gmc safari years

5 Best & Worst GMC Safari Years (We Checked)

The GMC Safari has had its ups and downs over the years, with various models providing standout features and performance.

Table of Contents

While some years of the Safari delivered reliable service, others faced challenges and attracted some criticism from drivers and experts alike.

This article aims to discuss the best and worst years of the GMC Safari, helping potential buyers make an informed decision when looking to purchase this versatile minivan.

The Best Year for GMC Safari

One of the standout years for the GMC Safari was 2003.

This model received positive reviews for its reliability and durability. Many owners reported putting well over 200,000 miles on the vehicle with minimal maintenance required.

The 2003 GMC Safari was available in both rear-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive configurations, catering to different needs and preferences.

The 2003 Safari came with a 4.3L V6 engine, offering a good balance of power and fuel efficiency, which was especially impressive for its time. This engine was paired with a 4-speed automatic transmission that provided a smooth driving experience and responsive handling.

In terms of interior features, the 2003 GMC Safari provided ample space for passengers and cargo, as well as various seating configurations to suit different requirements. These features, along with the overall comfortable design, made it suitable for families and businesses alike.

Safety features were also a strong focus in the 2003 model year, with standard equipment such as 4-wheel disc brakes with ABS, driver and passenger airbags, and daytime running lights. These safety enhancements provided added peace of mind for drivers and passengers on their journeys.

Check also the best and worst years for the GMC Canyon pickup .

The 2nd Best Year

The 2001 GMC Safari deserves recognition as the second-best model year for this classic van. While it didn’t receive quite as many accolades as later years, this model still offers reliability and solid performance.

Shoppers can expect to find features such as:

• A potent 4.3L V6 engine delivering 190 horsepower and 250 lb-ft of torque
• A smooth-shifting 4-speed automatic transmission with overdrive
• A maximum tow rating of 5,800 pounds, allowing for versatile hauling capabilities

Despite a few minor drawbacks, the 2001 GMC Safari excelled in a number of areas. With more than respectable fuel economy, owners could expect to achieve up to 16 mpg in the city and 21 mpg on the highway—a notable perk for those prioritizing efficiency.

Safety-wise, this model year showcased improvements over previous years. Although not considered exceptional, it scored better in crash tests compared to earlier models. Standard safety features included antilock brakes, and GM’s Passlock theft-deterrent system provided an added layer of protection.

One thing the 2001 Safari truly excelled in was cargo space. With a cavernous interior, owners could easily accommodate up to 170.4 cubic feet of luggage, making the van a top choice for families or those embarking on long road trips.

While not as highly praised as newer models, this particular year remains a noteworthy option and good value for used car shoppers looking for reliability and performance to boot.

Check also the best and worst years for GMC Jimmy (SUV) .

Other Good Years

As we dive into the GMC Safari’s history, let’s take a look at some other good years for this popular van.

Here’s a list of additional standout years, with brief explanations as to what made them great:

• 2004 GMC Safari : This model year continued to offer the reliable 4.3-liter V6 engine, and it maintained a strong reputation for durability and dependability. Additionally, the 2004 Safari featured comfortable seating and ample cargo space, providing a versatile option for both families and businesses.
• 2005 GMC Safari : As the final production year for the Safari, the 2005 model continued to deliver on the strengths of its predecessors. With its trusty V6 engine and spacious interior, this model remained a practical choice for those in search of a reliable van.

These GMC Safari model years were known for their solid performance and dependability, ensuring that they remain an excellent choice for anyone considering a robust and versatile vehicle.

Problematic Year for GMC Safari

The 1996 GMC Safari, while generally a reliable vehicle, has been associated with certain common issues that potential owners or current owners should be aware of.

One of the most reported problems for this model year revolves around the fuel system. Some owners have experienced fuel pump failure, which can lead to the vehicle stalling or not starting at all. The issue typically emerges after a significant mileage, and the only solution is to replace the fuel pump, which can be a relatively expensive repair.

Engine problems are another area of concern for the 1996 GMC Safari.

These include issues like the “Check Engine” light frequently coming on, misfiring, or engine stalling. In several cases, these problems were traced back to issues with the ignition system, such as a faulty ignition coil or a worn-out distributor cap and rotor. Fixing these problems typically involves replacing the faulty components, which, while not overly expensive, can add to maintenance costs over time.

Transmission failures have also been reported with this model, some occurring at relatively low mileages for a transmission issue.

Transmission replacement or rebuild is a significant expense and can be quite a headache for the vehicle’s owner. Symptoms of a failing transmission can include difficulty shifting gears, the transmission slipping out of gear, or a whining or humming noise. If these symptoms are experienced, it is crucial to get the vehicle to a mechanic as soon as possible to prevent further damage.

The 1996 GMC Safari has also had issues with the power door locks not working correctly, which, while less serious than engine or transmission issues, is still a significant inconvenience for owners. The cause is usually a faulty door lock actuator that needs to be replaced.

Lastly, some owners have reported issues with the van’s exterior lighting.

These problems range from the headlights going out intermittently to the brake lights not functioning correctly, posing a potential safety risk.

It’s important to note that while these issues have been reported, they do not affect every 1996 GMC Safari.

Many owners have had minimal problems and have found the van to be reliable. However, if you’re considering purchasing a used 1996 GMC Safari, or if you’re a current owner experiencing unexplained issues, these are areas you might want to investigate.

Remember, regular maintenance and prompt attention to any problems that arise can go a long way toward extending the life of any vehicle.

Common Problems to Look for in Used GMC Safaris

These vans are known for their durability, but they do have some common issues as well. Watch out for these problems when browsing for a used GMC Safari:

ABS Light Due to Brake System Control Unit Failure: This issue has been reported by 74 people, and it affects the ABS system in your van. While driving, you might notice your anti-lock braking system failing, especially at low speeds.

Outside Door Handles May Break: A total of 70 people have reported this issue. The door handles might show signs of wear, and, in some cases, they can break completely.

Door Locks Stop Working: 62 individuals have reported this issue with their GMC Safaris. The doors may become difficult to lock and unlock, causing inconvenience and potential security risks.

Besides these commonly reported issues, there are some other concerns like brake booster and rotor problems, which are frequently mentioned by owners. While looking for a used GMC Safari, make sure to thoroughly inspect these areas and confirm the vehicle’s service history to avoid purchasing a van with recurring issues.

Go Back: Best & Worst data on all Chevrolet models .

Click to share...

ⓘ  The information in this article is based on data from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recall reports, consumer complaints submitted to the NHTSA, reliability ratings from J.D. Power, auto review and rating sites such as Edmunds, specialist forums, etc. We analyzed this data to provide insights into the best and worst years for these vehicle models.

Current Models

Existing models, popular safari trims.

Rear-Wheel Drive Passenger Van (Base)

Rear-wheel drive passenger van (sle), rear-wheel drive passenger van (slt), all-wheel drive passenger van (base), all-wheel drive passenger van (sle), all-wheel drive passenger van (slt).

Rear-Wheel Drive Cargo Van (Standard)

Rear-wheel drive cargo van (upfitter), all-wheel drive cargo van (standard), all-wheel drive cargo van (upfitter), gmc models by price.

1998 GMC Safari

2001 GMC Safari

2002 GMC Safari

2004 GMC Safari

2000 GMC Safari

News & Reviews

GMC Safari GT, a rad-era hauler with custom-van swagger

This rare 1991 example is up for grabs on RADforsale.com

1991 GMC Safari GT

• Facebook Share
• Twitter Share
• Tumblr Share
• Twitch Share
• Flipboard Share
• Instagram Share
• Newsletter Share
• Youtube Share
• Feeds Share

Popular Vehicles

Popular new vehicles.

• 2023 Ford Bronco
• 2024 Lexus GX 550
• 2023 Toyota Camry
• 2024 Toyota RAV4
• 2024 Ford Bronco
• 2024 Toyota Tacoma
• 2023 Toyota Tacoma
• 2023 Ford F-150
• 2023 Jeep Wrangler
• 2024 Toyota Camry

Popular Used Vehicles

• 2022 Ford F-150
• 2021 Jeep Grand Cherokee
• 2022 Honda Accord
• 2022 Toyota 4Runner
• 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
• 2014 Honda Accord
• 2014 Honda Civic
• 2020 Honda Civic
• 2021 Toyota 4Runner
• 2017 Chevrolet Camaro

Popular Electric Vehicles

• 2023 Tesla Model 3
• 2017 Tesla Model S
• 2016 Tesla Model S
• 2024 Rivian R1T
• 2024 GMC HUMMER EV Pickup
• 2022 Tesla Model 3
• 2023 GMC HUMMER EV Pickup
• 2023 Rivian R1T
• 2023 Lucid Air
• 2019 Tesla Model S

Popular Truck Vehicles

• 2024 Ford F-150
• 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
• 2023 Toyota Tundra
• 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD
• 2024 Chevrolet Colorado

Popular Crossover Vehicles

• 2023 Ford Bronco Sport
• 2024 Chevrolet Trax
• 2024 Honda CR-V
• 2023 Toyota RAV4
• 2024 Subaru Outback
• 2024 Hyundai Santa Fe
• 2024 Honda Pilot
• 2022 Toyota RAV4

Popular Luxury Vehicles

• 2024 Mercedes-Benz GLC 300
• 2024 Porsche 911
• 2022 Lexus IS 350
• 2019 Chevrolet Corvette
• 2024 Lexus RX 350
• 2024 Land Rover Defender
• 2014 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
• 2023 Porsche 911
• 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Popular Hybrid Vehicles

• 2023 Ford Explorer
• 2024 Toyota Sienna
• 2024 Ford Explorer
• 2022 Ford Explorer
• 2023 Toyota Sienna
• 2024 Toyota Tundra Hybrid
• 2024 Toyota Venza

Popular Makes

Featured makes, product guides.

• The Best Electric Bikes
• The Best Car Covers
• The Best Portable Air Compressors
• The Best Car GPS Trackers

2005 GMC Safari Review

See Edmunds pricing data

Has Your Car's Value Changed?

Used car values are constantly changing. Edmunds lets you track your vehicle's value over time so you can decide when to sell or trade in.

Edmunds' Expert Review

• Standard eight-passenger seating, 5,400-pound trailer rating, torquey V6.
• Poor fuel economy, intrusive engine cover makes for small footwells, overall lack of refinement.

No significant changes for the Safari this year.

Edmunds says

Other than its ability to mimic an SUV in terms of towing ability and cargo space, there's not much about the Safari van that makes it a viable choice over its numerous competitors.

Cost to Drive Cost to drive estimates for the 2005 GMC Safari Rwd 3dr Minivan (4.3L 6cyl 4A) and comparison vehicles are based on 15,000 miles per year (with a mix of 55% city and 45% highway driving) and energy estimates of $3.55 per gallon for regular unleaded in North Dakota.

Consumer reviews, read what other owners think about the used 2005 gmc safari., trending topics in reviews.

• reliability & manufacturing quality
• spaciousness
• transmission
• off-roading
• wheels & tires
• handling & steering
• cup holders
• ride quality
• maintenance & parts
• climate control
• infotainment system
• sound system
• fuel efficiency

Most helpful consumer reviews

Truly the best vehicle we ever had, practical good van, excellent for the long haul, 2005 safari highlights.

NHTSA Overall Rating

• Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Overall Not Rated Driver 3 / 5 Passenger 4 / 5
• Side Crash Rating Overall Not Rated
• Side Barrier Rating Overall Not Rated Driver 5 / 5 Passenger 5 / 5
• Combined Side Barrier & Pole Ratings Front Seat Not Rated Back Seat Not Rated
• Rollover Rollover Not Rated Dynamic Test Result No Tip Risk Of Rollover Not Rated
• Small Overlap Front Driver-Side Test Not Tested
• Small Overlap Front Passenger-Side Test Not Tested
• Moderate Overlap Front Test – Original Poor
• Moderate Overlap Front Test – Updated Not Tested
• Side Impact Test – Original Not Tested
• Side Impact Test – Updated Not Tested
• Roof Strength Test Not Tested
• Rear Crash Protection / Head Restraint Poor

Related Used 2005 GMC Safari info

Vehicle reviews of used models.

• Used Honda Fit 2015
• Used Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Worker 2016 For Sale
• Used Lexus ES 300h 2015 For Sale
• Used Genesis G90 2022
• Used Jeep Cherokee 2022

Popular new car reviews and ratings

• 2025 Honda CR-V News
• Mercedes Maybach
• Kia Niro Auto
• 2023 Bronco
• 2023Lexus RX
• Toyota Prius 2023

Research other models of Gmc

• 2024 Sierra 1500
• 2024 GMC Sierra 2500HD
• GMC Sierra 1500 2023
• 2023 GMC Sierra 3500HD
• 2023 GMC Terrain
• 2023 HUMMER EV
• 2023 GMC Sierra 1500
• GMC Savana 3500 Extended Cargo Van For Sale

Research similar vehicles

• Ford Transit Connect Cargo Vans
• 2023 Chrysler Town and Country
• 2023 Honda Odyssey
• Honda Odyssey
• 2023 Sienna
• Mercedes Metris Vans
• Auto Chrysler Pacifica
• 2023 Kia Sedona

Other models

• New Mclaren Artura for Sale in Mount Dora, FL
• Used Ram 1500-Classic in Orland Park, IL
• New BMW 7-Series for Sale in Garden City, KS
• Used BMW Alpina-B8-Gran-Coupe in Reisterstown, MD
• Used Lexus GS-460 in Des Plaines, IL
• Used Lexus Ux-250H in Dickson, TN
• Used Fiat 124-Spider in Greensboro, NC
• Used Chevrolet Astro in Spring, TX
• Used BMW 2-Series in Longview, WA
• Used Lexus LS-460 in Grand Blanc, MI

Join Edmunds

Receive pricing updates, shopping tips & more!

GMC Safari (1985 to 2005)

The GMC Safari was a series of vans introduced for the 1985 model year. The Safari was an upmarket version of the Chevrolet Astro . GMC offered the Safari in passenger and cargo configurations, and with inline four or V6 engines. Production of the Safari took place in two generations (1985-1994, 1995-2005), with model being discontinued in 2005.

Q: What is the highest sale price of a GMC Safari?

A: The top sale price was $18,700 for a 1996 GMC Safari Van on May 14 2022.

Q: What is the lowest sale price of a GMC Safari?

A: The lowest recorded sale price was $2,750 for a 2000 GMC Safari SLE Van on May 13 2022.

Q: What is the average sale price of a GMC Safari?

A: The average price of a GMC Safari is $11,047.

Q: When was the GMC Safari produced?

A: The GMC Safari was sold for model years 1985 to 2005.

Model years for GMC Safari (1985 to 2005)

Showing 11 of 11 related listings

2004 GMC Safari Van

Lot B90: 2004 GMC Safari Van

• Location: Kissimmee, Florida, USA
• Originality: Original & Highly Original  Vehicles that are original or close to original factory specifications, irrespective of condition. May include vehicles that have minor, removable modifications such as aftermarket wheels, exhaust, or accessories such as cargo/roof rack, stereos, etc.
• Transmission: Automatic
• Driver side: LHD

1989 GMC Safari SLE

Lot 501187: 1989 gmc safari sle.

• Location: Bensenville, IL, USA
• Originality: Modified  Vehicles with a period-correct engine and body, with multiple removable modifications, or a few significant modifications such as increased displacement, added performance equipment (turbo, supercharger, headers), transmission swaps, bumpers, or body wraps. Modified vehicles can generally be returned to original factory specifications.

2001 GMC Safari Minivan

Lot 3: 2001 gmc safari minivan.

• Location: New Orleans, LA, USA

2003 GMC Safari

Lot 119371: 2003 gmc safari.

• Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA

Lot 111943: 2003 GMC Safari

• Location: Los Angeles County, CA, USA

1995 GMC Safari

Lot th0052: 1995 gmc safari.

• Location: Greensboro, NC, USA

1996 GMC Safari Van

Lot k150: 1996 gmc safari van.

• Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA
• Originality: Custom  Highly modified and/or Restored vehicles with uprated, non-period correct engine swaps, or engines from outside the original manufacturer, and/or vehicles with significant body customizations or conversions. Generally, Custom vehicles cannot be easily returned to their original factory specifications.

2000 GMC Safari SLE Van

Lot j80: 2000 gmc safari sle van.

2005 GMC Safari

Lot t53: 2005 gmc safari.

• Location: Houston, TX, USA

1995 GMC Safari AWD Conversion Van

Lot 54469: 1995 gmc safari awd conversion van.

• 77,000 mi TMU
• Location: Mahoning County, OH, USA

1991 GMC Safari GT

Lot 121: 1991 gmc safari gt.

• Location: Kane County, IL, USA

• Account Settings
• Aston Martin
• Lamborghini
• Mercedes-Benz
• Rolls-Royce

Car Reviews

Car comparisons, auto resources.

• Auto Insurance
• Auto Glass Repair
• Auto Warranty
• Product Roundups

Top stories

• Manufacturers by Region

Should I Buy a Used Chevrolet Astro or GMC Safari?

The Workhorse Not-So-Minivan

Vehicle Overview

After a decade on the market, General Motor’s “mid-size” vans received their one and only update for the 1996 model year. The short wheelbase version of the van was dropped this year and styling was modified to better resemble the larger full-size GM vans. Base model Astros/Safaris featured a utilitarian front end complete with sealed beam headlights while higher trim models featured a more modern look with stacked horizontal headlights.

All vans were equipped with a four-speed automatic and a choice of rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive. The 190 hp 4.3-liter V6 was overhauled for 1996 to deliver better fuel economy as the van’s official rating went up to 15 MPG city and 20 MPG highway compared to the old model’s ratings of 14 MPG city and 17 MPG highway. However, in 2002 the ratings were lowered to 14 MPG city and 18 MPG highway.

Trims Packages

From 1996 until 2000 the Chevrolet Astro passenger van came in base, LS and LT trim lines. From 2001 until 2005 there were no trim levels as the Astro came as a singular model.

For 1996 the GMC Safari was offered in four trim levels that included base, SLX, SLE and SLT. In 1997 the entry level base model was dropped just leaving SLX, SLE and SLT. For the 1999 model year the SLX trim was replaced by SL. Like the Astro, the Safari was reduced to a singular trim level from 2001-2005.

Top 3 Reasons to Buy

• Space – Although it was originally intended to compete in the minivan segment, these vans were always a bit larger and offer more space. Able to seat eight adults comfortable, there was still a decent amount of cargo room including storage areas under the two rear benches. Those wanting a little more comfort could opt for second row captain’s chairs.
• Price – The newest versions of these vans are approaching 10 years old now and depreciation was never a friend of the Astro/Safari. A low mileage good condition van can be had for quite a low price.
• Towing – with a larger V6 engine and compact pick-up truck underpinnings, the Astro/Safari was more of a truck than most other small vans in the 1990s and 2000s. With rear-wheel drive, these vans are capable of towing 5,500 lbs. when properly equipped.

Top 3 Problem Areas

• Brakes – A host of braking issues have been reported for these vans. The most common has to do with anti-lock brake (ABS) failure at low speeds. The brake booster and rotors have also been an issue. In 2003 most of these problems were corrected with the new six-lug wheel design and larger brakes, but rusting front brake lines affect the 2003-2005 models.
• Safety – The Astro and Safari never scored well in crash test ratings. The IIHS gave the vans a “Poor” rating for every year of this generation. The NHTSA gave it a three-star rating for most areas although the side-impact rating did increase to four-stars in 1999.
• Transmission/Harness – Other less common issues have to do with the failure of the automatic transmission and/or parts related to it. As well, wiring harness failures such as worn wires and melted components are a semi-common occurrence.

Before You Buy

With older models ensure the various recalls have been performed. It’s best to take the vehicle to a certified mechanic to inspect the van before purchasing as items like brake lines, wiring harnesses and the transmission should be investigated.

SEE ALSO: Should I Buy a Used CR-V?

During a test drive pay special attention to both acceleration and braking performance to ensure both are smooth and not choppy. Also pay attention to whether the ABS light comes on ever during braking.

Inspect all exterior door handles and check to see if the sliding side door and rear hatch (or dutch doors) operate properly. If living in a region that uses salt on the roads during winter months, check the underbody for excessive rust.

Best Bang for Your Buck

With a ten year model run of a vehicle that didn’t change all that much, there are a lot of similar vans on the market to choose from. It’s best to avoid the 1996-1999 vans as they had more recalls and complaints than the later models.

Chassis upgrades in 2003 saw the Astro/Safari get larger brakes and larger six-lug wheels. However these vans have had more issues with front brake lines rusting out compared to the older models.

SEE ALSO: Should I Buy a Used Hyundai Santa Fe?

If you don’t live in an area prone to rust, the 2003-2005 models make sense. However, for everyone else we suggest keeping to the 2000-2002 Astro/Safari.

Recall and Crash Test Database

1996 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 1997 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 1998 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 1999 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 2000 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 2001 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 2002 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 2003 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 2004 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 2005 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Crash Test Rating 1996 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 1997 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 1998 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 1999 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 2000 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 2001 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 2002 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 2003 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 2004 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 2005 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari IIHS Crash Test Rating 1996 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 1997 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 1998 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 1999 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 2000 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 2001 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 2002 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 2003 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 2004 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database 2005 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari NHTSA Recall Database

Discuss this story on our Chevrolet Astro Forum .

GALLERY: 1996-2005 Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari

A 20+ year industry veteran, Mike rejoins the AutoGuide team as the Managing Editor. He started his career at a young age working at dealerships, car rentals, and used car advertisers. He then found his true passion, automotive writing. After contributing to multiple websites for several years, he spent the next six years working at the head office of an automotive OEM, before returning back to the field he loves. He is a member of the Automobile Journalists Association of Canada (AJAC), and Midwest Automotive Media Association (MAMA). He's the recipient of a feature writing of the year award and multiple video of the year awards.

More by Mike Schlee

Join the conversation

157000 miles on my gmc safari and still going strong.

• See 1 previous

What year Safari you have? Do you agree with what was stated above as far as avoiding 96-99? I was told to avoid anything older than 1995.

I recommend 03 -05 safari or astro van.

Why don't new front brake pads fit the 2002 Astro LS

Popular Articles

Best Small SUV: The 11 SUV Mega Comparison

3 Reasons Why the 2024 Honda Civic is the Best and 1 Reason It’s Not

Best Small SUV | Testing (almost) Every Compact SUV

Affordable Cars With Surprisingly Higher-End Interiors: Top 10

The Plug-in Hybrid With the Longest Range: Top 10 List

Latest comparisons.

2024 Porsche Cayenne S and Cayenne Coupe Review

What’s the Difference Between the 2023 and 2024 Subaru Crosstrek?

Volkswagen Atlas SE Vs SEL: Which Trim is Right for You?

Hyundai Palisade Vs Mazda CX-90 Comparison

Toyota Corolla LE Vs Nissan Sentra SR Comparison

Car buying tools.

• How to Buy a Car
• Free dealer Price Quote

You may also be interested in

Car Owners are Driving Past Dealerships to Independent Repair Shops

Should I Buy a Used Chevrolet Equinox?

Should I Buy a Used Chevrolet Camaro?

Current Santa Fe Owners Love the New Square Look

3 Things We Like About the 2023 Grand Wagoneer L and 2 We Don't

2024 Toyota Tundra TRD Pro Review: Great Off-Road, But Not at Towing

The 2024 Genesis G70 Gets A New Engine And More Power

This Is Your First Look At The New Toyota 4Runner

The 2024 BMW i4 xDrive40 is the Best Small BMW

What are Rock Sliders and Why Does Your 4x4 Need Them?

2023 Honda Ridgeline Black Edition Review: The Comfort Truck

Aston Martin Will Always Make A Combustion Engine - Lawrence Stroll

2025 Toyota 4Runner is a Land Cruiser Without the Historic Baggage

Hyundai Kona vs Kia Seltos Comparison: Sub-Compact Siblings

Who's Driving Electric? Inside the Satisfaction of EV Owners

2025 Mercedes-AMG SL 63 S E Performance is a 805-HP Mega-Convertible

Victor Mukhin

• Scientific Program

Title : Active carbons as nanoporous materials for solving of environmental problems

However, up to now, the main carriers of catalytic additives have been mineral sorbents: silica gels, alumogels. This is obviously due to the fact that they consist of pure homogeneous components SiO2 and Al2O3, respectively. It is generally known that impurities, especially the ash elements, are catalytic poisons that reduce the effectiveness of the catalyst. Therefore, carbon sorbents with 5-15% by weight of ash elements in their composition are not used in the above mentioned technologies. However, in such an important field as a gas-mask technique, carbon sorbents (active carbons) are carriers of catalytic additives, providing effective protection of a person against any types of potent poisonous substances (PPS). In ESPE “JSC "Neorganika" there has been developed the technology of unique ashless spherical carbon carrier-catalysts by the method of liquid forming of furfural copolymers with subsequent gas-vapor activation, brand PAC. Active carbons PAC have 100% qualitative characteristics of the three main properties of carbon sorbents: strength - 100%, the proportion of sorbing pores in the pore space – 100%, purity - 100% (ash content is close to zero). A particularly outstanding feature of active PAC carbons is their uniquely high mechanical compressive strength of 740 ± 40 MPa, which is 3-7 times larger than that of  such materials as granite, quartzite, electric coal, and is comparable to the value for cast iron - 400-1000 MPa. This allows the PAC to operate under severe conditions in moving and fluidized beds.  Obviously, it is time to actively develop catalysts based on PAC sorbents for oil refining, petrochemicals, gas processing and various technologies of organic synthesis.

Victor M. Mukhin was born in 1946 in the town of Orsk, Russia. In 1970 he graduated the Technological Institute in Leningrad. Victor M. Mukhin was directed to work to the scientific-industrial organization "Neorganika" (Elektrostal, Moscow region) where he is working during 47 years, at present as the head of the laboratory of carbon sorbents.     Victor M. Mukhin defended a Ph. D. thesis and a doctoral thesis at the Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia (in 1979 and 1997 accordingly). Professor of Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia. Scientific interests: production, investigation and application of active carbons, technological and ecological carbon-adsorptive processes, environmental protection, production of ecologically clean food.   

Quick Links

• Conference Brochure
• Tentative Program

• Client log in

Metallurgicheskii Zavod Electrostal AO (Russia)

In 1993 "Elektrostal" was transformed into an open joint stock company. The factory occupies a leading position among the manufacturers of high quality steel. The plant is a producer of high-temperature nickel alloys in a wide variety. It has a unique set of metallurgical equipment: open induction and arc furnaces, furnace steel processing unit, vacuum induction, vacuum- arc furnaces and others. The factory has implemented and certified quality management system ISO 9000, received international certificates for all products. Elektrostal today is a major supplier in Russia starting blanks for the production of blades, discs and rolls for gas turbine engines. Among them are companies in the aerospace industry, defense plants, and energy complex, automotive, mechanical engineering and instrument-making plants.

Headquarters Ulitsa Zheleznodorozhnaya, 1 Elektrostal; Moscow Oblast; Postal Code: 144002

Contact Details: Purchase the Metallurgicheskii Zavod Electrostal AO report to view the information.

Website: http://elsteel.ru

EMIS company profiles are part of a larger information service which combines company, industry and country data and analysis for over 145 emerging markets.

To view more information, Request a demonstration of the EMIS service