were evacuated from towns near the border;
Ukraine said it thwarted Russian agents plotting to set off a series of bomb attacks in Kyiv and the Western city of Lviv;
Russia's acting foreign minister said the country was prepared if the West wanted to fight for Ukraine on the battlefield;
Analysts said Vladimir Putin's choice of defence minister indicated he was preparing Russia for a protracted war.

As fighting continues in northeastern Kharkiv, its governor has issued some updates.

Russian forces struck a farm in the town of Korotychy, killing a civilian and wounding three others, said Oleh Syniehubov.

Another attack on Liptsiy injured a 71-year-old woman, who was rushed to hospital, he said.

The regional defence council has ordered the mandatory evacuation of 113 orphans from three settlements, said Oleh Syniehubov.

Plans have been laid out to evacuate a total of 1,600 residents today.

Just 200 to 300 people remain in the embattled town of Vovchansk, he said, which had a population of 2,500 before the assault and 17,000 before the war.

Russian agents plotted to set off a series of bomb attacks in Kyiv and the Western city of Lviv, Ukraine says.

The prosecutor general's office said authorities arrested two military agents over plans to blow up markets and a site near a cafe in the capital, as well as a defence enterprise in Lviv, seizing 19 explosive devices.

Four of the bombs were intended for Kyiv on Thursday, the day when Russia celebrates the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany in 1945, according to the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU).

"According to the plan of the Russian special service, the explosives were supposed to detonate during the supermarkets' peak hours to cause maximum damage to the civilian population," the agency said.

'Disguised as tea boxes'

The explosives intended for the Kyiv builders' markets were disguised as packages of tea, while a bomb was placed in a car for the cafe, according to the SBU.

The Lviv attack was meant to happen last February, the SBU said.

An unidentified defence enterprise was the target, according to prosecutors.

There was no immediate comment from Russia.

Last week, the SBU said it had caught two agents within the state protection department plotting the assassination of Volodymyr Zelenskiy and the head of military intelligence, Kyrylo Budanov.

The Ukrainian military says Russia has had a "partial success" near a village in northern Kharkiv.

But Ukrainian soldiers stopped Russian forces from moving further near Lukyantsi, the general staff said.

It said Russian troops have continued offensive actions, and Ukraine will build up its forces in the area depending on the situation.

Russia launched an incursion from the Belgorod region in Russia across the border into northern Kharkiv on Friday.

Analysts have warned it could stretch Ukrainian forces between two fronts, creating opportunities on the main frontline that Russia may exploit.

Echoing the analysis we featured earlier from the Insitute for the Study of War (see our 11.18am post), a senior Ukrainian official has said Vladimir Putin's reshuffle shows he wants to scale up the war effort.

Ukrainian presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak said: "Russia is finally isolating itself and will try to scale up the war, expand its formats while reconfiguring the economy."

In a surprise move, Vladimir Putin sacked his defence minister of 12 years Sergei Shoigu and named economist Adrei Belousov as Mr Shoigu's successor.

The Institute for the Study of War said Mr Belousov, who has no military experience, will be charged with integrating the defence industrial base into wider domestic policy, further placing Russia on a war footing.

It suggests the Kremlin is preparing for a protracted conflict with Ukraine - or even possibly a future confrontation with NATO, the ISW said.

Approximately 40 miles from the fighting in northeastern Kharkiv, children in the region's namesake city are undertaking their first lessons at an underground school.

The classrooms - the first of their kind - are heavily fortified in an effort to allow some pupils to return to in-person teaching out of reach of Russia's bombs.

Kharkiv's schools have been forced to teach online throughout the war as some Russian missiles can reach the city in under a minute.

Metro stations are playing host to dozens of classrooms, while others have been welded together from layers of steel reinforcing wire and poured cement.

Russia has been increasingly carrying out off-road motorbike attacks under the cover of darkness, according to British intelligence.

Lighter, faster, all-terrain vehicles have highly likely been used since the start of this year to hit Ukrainian positions, transport personnel to the frontlines and conduct reconnaissance, the UK defence ministry has said.

It said Russia reportedly purchased 2,100 Chinese off-road vehicles named Desertcross 1000-3, some of which were personally inspected by Vladimir Putin in November.

"Since the start of 2024, Russia has highly likely increased its use of light vehicles, such as all-terrain vehicles and off-road motorbikes, to transport personnel to the frontlines and conduct attacks on Ukrainian positions, particularly at night."

But the army has sacrificed armour and firepower for mobility, with light vehicles "far more vulnerable than their armoured counterparts", the UK MoD said.

Ukrainian drones have "already demonstrated their ability to effectively target" the vehicles, it added.

As we covered in some detail here earlier this year, Sweden dropped more than two centuries of historic neutrality by joining NATO.

The Baltic Sea, which includes maritime access to the Russian city of St Petersburg and the Kaliningrad enclave, is now almost surrounded by members of the alliance.

Today, Swedish prime minister Ulf Kristersson said Nordic and Baltic cooperation was "deeper than at any time in modern times", underpinned by increasing security threats from Russia.

He is hosting German chancellor Olaf Scholtz and the prime ministers of Denmark, Norway, Finland and Iceland in Stockholm, with security policy and NATO's July summit in Washington topping the agenda.

"We have long appreciated our neighbours, but at the same time underestimated the importance of concrete, operational cooperation," Mr Kristersson wrote in an op-ed in Swedish business paper Dagens Industri.

Meanwhile, the three Baltic prime ministers have been meeting in Lithuania to reaffirm that Moscow's intimidation is not going to dissuade them from supporting Ukraine.

Estonia's prime minister Kaja Kallas said that "Russia has also intensified the shadow war against all of European countries. It wants to really scare and intimidate the free world to scare us away from helping Ukraine".

"We shouldn't be scared," she added.

With a second front opening in the war and a surprise reshuffle in Vladimir Putin's cabinet, it's been an important week for the war in Ukraine.

Readers have been sending in their questions to our senior correspondents and military experts for their take on the changing battlefield environment.

Today, Jeanie asked:

Is Russia taking advantage and conducting an offensive in the border region due to the fact that several Western countries don't allow their weapons to be used on Russian soil?

Military analyst Sean Bell had this to say...

Thanks, Jeanie, for this very topical question.

Russia claims to have seized nine border settlements as part of a major offensive in the Kharkiv region. Although Ukraine has known for months that Russia was amassing military forces in the region - between 30,000 to 50 000 troops - the scale and ferocity of the attack appears to have caught Ukraine by surprise.

Although only Vladimir Putin and his senior military leadership will know the details of Russia's military strategy, most military analysts believe that Russia does not have the military resources to mount a significant and enduring second front without compromising the offensive in the Donbas - widely believed to be Russia's main effort.

However, Putin is well aware that Russia has a window of opportunity to capitalise on Ukraine's shortage of weapons, and by opening a second front, it forces Ukraine to spread its resources even more thinly, leaving Ukraine more vulnerable on the frontline in the Donbas.

Russia's military objectives for this new offensive appear to be to create a "buffer zone" to protect the Russian border town of Belgorod. This logistics hub for the Russian military effort is just within artillery range of Ukraine, and Putin has long promised to push the Ukrainian forces outside artillery range - around 30km.

In addition, Russia wants to threaten Kharkiv, so it's pushing forward to enable its own artillery to be within range of this major Ukrainian city.

Moving large quantities of military personnel and equipment from the frontline cannot easily be done discreetly - which under normal circumstances would leave Russian forces vulnerable to Ukrainian attack.

However, in an effort to limit the potential for escalation, the West has precluded the use of Western-provided weapons to target Russian forces on Russian territory. This significantly limits Ukraine's ability to target Russia's forces as they prepare for a fresh offensive.

However, although we can speculate on Putin's objectives, a battlefield is a dynamic environment, and Russia has considerable forces in reserve to capitalise on any momentum achieved during its current offensive.

Vladimir Putin's surprise choice of new defence minister Andrei Belousov has been speaking to a parliamentary committee as part of his confirmation process.

In his first public comments since being appointed to the post, he called for greater care for soldiers, including better access to housing, hospitals and welfare benefits.

State media quoted him as saying there was too much bureaucracy surrounding the payment of benefits to military personnel.

"I think it's a mess when participants in the special military operation who come back on holiday are driven from civilian medical institutions to hospitals which are often simply overcrowded. This issue needs to be resolved," Mr Belousov said.

The comments appeared to be aimed at demonstrating to members of the armed forces that he understands their concerns and will work to improve their conditions.

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

Local News | Baltimore County judges face challenger in…

Local News | Baltimore County judges face challenger in unusually contentious race

Rob Daniels prepares to meet with supporters during fundraising event at Ruth Shaw. Daniels is running for judgeship in Baltimore County Circuit Court against four incumbents appointed by governors. Daniels said he would be the county’s first LGBTQ judge if elected. (Kenneth K. Lam/Staff)

The race to choose four Circuit Court judges — positions that appear on both parties’ ballots under the heading “judicial” rather than with a party affiliation — has highlighted the process of trial judge elections, which some say politicizes what should be a nonpartisan position.

“I agree with people who don’t think there should be judges running for election,” Baltimore County State’s Attorney Scott Shellenberger said. “It takes a job that’s very nonpolitical and for a very brief period of time makes it political.”

Shellenberger, who supports the sitting judges, emphasized the value of the “double process” of vetting by both a commission that includes a member of his office and then the governor.

Four sitting judges, three appointed by Gov. Wes Moore and one appointed by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, are facing challenger Rob Daniels, an assistant attorney general who has said he would be the county’s first LGBTQ judge and derided “Baltimore City crime-fighting policies.”

“Some people believe I am burning down my own career,” Daniels said, “which is just insanity to think that someone exercising their constitutional right to run for public office would be doing that.”

The sitting judges, Michael Barranco, Marc A. DeSimone Jr., Patricia DeMaio and James Rhodes, are running as a single slate. DeSimone, DeMaio, and Rhodes joined the bench in January 2024, while Barranco was appointed in September 2022. Judges serve 15-year terms.

Judge James Rhodes talks with voter Jennifer Ertel while campaigning at Towson University South Campus Pavilion. Judge Rhodes, Judge Michael Barranco, Judge Patricia DeMaio and Judge Marc DeSimone are running on a single slate to keep their seats as Baltimore County Circuit Court judges. (Kenneth K. Lam/Staff)

To join the bench, judicial candidates apply and undergo a grueling vetting process that involves interviews with bar associations and a judicial nominating commission, along with a detailed questionnaire.

The nominating committee sends names of qualified candidates to the governor, who appoints judges before they face voters in the next election.

Baltimore County voters can select up to four names in Tuesday’s primary.

The question of how much say to give voters was brought into sharper focus this month when the Maryland Supreme Court removed Prince George’s County Circuit Judge April T. Ademiluyi from her position, citing “egregious” misconduct . Ademiluyi also ran as a challenger to the slate of incumbent judges.

Rhodes cited the Prince George’s upheaval as an example of what happens when judges are elected without proper vetting but said it’s still important for the voters to have a say.

The process for choosing appellate judges in Maryland is different: Outsiders can’t enter their names for the ballot, but voters can choose whether or not to retain a sitting judge.

“You can’t just get someone who enters because their last name appears higher than the other judges on the ballot,” Rhodes said.

Daniels, a former prosecutor now working as a civil litigator at the Maryland Attorney General’s Office, has criticized the judicial nominating process, which he has now been through three times, as “flawed” and “subjective.”

“It doesn’t select lawyers who are necessarily known to the local bar, the local attorneys,” he said.

The Maryland State Bar Association supports the retention of all sitting Circuit Court judges, including the four in Baltimore County.

“ These judges have been evaluated, selected and appointed by the Governor because of their judicial merit,” the bar association said on Facebook.

The sitting judges slate sent out a mailer featuring a woman throwing up her hands in confusion, accompanied by text detailing Daniels’ past financial troubles. “Rob Daniels claims to have the character to be a judge. HUH???” it read.

Daniels said on his Facebook page that the mailer, which listed his two foreclosures and a bankruptcy amid the mortgage crisis, proved that his opponents “hate poor people.”

Also on Facebook, Daniels has described two of his opponents as people who “have pulled guns on other people and who have actively opposed law enforcement for most of the last decade.”

Rhodes said the gun claim stems from an encounter where a man threatened his son with a large pipe in a road rage incident, but the man swore out charges with a court commissioner saying Rhodes threatened him first. Rhodes said he is licensed to carry a firearm.

Court records show the man was convicted of second-degree assault in 2021 in connection with the incident. Rhodes said he had the complaint against himself expunged.

Daniels also accused DeMaio, a former administrative law judge and prosecutor in the Baltimore City State’s Attorney’s Office, of being “anti-police” and sought to link her unfavorably to former Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby. DeMaio was deputy of operations and deputy of the major trial division under Mosby.

“Did I agree with everything that was done? No. But in my position, you enforce the policy,” DeMaio said of her time in the office.

She said she led joint command meetings between police and prosecutors while at the state’s attorney’s office.

DeSimone , like Daniels, also applied multiple times to be appointed as a judge before he was chosen. A longtime public defender and professor at the University of Maryland School of Law, DeSimone said he never considered running in an election to become a judge.

“Who am I to say that I’m superior to the candidates that the attorneys and all the respected individuals of our community have in good faith evaluated and found to have superior credentials, judgment and integrity?” he said.

More in Local News

The Maryland Office of the Attorney General is seeking authorization to hire five law firms to assist in what is expected to be a lengthy and complicated legal fight following the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge.

Local News | Maryland AG asks to hire 5 law firms to help with Key Bridge litigation

Aegis | 11th Annual Amanda Hichkad CCA Celebration walk | PHOTOS

Baltimore Police Accountability Board members say they faced hurdles in understanding where city dollars appropriated for police accountability were spent.

Local News | Baltimore police accountability board calls for independence and audit of city spending in delayed report

The operators behind two Baltimore restaurants — one that recently closed and one set to shutter later this month — will collaborate on a new dining concept.

Restaurants, Food and Drink | HoodFellas, RYMKS join forces to open new BBQ restaurant in Little Italy

IMAGES

FACES OF THE FUTURE Vol.2 on Behance
Future Face on Behance
How To Time Travel
How to Time Travel to the Future
Man Uses Stable Diffusion AI to Take Time Travel Selfies in the Past
Where Does the Concept of Time Travel Come From?

VIDEO

NBA2K
How to Time Travel to the Future🤔 Brian Cox explained #universe #science #physics
Traveling To the Future it's literally EASY To DO ! #Timetravel #explained #sciencefacts
What to do if time travel was possible
TIME TRAVEL TO THE FUTURE YEAR 2100: Visions & Predictions #TimeTravel #Future #Futuristic
Time Traveler Who Has Been to The Year 2345 Speaks Out

COMMENTS

Future Face Travel in Time
The core feature of future face travel in time to offers amazing photo filters to oldify you. Discover how you'll get old in the future face without aging in the real life. The magic aging booth effect offers perfect prediction. We can guess your future look using your current photo. You can see clear results how you look after 40 or 50 years ...
See what you will look like in 10 years.
Travel Through Time with Our AI-Powered Aging Feature! 🕰️ ... and let our state-of-the-art AI model work its magic! Watch as your face transforms with realistic and natural-looking details, giving you a glimpse of what you might look like at different ages. Perfect for satisfying curiosity, reminiscing, or just having fun with your ...
Future Face Travel in Time APK for Android
A free program for Android, by Max code. This app lets you see what your face will look like in the future and in the past. Future Face Travel in Time is a great tool to have fun with and to make some interesting photos. If you have a photo of yourself and you want to see what your face will look like in the future or in the past, you can use ...
Future Face Travel in Time
Share your videos with friends, family, and the world
Future Face Travel in Time
An amazing funny app to see your face, travel in time with future face app
TikTok's Viral 'Time Travel' Filter Lets You See Your Future Self
To use the filter, TikTok users need to input "Time Travel filter" in the main search field and tap the filter with the icon that shows one-half of a woman's face aged.
Future Face Travel in Time
As a matter of policy, we do not sell, share or rent personal information about our customers (the users of the App) to any third parties at any time and in any form.
Future Face Travel in Time for Android
The last update of the app was on November 8, 2023 . Future Face Travel in Time has a content rating "Everyone" . Future Face Travel in Time has an APK download size of 23.31 MB and the latest version available is 3.0.85 . Designed for Android version 4.4+ . Future Face Travel in Time is FREE to download. Description.
Future Face Travel in Time
The developer says that this app doesn't collect or share any user data. Learn more about data safety
Time travel is possible, but it's a one-way ticket
Other time travel purposes go to the future I think that from now our world will die off before 2096 basdd on overpopulation, global warming & polution as such creating islands of plastic waste in our oceans. The best thing my opinion go back to the garden of Eden, kill that Serpent Satan before he tricks Eve into the forbidden fruit. ...
Is Time Travel Possible?
In Summary: Yes, time travel is indeed a real thing. But it's not quite what you've probably seen in the movies. Under certain conditions, it is possible to experience time passing at a different rate than 1 second per second. And there are important reasons why we need to understand this real-world form of time travel.
Future Face Travel in Time APK (Android App)
Future Face Travel in Time. Download APK (10 MB) Play On Windows PC. Future Face Travel in Time. 2.65. JK-Apps. Download APK (10 MB) Make me old with this aging booth machine or travel in time with future face app. Description Old Versions Entertainment. Advertisement. Latest Version. Version. 2.65 (65) Update. Oct 3, 2022. Developer.
Back To The Future's Time Travel Explained: How It Works & Is It Accurate?
How Time Travel Works In Back To The Future, Explained. In Back To The Future 's opening act, Doc Brown helpfully explains the requirements for mankind to breach the time barrier - his miraculous new scientific breakthrough. Inside the DeLorean are a set of time circuits and three readouts displaying the current date, the intended destination ...
The scientist trying to travel back in time
Mallett was aged 10 when his father died suddenly, of a heart attack, an event that the scientist says changed the track of his life forever. "For me, the sun rose and set on him, he was just ...
Time Travel and Modern Physics
Time Travel and Modern Physics. First published Thu Feb 17, 2000; substantive revision Mon Mar 6, 2023. Time travel has been a staple of science fiction. With the advent of general relativity it has been entertained by serious physicists. But, especially in the philosophy literature, there have been arguments that time travel is inherently ...
The future of travel: 10 concepts that will change the way we
Like air travel, eco-conscious hotels are paving the way for more sustainable travel in the future. When room2 Chiswick opened in London in 2021, it became the world's "whole life net-zero ...
How would time travel affect life as we know it?
Time Travel Turned Total Mayhem. As physicist Paul Davies describes it, unrestricted time travel -- meaning time travel that could form a complete loop to both the past and future -- would ultimately lead to total mayhem. In his words, "Time travel opens a view of the world that is a sort of madhouse where the rational order of things would no ...
Future Face Travel in Time
Download Future Face Travel in Time 3.0.85 APK for Android right now. No extra costs. User ratings for Future Face Travel in Time: 1 ★
Is It Possible to Travel Into the Future or Past?
It might, theoretically. According to Einstein's theory of special relativity, the passage of time is relative to an object's speed. The more quickly an object moves through space, the more slowly time passes for it compared to an observer traveling at a slower pace. The classic example of traveling into the future is the twin paradox.
Mental Time Travel Boosts Sense of Control and Self-Esteem
Therefore, mental time travel serves as self-affirmation. The core facets of self-affirmation include: Control: Feeling empowered to pursue desired goals; believing one can influence valued ...
The 2025 Real ID deadline for new licenses is really real this time
The 2025 Real ID deadline for new licenses is really real this time, DHS says. If you plan on flying around the country in 2025 and beyond, you might want to listen up. You have about 365 days to ...
The Hurdles Flying Cars Face In Getting FAA Approval
The Hurdles Flying Cars Face In Getting FAA Approval. For decades, science fiction has painted a vivid futuristic world where cars soar through the sky, zipping along aerial highways. Flying cars ...
Prime Video's Most Underrated Sci-Fi Show Has a Time Travel Twist
Prime Video has been making a push into original sci-fi shows, with notable successes like The Expanse and Outer Range . Night Sky, starring J.K. Simmons and Sissy Spacek, is Prime Video's most ...
Matt Riddle set to face former AEW star in a first-time-ever match
Recently, House of Glory (HOG) announced a blockbuster match in which Santana will be defending his HOG Heavyweight Championship against Matt Riddle at HOG The War Within Pay-Per-View on May 24, 2024.
Long spaceflights, frequent travel take a toll on astronauts' brains
"Many astronauts travel to space more than one time, and our study shows it takes about three years between flights for the ventricles to fully recover." ... The results of the study, which was funded by NASA, could impact future decision-making regarding crew travel and mission planning, Seidler said. Karen Dooley June 8, 2023 ...
Gen Z travel trends 2024: Complex values will reshape the industry
At the same time, 67% of Gen Z surveyed by the Pew Research Center reported expressing a need for climate action in the past few weeks, compared to 61% of millennials, 53% of Gen X, and 50% of ...
With Trump under a gag order, allies step up attacks on his hush money
Trump has already violated his gag order 10 times in his Manhattan trial, and the judge has threatened jail time for future infractions. His allies, however, face no such restrictions.
Navigating the Future of Air Travel: Insights for 2024
3) Business Travel 2.0: Short-Haul Sector Faces Uphill Climb. The return of business travel has started post-pandemic, but not all sectors will recover at the same pace. Short-haul business travel may continue to lag behind, as video calling and conferencing options prove to be more time and cost-effective for many professionals.
Ask a question or make a comment
Fierce fighting is taking place in Ukraine's Kharkiv region, with Moscow claiming to have seized nine border villages in the area. And in Moscow, Vladimir Putin has replaced a long-time ally.
Baltimore County judges face challenger in unusually contentious race
The nominating committee sends names of qualified candidates to the governor, who appoints judges before they face voters in the next election. Baltimore County voters can select up to four names ...

Travel Through Time with Our AI-Powered Aging Feature! 🕰️✨

Need Assistance? We're Here to Help! 🙋‍♂️

Future Face Travel in Time APK for Android

A free program for Android, by Max code.

User reviews about Future Face Travel in Time

Explore More

FlipMe Demo App

AI Chatter Love

UZ TV - online tv Uzbekistan

Tuber Pure Vanced

Numerology Calculator

A To Z Telugu Lyrics

Urdu Paheliyan with Answer

Mermaid Wallpapers

Related Articles

That is the spectacular and colossal “Hand of God”

Apple is one step away from bringing ChatGPT to the next iPhones: this is what we know

OpenAI would be developing a new AI different from GPT-5 with great capabilities

Google Maps incorporates two useful novelties in its latest update

Netflix continues to do things that no one has asked for: a reality show based on Charlie and the Chocolate Factory has been confirmed

The new AI from Microsoft is very, very big

How to Install Windows 11 Without Using a Microsoft Account (Very Easy!)

How to use Simontok on your phone in 3 easy steps

The first Neuralink implant is having problems

Ace Your Job Interview: Common Questions and How to Answer Them

What does this mean?

Why is the software program still available?

What is a false positive?

Why is this software program no longer available in our Catalog?

Your review for Future Face Travel in Time

OOPS! This is embarrassing...

future Face travel in time

Future Face Travel in Time

About Future Face Travel in Time

More from JK-Apps

Google Play Rating history and histogram

Changelog of Future Face Travel in Time

Share and embed Future Face Travel in Time

Data safety

No data shared with third parties

No data collected

Security practices

Data isn’t encrypted

Time travel is possible, but it’s a one-way ticket

240 thoughts on “ Time travel is possible, but it’s a one-way ticket ”

Blogging from Canadian Perspectives

Associate Sponsor

Is Time Travel Possible?

How do we know that time travel is possible?

Can we use time travel in everyday life?

In Summary:

If you liked this, you may like:

Future Face Travel in Time

Latest Version

You May Also Like

Screen Rant

Mike Flanagan’s Next Stephen King Adaptation Is The Perfect Time To Revive His 10-Year-Old Horror Movie Trick

How Time Travel Works In Back To The Future, Explained

How Scientifically Accurate Back To The Future's Time Travel Is

Bibliography

Time Travel and Modern Physics

1. Paradoxes Lost?

Support SEP

How would time travel affect life as we know it?

Key Takeaways

Possibilities and Paradoxes of Time Travel

Frequently Asked Questions

More Great Links

Future Face Travel in Time

Description of Future Face Travel in Time

Future Face Travel in Time - Version 3.0.87

Future Face Travel in Time - APK Information

Other versions

Time Travel: Dream or Possible Reality?

The Nature of Time

Traveling into the Future

Using Gravity as a Means of Time Travel

Could We Ever Travel into the Future?

Travel into the Past

Key Takeaways